Comparative Study of the Field-Effect Mobility of a Copolymer and a Binary Blend Based on Poly(3-alkylthiophene)s
Source abstract
Abstract
The performance of highly soluble regioregular poly[(3-hexylthiophene)- co -(3-octylthiophene)] (P3HTOT) as a semiconducting material in organic field-effect transistors (OFETs) is presented in comparison to that of the corresponding homopolymers. Transistors made from as-prepared layers of P3HTOT exhibit a mobility of ca. 7 × 10 - 3 cm 2 V - 1 s - 1, which is comparable to the performance of transistors made from as-prepared poly(3-hexylthiophene) (P3HT) and almost 6 times larger than the mobility of transistors prepared with poly(3-octylthiophene) (P3OT). On the other hand, the solubility parameter δ p of P3HTOT is close to that of the highly soluble P3OT. Moreover, compared to a physical blend of poly(3-hexylthiophene) and poly(3-octylthiophene), the mobility of P3HTOT devices is almost twice as large and the performance does not degrade upon annealing at elevated temperatures. Therefore, the copolymer approach outlined here may be one promising step toward an optimum balance between a sufficient processability of the polymers from common organic solvents, a high solid state order, and applicable OFET performances.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Organic Electronics and Photovoltaics · Conducting polymers and applications · Nanowire Synthesis and Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Institute of Physics, University of Potsdam, Am Neuen Palais 10, D-14469 Potsdam, Germany, and Macromolecular Chemistry, University of Wuppertal, Gauss-Str. 20, D-42097 Wuppertal, Germany
References (23)
Show source-provided references
1. Tsumura A. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 1986 · 49 · 121010.1063/1.97417 ↗
2. Sirringhaus H. · Science · 1998 · 280 · 174110.1126/science.280.5370.1741 ↗
3. Sirringhaus H. · Nature · 1999 · 401 · 68510.1038/44359 ↗
4. Ong B. S. · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2004 · 126 · 337810.1021/ja039772w ↗
5. Kline R. J. · J. Adv. Mater. · 2003 · 15 · 151910.1002/adma.200305275 ↗
6. Zen A. · Adv. Funct. Mater. · 2004 · 14 · 75710.1002/adfm.200400017 ↗
7. Bao Z. · J. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 1996 · 69 · 410810.1063/1.117834 ↗
8. Prosa T. J. · J. Macromolecules · 1992 · 25 · 436410.1021/ma00043a019 ↗
9. Bao Z. · J. Mater. Chem. · 1999 · 9 · 189510.1039/a902652e ↗
10. Katz H. E. · J. Phys. Chem. B · 2000 · 104 · 67110.1021/jp992853n ↗
11. Bao Z. · J. Chem. Mater. · 1999 · 11 · 260710.1021/cm990290m ↗
12. Lim W. Y. · IECE Transactions on Electronic · 2000 · 83 · 1071
13. Ploetner M. · J. Synth. Met. · 2004 · 147 · 29910.1016/j.synthmet.2004.05.034 ↗
14. Babel A. · J. Phys. Chem. B · 2003 · 107 · 174910.1021/jp0215062 ↗
15. Babel A. · Macromolecules · 2003 · 36 · 775910.1021/ma034717t ↗
16. Sperling L. H. · 2001
17. Loewe R. S. · Adv. Mater. · 1999 · 3 · 25010.1002/(SICI)1521-4095(199903)11:3<250::AID-ADMA250>3.0.CO;2-J ↗
18. Loewe R. S. · Polym. Prepr. · 1999 · 40 · 852
19. Inganäs O. · Synth. Met. · 1988 · 22 · 39510.1016/0379-6779(88)90110-5 ↗
20. Inganäs O. · 1997
21. Suh K. W. · 1967
22. Brown P. J. · Phys. Rev. B · 2003 · 67 · 06420310.1103/PhysRevB.67.064203 ↗
23. Pal S. · Macromolecules · 2003 · 36 · 842610.1021/ma034702v ↗