journal article·2025-08-01

Study of the effect of the gate’s length on the electrical quality of AlGaN/GaN heterostructures based HEMTs

Department of Preparatory Classes, Higher School of Saharan Agriculture, Adrar 01000, Algeria, M. Mostefaoui, A. H. Kacha, Applied Microelectronics Laboratory, Department of Electronics, Djillali Liabes University, BP89, Sidi Bel Abbes 22000, Algeria, A. Rabehi, Telecommunications and Smart Systems Laboratory, University of Djelfa, PO Box 3117, 17000, Djelfa, Algeria, K. Ameur, Applied Microelectronics Laboratory, Department of Electronics, Djillali Liabes University, BP89, Sidi Bel Abbes 22000, Algeria, H. Mazari, Applied Microelectronics Laboratory, Department of Electronics, Djillali Liabes University, BP89, Sidi Bel Abbes 22000, Algeria, J. M. Bluet, Université de Lyon, Institut des Nanotechnologies de Lyon INL-UMR5270, CNRS, INSA de Lyon, Villeurbanne F-69621, France

Journal of Ovonic Research· Volume 21· Issue 4
Publisher page

Abstract

This study examines the influence of gate length variation on the electrical properties of AlGaN/GaN High Electron Mobility Transistors (HEMTs), with a focus on Schottky gate characteristics. Devices with gate lengths of 1 µm, 20 µm, 30 µm, and 100 µm were analyzed using I-V measurements to extract key electrical parameters, including series resistance, ideality factor, Schottky barrier height, and leakage current. The results reveal that shorter gate lengths, particularly 1 µm, exhibit a high ideality factor (n = 7.51) and substantial series resistance (Rs ≈ 1.15×109 Ω), indicating dominant trap-assisted tunneling and recombination effects. In contrast, the 100 µm device demonstrates superior performance, with a lower ideality factor (n = 1.12) and reduced leakage current. The Schottky barrier height varies from 0.640 eV (30 µm) to 0.743 eV (100 µm), while leakage current increases significantly in shorter gate devices, reaching 5.50×10⁻¹⁰ A at 1 µm. These findings highlight the crucial role of gate length optimization in improving the performance of GaN-based HEMTs for high-frequency and high-power applications, contributing to the development of next-generation GaN transistors with enhanced efficiency and reliability.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: GaN-based semiconductor devices and materials · Silicon Carbide Semiconductor Technologies · ZnO doping and properties

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (18)

Show source-provided references
1. [1] B. Kim, S. Park, S.R. Hall, Materials, 17(22), 5515 (2024); https://doi.org/10.3390/ma1722551510.3390/ma17225515 ↗
2. [2] A. Akshaykranth, J. Ajayan, S. Bhattacharya, D. Nirmal, S, Results Eng. 25 ,104151, (2025); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2025.10415110.1016/j.rineng.2025.104151 ↗
3. [3] M. Pilati, M. Buffolo, F. Rampazzo, B. Lambert, D. Sommer, J. Grünenpütt, C. De Santi, G. Meneghesso, E. Zanoni, M. Meneghini, Microelectron. Reliab. 150 ,1-5, (2023); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.microrel.2023.11513110.1016/j.microrel.2023.115131 ↗
4. [4] S. Milazzo, G. Greco, S. Di, P. Fiorenza, F. Giannazzo, C. Bongiorno, L. Gervasi, S. Mirabella, F. Iucolano, F. Roccaforte, Applied Surface Science, 15(679), 161316 (2025); 504 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2024.16131610.1016/j.apsusc.2024.161316 ↗
5. [5] J. Osvald, T. Lalinský, G. Vanko, Appl. Surf. Sci, 15(461), 206-211(2018); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.06.11310.1016/j.apsusc.2018.06.113 ↗
6. [6] M. Whiteside, S. Arulkumaran, Y. Dikme, A. Sandupatla, G.I. Ng, Materials Science & Engineering B, 262 114707 (2020); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mseb.2020.11470710.1016/j.mseb.2020.114707 ↗
7. [7] Z. Xi, Y. Wang, X. Fei, B. Sun, H. Huang, Y. Song, F. Cao, Nucl. Eng. Technol. 57, 103538, (2025); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.net.2025.10353810.1016/j.net.2025.103538 ↗
8. [8] R. Baca-arroyo, e-Prime - Advances in Electrical Engineering, 11, 100954 (2025); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prime.2025.10095410.1016/j.prime.2025.100954 ↗
9. [9] M. Wzorek, M. Ekielski, E. Brzozowski, A. Taube, Semicond. Process. 153 (2023) 107157; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mssp.2022.10715710.1016/j.mssp.2022.107157 ↗
10. [10] C. Tang, G. Xie, K. Sheng, Microelectronics Reliability, 2 (55), 347-351, (2015); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.microrel.2014.10.01810.1016/j.microrel.2014.10.018 ↗
11. [11] C. Sharma, A.K. Visvkarma, R. Laishram, A. Kumar, D.S. Rawal, S. Vinayak, R. Singh, Microelectronics Reliability 105, 113565, (2020); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.microrel.2019.11356510.1016/j.microrel.2019.113565 ↗
12. [12] S. Chakraborty, T. Kim, Transistors 13(1), 84 (2022); https://doi.org/10.3390/mi1301008410.3390/mi13010084 ↗
13. [13] U.K. Mishra, P. Parikh, Y. Wu, Proceedings of the IEEE, 6 (90), 1022 - 1031, (2002); https://doi.org/10.1109/JPROC.2002.102156710.1109/JPROC.2002.1021567 ↗
14. [14] J. Pruefer, J. Leise, G. Darbandy, A. Nikolaou, H. Klauk, J.W. Borchert, B. Iñíguez, T. Gneiting, A. Kloes, S. Member, Compact Modeling of Short-Channel Effects in Staggered Organic Thin-Film Transistors, 67, 5082-5090, (2020); https://doi.org/10.1109/TED.2020.302136810.1109/TED.2020.3021368 ↗
15. [15] R. Vetury, N.Q. Zhang, S. Keller, U.K. Mishra, IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, 11(67), 560-566, (2001); https://doi.org/10.1109/16.90645110.1109/16.906451 ↗
16. [16] V.R. Reddy, C.V. Prasad, V. Janardhanam, C.J. Choi, Journal of Materials Science: Materials, 32 ,8092-8105, (2021); https://doi.org/10.1007/s10854-021-05532-210.1007/s10854-021-05532-2 ↗
17. [17] A.H. Kacha, M.N. Amroun, B. Akkal, Z. Benamara, Semiconductors. 55 ,S54-S61, (2021); https://doi.org/10.1134/S106378262109008610.1134/S1063782621090086 ↗
18. [18] Ş. Karataş, N. Berk , Optical Materials, 126, 112231 (2022); https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optmat.2022.11223110.1016/j.optmat.2022.112231 ↗