Control of the Morphology of Complex Semiconductor Nanocrystals with a Type II Heterojunction, Dots vs Peanuts, by Thermal Cycling
Source abstract
Abstract
Type II CdSe/CdTe core/shell nanocrystals with a dot shape were synthesized using a modified SILAR technique that incorporates cycling of the reaction temperature (thermal cycling). Conversely, experimental results revealed that the standard SILAR alone produced type II core/shell nanocrystals in a peanut shape (1D). Despite their differences in shape, the optical properties observed for the type II dot- and peanut-shaped core/shell nanocrystals were similar. The dot-shaped nanocrystals were confirmed as core/shell structures with an abrupt type II heterojunction within the experimental accuracy, and the peanut-shaped ones were found to be consistent with CdSe and CdTe separated on the two ends of the rods. Similar techniques were used for the synthesis of CdS/CdSe/CdTe type II colloidal quantum well heterostructures with dot and peanut shapes. For these type II colloidal quantum well structures, the PL peak positions were shown to be readily tunable by varying the CdSe and CdTe shell thickness, something not typically seen for the quantum dots. The PL quantum yield of these nanocrystals were found to range between 30 and 60%.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Quantum Dots Synthesis And Properties · Chalcogenide Semiconductor Thin Films · Copper-based nanomaterials and applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Chemistry & Biochemistry, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, Arkansas 72701, NN-Labs LLC, Fayetteville, Arkansas 72703, Joint Materials Research Science & Engineering Center at the University of Oklahoma and the University of Arkansas, and the Homer L. Dodge Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma 73019
References (28)
Show source-provided references
1. Murray C. B. · Ann. Rev. Mater. Sci. · 2000 · 30 · 54510.1146/annurev.matsci.30.1.545 ↗
2. Peng X. · Struct. Bonding · 2005 · 118 · 7910.1007/b137472 ↗
3. Kittel C. · 1988 · 1
4. Herman M. A. · 199610.1007/978-3-642-80060-3 ↗
5. Hines M. A. · J. Phys. Chem. · 1996 · 100 · 46810.1021/jp9530562 ↗
6. Li J. J. · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2003 · 125 · 1256710.1021/ja0363563 ↗
7. Park S. · Science · 2002 · 297 · 6510.1126/science.1072009 ↗
8. Battaglia D. · Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. · 2003 · 42 · 503510.1002/anie.200352120 ↗
9. Battaglia D. · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2005 · 127 · 1088910.1021/ja0437297 ↗
10. Xie R. · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2005 · 127 · 748010.1021/ja042939g ↗
11. Kim S. · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2003 · 125 · 1146610.1021/ja0361749 ↗
12. Balet L. P. · Nano Lett. · 2004 · 4 · 148510.1021/nl049146c ↗
13. Chen C.-Y. · Small · 2005 · 1 · 1220
14. Cheng C.-T. · J. Mater. Chem. · 2005 · 15 · 340910.1039/b503681j ↗
15. Li J. J. · Chem. Phys. · 2005 · 318 · 8210.1016/j.chemphys.2005.04.029 ↗
16. Xie R. · Adv. Mater. · 2005 · 17 · 274110.1002/adma.200501029 ↗
17. Yu K. · Small · 2005 · 1 · 33210.1002/smll.200400069 ↗
18. Wang C. H. · J. Appl. Phys. · 2006 · 99 · 1
19. Kim S. · Nat. Biotechnol. · 2004 · 22 · 9310.1038/nbt920 ↗
20. Talapin D. V. · Nano Lett. · 2003 · 3 · 167710.1021/nl034815s ↗
21. Kudera S. · Nano Lett. · 2005 · 5 · 44510.1021/nl048060g ↗
22. Kanaras A. G. · Nano Lett. · 2005 · 5 · 216410.1021/nl0518728 ↗
23. Halpert J. E. · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2006 · 128 · 1259010.1021/ja0616534 ↗
24. Manna L. · Nat. Mater. · 2003 · 2 · 38210.1038/nmat902 ↗
25. Yu W. W. · Chem. Mater. · 2003 · 15 · 430010.1021/cm034729t ↗
26. Peng Z. A. · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2002 · 124 · 334310.1021/ja0173167 ↗
27. Wickham J. N. · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2000 · 84 · 92310.1103/PhysRevLett.84.923 ↗
28. Bailey R. E. · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2003 · 125 · 710010.1021/ja035000o ↗