journal article·2025-03-25

Impact of SO2 on NiFe Nanoparticle Exsolution and Dissolution from LaFe0.9Ni0.1O3 Perovskite Oxides

Musa Najimu, Matthew J. Hurlock, Sahanaz Parvin, Courtney Brea, Neelesh Kumar, Yoon Jin Cho, Yiqing Wu, Guoxiang Hu, Zili Wu, Eranda Nikolla, Jonas Baltrusaitis, Tina M. Nenoff, Israel E. Wachs, Kandis Leslie Gilliard-AbdulAziz

Chemistry of Materials· Volume 37· Issue 6
Publisher page

Abstract

Ni-doped LaFeO 3 perovskite oxide is a promising cathode material for solid oxide electrolysis cells (SOECs) designed for CO 2 /H 2 O coelectrolysis. The performance of LaFe 0.9 Ni 0.1 O 3 is being investigated under real-world conditions that include exposure to acid gases, such as SO 2, relevant to SOEC operation. Experiments show that LaFe 0.9 Ni 0.1 O 3 exsolves NiFe nanoparticles, along with the formation of surface SO 4 2– and SO 3 2– after being exposed to 200 ppm of SO 2 . This suggests that the ionic diffusion of Ni 3+ and Fe 3+ between the bulk and the surface remains unaffected throughout the exsolution–dissolution–exsolution cycle. Thermochemical water splitting has been employed as a probe reaction to evaluate the catalytic properties of the exsolved NiFe nanoparticles. These nanoparticles demonstrated improved hydrogen production compared to bare perovskite oxide substrates. However, after exposure to SO 2, the formation of Fe-rich NiFe nanoparticles led to poor thermocatalytic performance and rapid deactivation of the perovskite at elevated temperatures. Density functional theory (DFT) analysis was utilized to validate the experimental findings, indicating a significantly negative reaction energy for water splitting over exsolved Fe, as well as stronger binding of SO 2 to Fe than to Ni. Computational analysis further suggests that the presence of surface sulfate promotes the formation of Fe-rich NiFe nanoparticles, aligning with the experimental results. Overall, this study clarifies how SO 2 affects the structure of SOEC perovskite oxide candidate materials. Future engineering efforts should focus on enhancing nanoparticle exsolution and sulfur resistance, which is crucial for improving the hydrogen production capacity of La-based perovskite oxides for electro- and thermocatalytic water splitting in real environments containing acid gases.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Magnetic and transport properties of perovskites and related materials · Advancements in Battery Materials · Catalytic Processes in Materials Science

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering

University of Southern California

Department of Chemical and Environmental Engineering

University of California−Riverside

Materials & Systems Design

Pacific Northwest National Laboratory

Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering

Lehigh University

School of Materials Science and Engineering, College of Engineering

Georgia Institute of Technology

Operando Molecular Spectroscopy and Catalysis Laboratory, Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering

Department of Chemical Engineering

University of Michigan

Chemical Sciences Division

Oak Ridge National Laboratory

Center for Nanophase Materials Sciences

Advanced Science and Technology

Sandia National Laboratories

Funding

Basic Energy Sciences

References (62)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/0025-5408(88)90224-310.1016/0025-5408(88)90224-3 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.ssi.2012.06.00210.1016/j.ssi.2012.06.002 ↗
3. 10.1002/eem2.1266010.1002/eem2.12660 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.matre.2021.10002310.1016/j.matre.2021.100023 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.jece.2024.11355510.1016/j.jece.2024.113555 ↗
6. 10.1038/s41524-023-00981-110.1038/s41524-023-00981-1 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.energy.2015.06.08510.1016/j.energy.2015.06.085 ↗
8. 10.1039/C5DT04822B10.1039/C5DT04822B ↗
9. 10.1002/advs.20210271310.1002/advs.202102713 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.07.04110.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.07.041 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.cattod.2021.12.01410.1016/j.cattod.2021.12.014 ↗
12. 10.1039/C6SE00097E10.1039/C6SE00097E ↗
13. 10.1073/pnas.120640710910.1073/pnas.1206407109 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.matre.2023.10019810.1016/j.matre.2023.100198 ↗
15. 10.1021/acs.accounts.3c0040410.1021/acs.accounts.3c00404 ↗
16. 10.1021/acsanm.1c0226810.1021/acsanm.1c02268 ↗
17. 10.1016/S0167-2991(00)80511-X10.1016/S0167-2991(00)80511-X ↗
18. 10.1038/srep0524610.1038/srep05246 ↗
19. 10.1007/s11244-018-1053-810.1007/s11244-018-1053-8 ↗
20. 10.3390/catal904033210.3390/catal9040332 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.jcat.2020.11.02810.1016/j.jcat.2020.11.028 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.cej.2014.08.07910.1016/j.cej.2014.08.079 ↗
23. 10.1080/0161494920801631910.1080/01614949208016319 ↗
24. 10.1016/S0926-860X(00)00763-810.1016/S0926-860X(00)00763-8 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.04.05010.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.04.050 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.ssi.2012.05.02610.1016/j.ssi.2012.05.026 ↗
27. 10.1021/acscatal.2c0557210.1021/acscatal.2c05572 ↗
28. 10.1002/aic.1707810.1002/aic.17078 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.apcatb.2016.06.07310.1016/j.apcatb.2016.06.073 ↗
30. 10.1021/acscatal.9b0422610.1021/acscatal.9b04226 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.apsadv.2021.10011210.1016/j.apsadv.2021.100112 ↗
32. 10.1103/PhysRevB.5.470910.1103/PhysRevB.5.4709 ↗
33. 10.1016/0368-2048(76)80015-110.1016/0368-2048(76)80015-1 ↗
34. 10.1002/sia.503310.1002/sia.5033 ↗
35. 10.1016/0927-0256(96)00008-010.1016/0927-0256(96)00008-0 ↗
36. 10.1103/PhysRevB.54.1116910.1103/PhysRevB.54.11169 ↗
37. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.386510.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3865 ↗
38. 10.1103/PhysRevB.50.1795310.1103/PhysRevB.50.17953 ↗
39. 10.1021/acssuschemeng.8b0613210.1021/acssuschemeng.8b06132 ↗
40. 10.1021/jp905615c10.1021/jp905615c ↗
41. 10.1039/C3CP53943A10.1039/C3CP53943A ↗
42. 10.1021/am508976410.1021/am5089764 ↗
43. 10.3390/ma1314309910.3390/ma13143099 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.cherd.2010.11.01310.1016/j.cherd.2010.11.013 ↗
45. 10.1166/jnn.2014.828210.1166/jnn.2014.8282 ↗
46. 10.1016/0020-0891(93)90117-P10.1016/0020-0891(93)90117-P ↗
47. 10.1016/j.apcata.2008.02.02810.1016/j.apcata.2008.02.028 ↗
48. Liu, Y.; Wang, A.; Freemen, J. J.Raman, MIR, and NIR Spectroscopic Study of Calcium Sulfates: Gypsum, Bassanite, and Anhydrite. In 40th Annual Lunar and Planetary Science Conference 2009; p 2128.
49. 10.1149/2.0091906jes10.1149/2.0091906jes ↗
50. 10.1039/C6RA22719H10.1039/C6RA22719H ↗
51. 10.1021/acsami.7b0892210.1021/acsami.7b08922 ↗
52. 10.1007/s00339-016-0651-110.1007/s00339-016-0651-1 ↗
53. 10.1103/PhysRevB.94.21410310.1103/PhysRevB.94.214103 ↗
54. 10.1039/D1CP05501A10.1039/D1CP05501A ↗
55. 10.1063/1.346495810.1063/1.3464958 ↗
56. 10.1103/PhysRevB.59.414610.1103/PhysRevB.59.4146 ↗
57. 10.1088/0953-8984/3/21/01410.1088/0953-8984/3/21/014 ↗
58. 10.1103/PhysRevB.47.1139110.1103/PhysRevB.47.11391 ↗
59. 10.1016/0038-1098(89)90520-610.1016/0038-1098(89)90520-6 ↗
60. 10.1016/j.tca.2005.06.01310.1016/j.tca.2005.06.013 ↗
61. 10.3390/molecules2818673910.3390/molecules28186739 ↗
62. 10.1016/j.susc.2014.04.00610.1016/j.susc.2014.04.006 ↗