journal article·2015-01-13

Molecular Orientation and Performance of Nanoimprinted Polymer-Based Blend Thin Film Solar Cells

Xinhui Lu, Htay Hlaing, Chang-Yong Nam, Kevin G. Yager, Charles T. Black, Benjamin M. Ocko

Chemistry of Materials· Volume 27· Issue 1
Publisher page

Abstract

In this work, we have used synchrotron-based grazing incidence X-ray scattering to measure the molecular orientation and morphology of nanostructured thin films of blended poly(3-hexylthiophene)/[6,6]-phenyl C61-butyric acid methyl ester blends patterned with nanoimprint lithography. Imprinting the blend films at 150 °C results in significant polymer chain orientational anisotropy, in contrast to patterning the film at only 100 °C. The temperature-dependent evolution of the X-ray scattering data reveals that the imprint-induced polymer reorientation remains at high temperatures even after the patterned topographic features vanish upon melting. Photovoltaic devices fabricated from the blend films imprinted at 150 °C exhibit a ∼21% improvement in power conversion efficiency compared to those imprinted at 100 °C, consistent with a polymer chain configuration better suited to charge carrier collection.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Organic Electronics and Photovoltaics · Nanofabrication and Lithography Techniques · Thin-Film Transistor Technologies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Physics, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong

Department of Physics and Astronomy, State University of New York, Stony Brook, New York 11794, United States

Funding

Research Grants Council, University Grants Committee, Hong Kong · Brookhaven National Laboratory, Office of Science · Basic Energy Sciences

References (24)

Show source-provided references
1. Green M. A. · Prog. Photovoltaics · 2014 · 19
2. Watkins P. K. · Nano Lett. · 2005 · 5 · 181410.1021/nl051098o ↗
3. Allen J. E. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2011 · 99 · 16330110.1063/1.3651509 ↗
4. Johnston D. E. · Nano Lett. · 2012 · 12 · 418110.1021/nl301759j ↗
5. Yang Y. · ACS Nano · 2012 · 6 · 287710.1021/nn3001388 ↗
6. Aryal M. · ACS Nano · 2009 · 3 · 308510.1021/nn900831m ↗
7. Hlaing H. · ACS Nano · 2011 · 5 · 753210.1021/nn202515z ↗
8. Sirringhaus H. · Nature · 1999 · 401 · 68510.1038/44359 ↗
9. Yang Y. · Nanoscale · 2014 · 6 · 757610.1039/C4NR01114G ↗
10. Cocoyer C. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2006 · 88 · 13310810.1063/1.2188600 ↗
11. Shih C. F. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2009 · 94 · 14350510.1063/1.3117226 ↗
12. Li J. · J. Mater. Chem. A · 2013 · 1 · 237910.1039/c2ta00687a ↗
13. Fung D. D. S. · J. Mater. Chem. · 2011 · 21 · 1634910.1039/c1jm12820e ↗
14. Hlaing H. · Small · 2012 · 8 · 344310.1002/smll.201201267 ↗
15. Hu T. · J. Appl. Phys. · 2004 · 96 · 198310.1063/1.1773376 ↗
16. Verploegen E. · Adv. Funct. Mater. · 2010 · 20 · 351910.1002/adfm.201000975 ↗
17. Yan M. · J. Appl. Crystallogr. · 2007 · 40 · 105010.1107/S0021889807044482 ↗
18. Street R. A. · Adv. Funct. Mater. · 2012 · 22 · 460810.1002/adfm.201200031 ↗
19. Street R. A. · Phys. Rev. B · 2012 · 85 · 20521110.1103/PhysRevB.85.205211 ↗
20. Meijer E. J. · J. Appl. Phys. · 2003 · 93 · 483110.1063/1.1559933 ↗
21. Nam C.-Y. · Adv. Funct. Mater. · 2009 · 19 · 355210.1002/adfm.200900311 ↗
22. He Y. · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2010 · 132 · 137710.1021/ja908602j ↗
23. Liang Y. · Adv. Mater. · 2010 · 22 · E13510.1002/adma.200903528 ↗
24. Hofmann T. · J. Vac. Sci. Technol., B: Microelectron. Nanometer Struct. · 2009 · 27 · 323810.1116/1.3253608 ↗