journal article·2018-05-08Open access

Every Atom Counts: Elucidating the Fundamental Impact of Structural Change in Conjugated Polymers for Organic Photovoltaics

Chi Kin Lo, Bhoj R. Gautam, Philipp Selter, Zilong Zheng, Stefan D. Oosterhout, Iordania Constantinou, Robert Knitsch, Rylan M. W. Wolfe, Xueping Yi, Jean-Luc Brédas, Franky So, Michael F. Toney, Veaceslav Coropceanu, Michael Ryan Hansen, Kenan Gundogdu, John R. Reynolds

Chemistry of Materials· Volume 30· Issue 9

Abstract

As many conjugated polymer-based organic photovoltaic (OPV) materials provide substantial solar power conversion efficiencies (as high as 13%), it is important to develop a deeper understanding of how the primary repeat unit structures impact device performance. In this work, we have varied the group 14 atom (C, Si, Ge) at the center of a bithiophene fused ring to elucidate the impact of a minimal repeat unit structure change on the optical, transport, and morphological properties, which ultimately control device performance. Careful polymerization and polymer purification produced three “one-atom change” donor–acceptor conjugated alternating copolymers with similar molecular weights and dispersities. DFT calculation, absorption spectroscopy, and high-temperature solution 1H nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) results indicate that poly(dithienosilole-alt-thienopyrrolodione), P(DTS-TPD), and poly(dithienogermole-alt-thienopyrrolodione), P(DTG-TPD) exhibit different rotational conformations when compared to poly(cyclopentadithiophene-alt-thienopyrrolodione), P(DTC-TPD). Solid-state 1H MAS NMR experiments reveal that the greater probability of the anticonformation in P(DTS-TPD) and P(DTG-TPD) prevail in the solid phase. The conformational variation seen in solution and solid-state NMR in turn affects the polymer stacking and intermolecular interaction. Two-dimension 1H-1H DQ-SQ NMR correlation spectra shows aromatic–aromatic correlations for P(DTS-TPD) and P(DTG-TPD), which on the other hand is absent for P(DTC-TPD). In a thin-film interchain packing study using grazing incidence wide-angle X-ray scattering (GIWAXS), we observe the π-face of the conjugated backbones of P(DTC-TPD) aligned edge-on to the substrate, whereas in contrast the π-faces of P(DTS-TPD) and P(DTG-TPD) align parallel to the surface. These differences in polymer conformations and backbone orientations lead to variations in the OPV performance of blends with the fullerene PC71BM, with the device containing P(DTC-TPD):PCBM having a lower fill factor and a lower power conversion efficiency. Ultrafast transient absorption spectroscopy shows the P(DTC-TPD):PCBM blend to have a more pronounced triplet formation from bimolecular recombination of initially separated charges. With a combination of sub-bandgap external quantum efficiency measurements and DFT calculations, we present evidence that the greater charge recombination loss is the result of a lower lying triplet energy level for P(DTC-TPD), leading to a higher rate of recombination and lower OPV device performance. Importantly, this study ties ultimate photovoltaic performance to morphological features in the active films that are induced from the processing solution and are a result of minimal one-atom differences in polymer repeat unit structure.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Organic Electronics and Photovoltaics · Conducting polymers and applications · Perovskite Materials and Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

School of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Center for Organic Photonics and Electronics, Georgia Tech Polymer Network, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia 30332, United States

Department of Physics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina 27695, United States

Department of Chemistry and Physics, Fayetteville State University, Fayetteville, North Carolina 28301, United States

Institute of Physical Chemistry, Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität Münster, Corrensstr. 28/30, D-48149 Münster, Germany

SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory, Stanford University, Menlo Park, California 94025, United States

Department of Materials Science and Engineering, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina 27695, United States

Funding

Georgia Institute of Technology · Office of Naval Research

References (91)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1039/C4CS00250D10.1039/C4CS00250D ↗
2. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b0017610.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00176 ↗
3. 10.1002/adma.20160028110.1002/adma.201600281 ↗
4. 10.1002/adma.20150302310.1002/adma.201503023 ↗
5. 10.1002/adma.20140308010.1002/adma.201403080 ↗
6. 10.1002/advs.20150009510.1002/advs.201500095 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.orgel.2013.12.01210.1016/j.orgel.2013.12.012 ↗
8. 10.1021/ja308158310.1021/ja3081583 ↗
9. 10.1021/ja204056m10.1021/ja204056m ↗
10. 10.1021/ma201349610.1021/ma2013496 ↗
11. 10.1021/am508756610.1021/am5087566 ↗
12. 10.1038/nphoton.2011.31710.1038/nphoton.2011.317 ↗
13. 10.1039/c0jm03927f10.1039/c0jm03927f ↗
14. 10.1016/j.solmat.2012.03.02810.1016/j.solmat.2012.03.028 ↗
15. 10.1021/acs.macromol.6b0238010.1021/acs.macromol.6b02380 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.orgel.2016.01.03410.1016/j.orgel.2016.01.034 ↗
17. 10.1002/macp.20120054910.1002/macp.201200549 ↗
18. 10.1021/ja400365b10.1021/ja400365b ↗
19. 10.1038/nphoton.2013.20710.1038/nphoton.2013.207 ↗
20. 10.1021/cm402219v10.1021/cm402219v ↗
21. 10.1021/ja206610u10.1021/ja206610u ↗
22. 10.1039/C4TA01083C10.1039/C4TA01083C ↗
23. 10.1002/adma.20130358610.1002/adma.201303586 ↗
24. 10.1039/C3CC47677D10.1039/C3CC47677D ↗
25. 10.1002/anie.20130231910.1002/anie.201302319 ↗
26. 10.1021/ja511984q10.1021/ja511984q ↗
27. 10.1021/ja409881g10.1021/ja409881g ↗
28. 10.1002/adma.20130149410.1002/adma.201301494 ↗
29. 10.1038/ncomms629310.1038/ncomms6293 ↗
30. 10.1039/C5EE01627D10.1039/C5EE01627D ↗
31. 10.1002/adma.20130358610.1002/adma.201303586 ↗
32. 10.1038/nphoton.2015.8410.1038/nphoton.2015.84 ↗
33. 10.1039/C4EE01529K10.1039/C4EE01529K ↗
34. 10.1021/cm302861s10.1021/cm302861s ↗
35. 10.1002/pola.2627510.1002/pola.26275 ↗
36. 10.1021/ja511984q10.1021/ja511984q ↗
37. 10.1038/nphoton.2015.610.1038/nphoton.2015.6 ↗
38. 10.1021/ja020267t10.1021/ja020267t ↗
39. 10.1039/C5CS00650C10.1039/C5CS00650C ↗
40. 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2017.03.00310.1016/j.progpolymsci.2017.03.003 ↗
41. 10.1002/aenm.20140076810.1002/aenm.201400768 ↗
42. 10.1039/C7TA03052E10.1039/C7TA03052E ↗
43. 10.1002/aenm.20160194710.1002/aenm.201601947 ↗
44. 10.1002/aenm.20140052710.1002/aenm.201400527 ↗
45. 10.1021/acs.macromol.5b0127510.1021/acs.macromol.5b01275 ↗
46. 10.1002/aenm.20140199610.1002/aenm.201401996 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.polymer.2016.07.06610.1016/j.polymer.2016.07.066 ↗
48. 10.1021/om201217r10.1021/om201217r ↗
49. 10.1002/adfm.20130285110.1002/adfm.201302851 ↗
50. 10.1021/acs.macromol.5b0125210.1021/acs.macromol.5b01252 ↗
51. 10.1039/c2sc20157g10.1039/c2sc20157g ↗
52. 10.1002/marc.20150039810.1002/marc.201500398 ↗
53. 10.1021/ar900233v10.1021/ar900233v ↗
54. Bard A. J. · 2001
55. 10.1039/C7SC00053G10.1039/C7SC00053G ↗
56. 10.1002/adma.20160128210.1002/adma.201601282 ↗
57. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.7b0144310.1021/acs.jpclett.7b01443 ↗
58. 10.1002/anie.20120507510.1002/anie.201205075 ↗
59. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b0025810.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00258 ↗
60. 10.1039/C4EE03630A10.1039/C4EE03630A ↗
61. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.5b0396810.1021/acs.chemmater.5b03968 ↗
62. 10.1006/jmra.1996.019710.1006/jmra.1996.0197 ↗
63. 10.1021/ja961987110.1021/ja9619871 ↗
64. 10.1016/j.jmr.2015.09.00510.1016/j.jmr.2015.09.005 ↗
65. 10.1021/ar300338b10.1021/ar300338b ↗
66. 10.1021/ja809570310.1021/ja8095703 ↗
67. 10.1006/jmre.2001.233610.1006/jmre.2001.2336 ↗
68. 10.1021/ja990637m10.1021/ja990637m ↗
69. 10.1016/j.pnmrs.2004.06.00310.1016/j.pnmrs.2004.06.003 ↗
70. 10.1021/ja108861q10.1021/ja108861q ↗
71. 10.1002/adma.20120105810.1002/adma.201201058 ↗
72. 10.3390/polym502083310.3390/polym5020833 ↗
73. 10.1038/nmat372210.1038/nmat3722 ↗
74. 10.1039/c3cp52363b10.1039/c3cp52363b ↗
75. 10.1002/aenm.20140053810.1002/aenm.201400538 ↗
76. 10.1002/adma.20110473810.1002/adma.201104738 ↗
77. 10.1002/adfm.20120264310.1002/adfm.201202643 ↗
78. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.12660210.1103/PhysRevLett.94.126602 ↗
79. 10.1109/JSTQE.2010.204214210.1109/JSTQE.2010.2042142 ↗
80. 10.1002/adma.20120087410.1002/adma.201200874 ↗
81. 10.1002/aenm.20110008310.1002/aenm.201100083 ↗
82. 10.1038/ncomms1008510.1038/ncomms10085 ↗
83. 10.1002/adfm.20130182010.1002/adfm.201301820 ↗
84. 10.1039/C3EE42484G10.1039/C3EE42484G ↗
85. 10.1021/ja410092n10.1021/ja410092n ↗
86. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.5b0346710.1021/acs.jpcc.5b03467 ↗
87. 10.1038/nature1233910.1038/nature12339 ↗
88. 10.1021/ja410092n10.1021/ja410092n ↗
89. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.5b0346710.1021/acs.jpcc.5b03467 ↗
90. 10.1103/PhysRevB.81.12520410.1103/PhysRevB.81.125204 ↗
91. 10.1002/adfm.20140319110.1002/adfm.201403191 ↗