Machine Learning Models for Predicting Molecular Diffusion in Metal–Organic Frameworks Accounting for the Impact of Framework Flexibility
Source abstract
Abstract
Molecular diffusion in MOFs plays an important role in determining whether equilibrium can be reached in adsorption-based chemical separations and is a key driving force in membrane-based separations. Molecular dynamics (MD) simulations have shown that in some cases inclusion of framework flexibility in MOF changes predicted molecular diffusivities by orders of magnitude relative to more efficient MD simulations using rigid structures. Despite this, all previous efforts to predict molecular diffusion in MOFs in a high-throughput way have relied on MD data from rigid structures. We use a diverse data set of MD simulations in flexible and rigid MOFs to develop a classification model that reliably predicts whether framework flexibility has a strong impact on molecular diffusion in a given MOF/molecule pair. We then combine this approach with previous high-throughput MD simulations to develop a reliable model that efficiently predicts molecular diffusivities in cases in which framework flexibility can be neglected. The use of this approach is illustrated by making predictions of molecular diffusivities in ∼70,000 MOF/molecule pairs for molecules relevant to gas separations.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Metal-Organic Frameworks: Synthesis and Applications · Machine Learning in Materials Science · Zeolite Catalysis and Synthesis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Chemical & Biomolecular Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia 30332-0100, United States
School of Chemical Engineering and Technology, Hainan University, Haikou 570228, China
Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831, United States
Funding
Basic Energy Sciences
References (64)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1039/D2CS00031H10.1039/D2CS00031H ↗
2. 10.1038/nmat486010.1038/nmat4860 ↗
3. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.5b0383610.1021/acs.chemmater.5b03836 ↗
4. 10.1080/08927022.2013.82922810.1080/08927022.2013.829228 ↗
5. 10.1039/C7CS00153C10.1039/C7CS00153C ↗
6. 10.1021/acs.cgd.7b0028710.1021/acs.cgd.7b00287 ↗
7. 10.1021/cm502594j10.1021/cm502594j ↗
8. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.7b0044110.1021/acs.chemmater.7b00441 ↗
9. 10.1039/D1TA09267G10.1039/D1TA09267G ↗
10. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.8b0541610.1021/acs.jpcc.8b05416 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.memsci.2020.11855510.1016/j.memsci.2020.118555 ↗
12. 10.1021/acsami.1c1852110.1021/acsami.1c18521 ↗
13. 10.1021/acsami.2c0897710.1021/acsami.2c08977 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.cej.2022.13678310.1016/j.cej.2022.136783 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.memsci.2019.11767510.1016/j.memsci.2019.117675 ↗
16. 10.1039/C6TA06262H10.1039/C6TA06262H ↗
17. 10.1039/C8EE02582G10.1039/C8EE02582G ↗
18. 10.1021/acsami.8b0460010.1021/acsami.8b04600 ↗
19. 10.1002/anie.20060174610.1002/anie.200601746 ↗
20. 10.1002/adma.20100206610.1002/adma.201002066 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.micromeso.2009.10.01710.1016/j.micromeso.2009.10.017 ↗
22. 10.1002/cphc.20120052910.1002/cphc.201200529 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.micromeso.2014.03.02710.1016/j.micromeso.2014.03.027 ↗
24. 10.1021/jp500796e10.1021/jp500796e ↗
25. 10.1016/j.ces.2015.03.01610.1016/j.ces.2015.03.016 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.micromeso.2011.08.02010.1016/j.micromeso.2011.08.020 ↗
27. 10.1021/ct400976610.1021/ct4009766 ↗
28. 10.1080/08927022.2015.101008210.1080/08927022.2015.1010082 ↗
29. 10.3390/nano903046710.3390/nano9030467 ↗
30. 10.1021/acs.jced.9b0083510.1021/acs.jced.9b00835 ↗
31. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.9b1095510.1021/acs.jpcc.9b10955 ↗
32. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.1c0526610.1021/acs.jpcc.1c05266 ↗
33. 10.1021/ar040219910.1021/ar0402199 ↗
34. 10.1021/jp051771y10.1021/jp051771y ↗
35. 10.1016/j.fuel.2019.04.06510.1016/j.fuel.2019.04.065 ↗
36. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.06590110.1103/PhysRevLett.102.065901 ↗
37. 10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.3.06380110.1103/PhysRevMaterials.3.063801 ↗
38. 10.1021/jp404287t10.1021/jp404287t ↗
39. 10.1016/S0166-1280(09)80008-010.1016/S0166-1280(09)80008-0 ↗
40. 10.1080/00268976.2018.153514310.1080/00268976.2018.1535143 ↗
41. 10.1023/A:101162572880310.1023/A:1011625728803 ↗
42. 10.1021/j100031a03410.1021/j100031a034 ↗
43. 10.1016/0009-2614(82)80009-210.1016/0009-2614(82)80009-2 ↗
44. 10.1021/ja00402a07110.1021/ja00402a071 ↗
45. 10.1063/1.43459310.1063/1.434593 ↗
46. 10.1002/9780470125793.ch910.1002/9780470125793.ch9 ↗
47. 10.1021/ci990307l10.1021/ci990307l ↗
48. 10.1021/jm000942e10.1021/jm000942e ↗
49. RDKit: Open-source cheminformatics, 2006 https://www.RDKit.org.
50. 10.1111/j.1469-1809.1936.tb02137.x10.1111/j.1469-1809.1936.tb02137.x ↗
51. 10.1007/978-1-4419-9878-1_410.1007/978-1-4419-9878-1_4 ↗
52. Pedregosa F. · J. Mach. Learn. Res. · 2011 · 12 · 2825
53. 10.1002/978111864610610.1002/9781118646106 ↗
54. Sundararajan, M.; Najmi, A. The many Shapley values for model explanation. In Proceedings of the 37th International Conference on Machine Learning; 2020.
55. 10.1515/9781400881970-01810.1515/9781400881970-018 ↗
56. 10.1016/j.cej.2022.13478410.1016/j.cej.2022.134784 ↗
57. 10.1016/j.chempr.2019.10.01210.1016/j.chempr.2019.10.012 ↗
58. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.5b0113510.1021/acs.jpclett.5b01135 ↗
59. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.2c0417510.1021/acs.jpcc.2c04175 ↗
60. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.3c0152410.1021/acs.jpclett.3c01524 ↗
61. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b0339310.1021/acs.jpcc.6b03393 ↗
62. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.9b0622810.1021/acs.jpcc.9b06228 ↗
63. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.1c0692410.1021/acs.jpcc.1c06924 ↗
64. 10.1021/acsami.3c0715810.1021/acsami.3c07158 ↗