journal article·2024-09-10Open access

Smaller Is Better: The Case for Lower-Order Iodoplumbate Species Dominating MAPbI3/Dimethylformamide Solutions

Nadia N. Intan, Blaire A. Sorenson, Yong Kyu Choi, Joshua J. Choi, John L. Fulton, Niranjan Govind, Shelly D. Kelly, Gregory K. Schenter, Paulette Clancy, Christopher J. Mundy

Chemistry of Materials· Volume 36· Issue 17

Abstract

Using complementary experimental measurements and computational predictions of spectroscopic measurements (EXAFS, XANES, and UV–vis), we have determined the identity of the most stable iodoplumbate species in dilute lead halide perovskite precursor solutions. We have determined which species are most likely to be thermodynamically stable compared to others that are unstable or metastable. Condensed phase ab initio models were constructed, and the resulting ensembles were used to directly compare the computed signals to the experimental results of the EXAFS, XANES, and UV–vis spectra of PbI 2:MAI in DMF. The results of this study suggest that only Pb 2+, PbI +, and PbI 2 are dominant in the dilute lead perovskite precursor solutions as thermodynamically stable entities. Our interpretation of the relative stability of iodoplumbate species in solution, based on an analysis of EXAFS and XANES spectra, provides critically important new insight into the species most likely to be responsible for crystal nucleation and growth in these materials. This insight will have a significant consequence on the broad scientific community and will necessitate the reinterpretation of peaks in the UV–vis spectra of lead halide perovskite precursor solutions.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Perovskite Materials and Applications · Solid-state spectroscopy and crystallography · Optical properties and cooling technologies in crystalline materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Physical and Computational Sciences Directorate, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington 99352, United States

Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, The Johns Hopkins University, 3400 N. Charles Street, Baltimore, Maryland 21218, United States

Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Virginia, 385 McCormick Rd, Charlottesville, Virginia 22903, United States

X-ray Science Division, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, Illinois 60439, United States

Funding

Basic Energy Sciences

References (48)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1038/nnano.2015.9010.1038/nnano.2015.90 ↗
2. 10.1038/nmat405010.1038/nmat4050 ↗
3. 10.1002/adma.20150229410.1002/adma.201502294 ↗
4. National Renewable Energy Laboratory Best research-cell efficiencies. May 2022; https://www.nrel.gov/pv/cell-efficiency.html (last accessed on 2024-07-02).
5. 10.1021/acsenergylett.3c0164910.1021/acsenergylett.3c01649 ↗
6. 10.1021/ja505556s10.1021/ja505556s ↗
7. 10.1038/ncomms1330310.1038/ncomms13303 ↗
8. 10.1039/C8CS00656C10.1039/C8CS00656C ↗
9. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b0031810.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00318 ↗
10. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.6b0432710.1021/acs.chemmater.6b04327 ↗
11. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.0c0346510.1021/acs.jpcc.0c03465 ↗
12. 10.1039/D1TA03063A10.1039/D1TA03063A ↗
13. 10.1002/adfm.20221517110.1002/adfm.202215171 ↗
14. 10.1002/adma.20190503510.1002/adma.201905035 ↗
15. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.0c0182010.1021/acs.jpclett.0c01820 ↗
16. 10.1039/C8CC08653B10.1039/C8CC08653B ↗
17. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.6b0491710.1021/acs.chemmater.6b04917 ↗
18. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.2c0134410.1021/acs.jpclett.2c01344 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.commatsci.2019.10913810.1016/j.commatsci.2019.109138 ↗
20. 10.1039/D0TA12364A10.1039/D0TA12364A ↗
21. 10.1038/s41524-018-0106-710.1038/s41524-018-0106-7 ↗
22. 10.1039/D0MH00062K10.1039/D0MH00062K ↗
23. 10.1039/D3MH01474F10.1039/D3MH01474F ↗
24. 10.1021/acs.cgd.9b0146110.1021/acs.cgd.9b01461 ↗
25. 10.1021/acs.accounts.5b0045510.1021/acs.accounts.5b00455 ↗
26. 10.1021/acsaem.9b0020610.1021/acsaem.9b00206 ↗
27. 10.1002/cphc.20160057510.1002/cphc.201600575 ↗
28. 10.1021/jacs.5b0032110.1021/jacs.5b00321 ↗
29. 10.1039/C4EE02988G10.1039/C4EE02988G ↗
30. 10.1038/ncomms1568810.1038/ncomms15688 ↗
31. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.5b0589810.1021/acs.jpcc.5b05898 ↗
32. 10.1063/5.000704510.1063/5.0007045 ↗
33. 10.1063/5.000499710.1063/5.0004997 ↗
34. 10.1039/b615522g10.1039/b615522g ↗
35. 10.1107/S090904950001629010.1107/S0909049500016290 ↗
36. 10.1107/S090904950501271910.1107/S0909049505012719 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.commatsci.2021.11090410.1016/j.commatsci.2021.110904 ↗
38. Schenter, G. K.; Fulton, J. L. In XAFS Techniques for Catalysts, Nanomaterials, and Surfaces; Iwasawa, Y., Asakura, K., Tada, M., Eds. Springer International Publishing: Cham, 2017; pp 251–270.10.1007/978-3-319-43866-5_18 ↗
39. 10.1021/ic101771410.1021/ic1017714 ↗
40. Kelly, S. D.; Hesterberg, D.; Ravel, B. Methods of Soil Analysis Part 5-mineralogical Methods; John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.: 2008; Chapter 14, pp 387–463.
41. Rau, C.; Somogyi, A.; Bytchkov, A.; Simionovici, A. S. Developments in X-ray tomography III; Proc. SPIE: 2002; Vol. 4503; pp 249–255.10.1117/12.452851 ↗
42. Penner-Hahn, J. In Comprehensive Coordination Chemistry II; McCleverty, J. A., Meyer, T. J., Eds. Pergamon: Oxford, 2003; pp 159–186.10.1016/B0-08-043748-6/01063-X ↗
43. 10.1039/D3DD00101F10.1039/D3DD00101F ↗
44. 10.1039/P2993000079910.1039/P29930000799 ↗
45. 10.1016/S1010-6030(98)00214-710.1016/S1010-6030(98)00214-7 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2011.08.03410.1016/j.foodchem.2011.08.034 ↗
47. 10.1021/ed054pA429.110.1021/ed054pA429.1 ↗
48. 10.3891/acta.chem.scand.22-319710.3891/acta.chem.scand.22-3197 ↗