journal article·2015-04-14

Self-Regulation of Cu/Sn Ratio in the Synthesis of Cu2ZnSnS4 Films

Melissa C. Johnson, Cody Wrasman, Xin Zhang, Michael Manno, C. Leighton, Eray S. Aydil

Chemistry of Materials· Volume 27· Issue 7
Publisher page

Abstract

There has been a tremendous recent surge of interest in copper zinc tin sulfide (Cu 2 ZnSnS 4, CZTS) as a photovoltaic material, because its optical and electronic properties are well-suited for solar cells, and its elemental constituents are abundant in the earth’s crust. Here we have studied the formation mechanisms of CZTS films, and the factors that control the cation stoichiometry during ex situ sulfidation of precursor Cu–Zn–Sn alloy films in a closed isothermal system. We find that the Cu/Sn ratio in CZTS is self-regulating and approaches 2, regardless of the initial composition of the precursor films, provided that adequate Sn is available in the sulfidation system. If precursor films are initially tin rich, excess Sn evaporates in the form of SnS. If precursor films are initially Sn-deficient, the inclusion of solid Sn in the sulfidation ampule readily generates SnS vapor, which mitigates the films’ Sn deficiency to return the Cu/Sn ratio to 2. When sulfidized for sufficiently long times at sufficiently high temperatures ( e.g., 600 °C, 8 h), films with similar Cu/Zn ratios exhibit similar phase compositions, such that if Cu/Zn >2, a Cu 2 SnS 3 impurity phase is present in addition to CZTS, and if Cu/Zn < 2, a ZnS impurity phase occurs. To achieve phase-pure, void-free films, Sn-deficient precursor films with Cu/Zn in the desired range (typically close to, but slightly less than 2) can be sulfidized with excess Sn in a closed system, or a system that maintains a SnS vapor pressure over the film. Time-dependent sulfidation experiments were performed to elucidate the mechanism of this Sn self-regulation. During the formation of CZTS, almost all of the Sn is found to leave the film as SnS, later reincorporation of the Sn occurring through reactions between SnS vapor and CuS to form Cu 2 SnS 3 . The ZnS and Cu 2 SnS 3 phases within the films then interdiffuse to form CZTS. Because Cu/Sn is 2 in both Cu 2 SnS 3 and CZTS, the Cu/Sn ratio tends to 2 when sufficient Sn is included in the system to consume all Cu. This strategy is useful for avoiding Cu–S minority phases, provided the films are sulfidized to the point of equilibrium phase composition.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Chalcogenide Semiconductor Thin Films · Quantum Dots Synthesis And Properties · Copper-based nanomaterials and applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Chemical Engineering & Materials Science, 421 Washington Avenue, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, United States

Funding

Division of Chemical, Bioengineering, Environmental, and Transport Systems · Division of Materials Research · Institute on the Environment, University of Minnesota

References (24)

Show source-provided references
1. Norris D. J. · Science · 2012 · 338 · 62510.1126/science.1230283 ↗
2. Wadia C. · Environ. Sci. Technol. · 2009 · 43 · 207210.1021/es8019534 ↗
3. Mitzi D. B. · Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells · 2011 · 95 · 142110.1016/j.solmat.2010.11.028 ↗
4. Ito K. · Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. · 1988 · 27 · 209410.1143/JJAP.27.2094 ↗
5. Nakayama N. · Appl. Surf. Sci. · 1996 · 92 · 17110.1016/0169-4332(95)00225-1 ↗
6. Wang W. · Adv. Energy Mater. · 2014 · 4 · 130146510.1002/aenm.201301465 ↗
7. Chirilă A. · Nat. Mater. · 2013 · 12 · 110710.1038/nmat3789 ↗
8. Katagiri, H.; Jimbo, K.; Tahara, M.MRS Online Proc. Libr. 2009, 1165.10.1557/PROC-1165-M04-01 ↗
9. Olekseyuk I. · J. Alloys Compd. · 2004 · 368 · 13510.1016/j.jallcom.2003.08.084 ↗
10. Weber A. · J. Appl. Phys. · 2010 · 107 · 01351610.1063/1.3273495 ↗
11. Scragg J. J. · Chem. Mater. · 2011 · 23 · 462510.1021/cm202379s ↗
12. Redinger A. · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2011 · 133 · 332010.1021/ja111713g ↗
13. Johnson M. · Energy Environ. Sci. · 2014 · 7 · 193110.1039/C3EE44130J ↗
14. Johnson M. · J. Vac. Sci. Technol., A · 2014 · 32 · 06120310.1116/1.4901091 ↗
15. Mousel M. · Adv. Energy Mater. · 2014 · 4 · 130054310.1002/aenm.201300543 ↗
16. Mousel M. · Thin Solid Films · 2013 · 535 · 8310.1016/j.tsf.2012.12.095 ↗
17. Cheng A.-J. · J. Vac. Sci. Technol., A · 2011 · 29 · 05120310.1116/1.3625249 ↗
18. Fernandes P. A. · J. Phys. D · 2010 · 43 · 21540310.1088/0022-3727/43/21/215403 ↗
19. Berg D. M. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2012 · 100 · 19210310.1063/1.4712623 ↗
20. Thimsen E. · Chem. Mater. · 2013 · 25 · 31310.1021/cm3027225 ↗
21. Schurr R. · Thin Solid Films · 2009 · 517 · 246510.1016/j.tsf.2008.11.019 ↗
22. Han J. · Nanotechnology · 2013 · 24 · 09570610.1088/0957-4484/24/9/095706 ↗
23. Yin X. · Chem. Mater. · 2014 · 26 · 200510.1021/cm403423e ↗
24. Kumar S. · J. Phase Equilib. Diffus. · 2011 · 32 · 30910.1007/s11669-011-9907-9 ↗