journal article·2018-08-14Open access

The Influence of Local Distortions on Proton Mobility in Acceptor Doped Perovskites

Jilai Ding, Janakiraman Balachandran, Xiahan Sang, Wei Guo, Jonathan S. Anchell, Gabriel M. Veith, Craig A. Bridges, Yongqiang Cheng, Christopher M. Rouleau, Jonathan D. Poplawsky, Nazanin Bassiri-Gharb, Raymond R. Unocic, P. Ganesh

Chemistry of Materials· Volume 30· Issue 15

Abstract

Optimizing proton conduction in solids remains the most promising solution for achieving intermediate temperature (∼750–1000 K) solid oxide fuel cell devices, and enabling selective membranes for H2 separation. Proton conduction, a thermally activated process, exhibits its highest rates in yttrium (Y) acceptor doped BaZrO3 at an optimal doping level of 20% Y. The presence of extended defects such as grain boundaries has typically generated a wide variability in reported conductivity values. This has hindered a fundamental mechanistic understanding of how (acceptor) doping levels correlate with the activation energy of protons to produce an optimal doping level for fast proton transport. While isolated dopants have been suggested as the primary source of proton trapping, our results indicate that it is the local dopant-density that matters. Here, we show that increasing the local dopant density promotes localized lattice distortions in the presence of point defects such as oxygen-vacancies or proton interstitials. An increasing distortion amplitude traps the point defects more strongly in the form of polarons, forming defect-clusters at higher concentrations. This leads to a monotonic increase in the activation energy (and hence a decrease in proton mobility) as observed in our measurements. The optimum doping level can now be explained as a competition between increasing proton concentration with doping levels and increasing activation energy due to defect-clusters formed by defect-polarons. Based on our findings, we demonstrate how to improve proton conductivity in doped BaZrO3, by inhibiting this dopant-lattice polaronic interaction. This approach should be generally applicable for ionic conduction in perovskite oxides such as oxygen-ion conduction in solid-oxide fuel cells and alkali-ion conduction in solid-state batteries where carriers might get trapped as defect-polarons.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advancements in Solid Oxide Fuel Cells · Fuel Cells and Related Materials · Perovskite Materials and Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia 30332, United States

Center for Nanophase Materials Sciences, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831, United States

Material Science and Technology Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831, United States

Chemical Sciences Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831, United States

Spallation Neutron Science, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831, United States

The George Woodruff School of Mechanical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia 30332, United States

Funding

Division of Materials Research

References (37)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1146/annurev.matsci.33.022802.09182510.1146/annurev.matsci.33.022802.091825 ↗
2. 10.1038/nmat283710.1038/nmat2837 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.ssi.2010.06.00710.1016/j.ssi.2010.06.007 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.ssi.2011.07.00410.1016/j.ssi.2011.07.004 ↗
5. 10.1557/jmr.2007.016310.1557/jmr.2007.0163 ↗
6. 10.1111/j.1151-2916.2000.tb01272.x10.1111/j.1151-2916.2000.tb01272.x ↗
7. 10.1016/j.ssi.2007.02.01910.1016/j.ssi.2007.02.019 ↗
8. 10.1103/PhysRevB.76.05430710.1103/PhysRevB.76.054307 ↗
9. 10.1038/nmat363810.1038/nmat3638 ↗
10. 10.1039/C4TA03487B10.1039/C4TA03487B ↗
11. 10.1143/JPSJ.74.301110.1143/JPSJ.74.3011 ↗
12. 10.1143/JPSJ.73.13010.1143/JPSJ.73.130 ↗
13. Samgin A. L. · Russ. J. Electrochem. · 1999 · 35 · 287
14. 10.1103/PhysRevB.94.07520410.1103/PhysRevB.94.075204 ↗
15. 10.1038/ncomms1583010.1038/ncomms15830 ↗
16. 10.1021/cr020715f10.1021/cr020715f ↗
17. 10.1038/nmat363810.1038/nmat3638 ↗
18. 10.1021/cm902640j10.1021/cm902640j ↗
19. 10.1038/nmat436910.1038/nmat4369 ↗
20. 10.1038/nature1765310.1038/nature17653 ↗
21. 10.1038/nature2500810.1038/nature25008 ↗
22. 10.1038/s41467-017-00248-610.1038/s41467-017-00248-6 ↗
23. 10.1103/PhysRevB.54.1116910.1103/PhysRevB.54.11169 ↗
24. 10.1103/PhysRevB.49.1425110.1103/PhysRevB.49.14251 ↗
25. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.7b0871610.1021/acs.jpcc.7b08716 ↗
26. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b0161310.1021/acs.nanolett.5b01613 ↗
27. 10.1111/j.1551-2916.2011.04795.x10.1111/j.1551-2916.2011.04795.x ↗
28. 10.1063/1.486702010.1063/1.4867020 ↗
29. 10.1146/annurev.matsci.33.022802.09182510.1146/annurev.matsci.33.022802.091825 ↗
30. 10.1039/C0CP01702G10.1039/C0CP01702G ↗
31. 10.1111/jace.1309310.1111/jace.13093 ↗
32. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.05610210.1103/PhysRevLett.107.056102 ↗
33. 10.1103/PhysRevB.92.21411410.1103/PhysRevB.92.214114 ↗
34. 10.1063/1.491913510.1063/1.4919135 ↗
35. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.7b0216310.1021/acs.jpcc.7b02163 ↗
36. 10.1021/cm047976l10.1021/cm047976l ↗
37. 10.1039/C6TA01446A10.1039/C6TA01446A ↗