Suture materials affect peri-implant bone healing and implant osseointegration
Source abstract
Abstract
The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of the remnants of two suture materials on osseointegration of titanium implants in a rabbit tibial model. Calibrated defects were prepared in the tibia of five Chinchilla rabbits. Filaments of nonresorbable (NR) nylon or resorbable (R) chitosan were placed at the bone to implant interface, whereas control sites had no suture material. After a healing period of 4 weeks, a pull-out test procedure was performed followed by enzymatic analyses of the wound fluid and relative quantification of mRNA levels for bone-related and cytokine markers from the peri-implant bone. A trend toward a reduced pull-out force was observed in the NR group (NR: 23.0 ± 12.8 N; R: 33.9 ± 11.3 N; control: 33.6 ± 24.0 N). Similarly, the bone resorption marker vacuolar type H+-ATPase was increased in the NR group compared with that in the control group (P = 0.041). The R group showed trends for lower alkaline phosphatase activity and osteocalcin expression and higher total protein content and RNA compared with the control group. In this submerged healing model, peri-implant bone healing was marginally affected by the two suture materials tested. However, there was a tendency toward better osseointegration and lower expression of bone resorption markers in the R group compared with the control group.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Surgical Sutures and Adhesives · Dental materials and restorations · Bone Tissue Engineering Materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Biomaterials, Institute of Clinical Dentistry, University of Oslo
Group of Cell Therapy and Tissue Engineering, Research Institute on Health Sciences (IUNICS), University of Balearic Islands
Department of Prosthodontics, Institute of Clinical Dentistry, University of Oslo
References (40)
Show source-provided references
1. 1. Wilson TG Jr (2009) The positive relationship between excess cement and peri-implant disease: a prospective clinical endoscopic study. J Periodontol 80, 1388-1392.10.1902/jop.2009.090115 ↗
2. 2. Zarb GA, Schmitt A (1990) The longitudinal clinical effectiveness of osseointegrated dental implants: the Toronto study. Part III: problems and complications encountered. J Prosthet Dent 64, 185-194.10.1016/0022-3913(90)90177-E ↗
3. 3. Ivanoff CJ, Widmark G (2001) Nonresorbable versus resorbable sutures in oral implant surgery: a prospective clinical study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 3, 57-60.10.1111/j.1708-8208.2001.tb00129.x ↗
4. 4. Varma S, Ferguson HL, Breen H, Lumb WV (1974) Comparison of seven suture materials in infected wounds--an experimental study. J Surg Res 17, 165-170.10.1016/0022-4804(74)90103-6 ↗
5. 5. Lilly GE, Cutcher JL, Jones JC, Armstrong JH (1972) Reaction of oral tissues to suture materials. IV. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 33, 152-157.10.1016/0030-4220(72)90221-6 ↗
6. 6. Selvig KA, Biagiotti GR, Leknes KN, Wikesjö UM (1998) Oral tissue reactions to suture materials. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 18, 474-487.
7. 7. Lilly GE, Armstrong JH, Salem JE, Cutcher JL (1968) Reaction of oral tissues to suture materials. Part II. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 26, 592-599.10.1016/0030-4220(68)90343-5 ↗
8. 8. Moy RL, Waldman B, Hein DW (1992) A review of sutures and suturing techniques. J Dermatol Surg Oncol 18, 785-795.10.1111/j.1524-4725.1992.tb03036.x ↗
9. 9. Blomstedt B, Osterberg B, Bergstrand A (1977) Suture material and bacterial transport. An experimental study. Acta Chir Scand 143, 71-73.
10. 10. Bennett RG (1988) Selection of wound closure materials. J Am Acad Dermatol 18, 619-637.10.1016/S0190-9622(88)70083-3 ↗
11. 11. Singh DK, Ray AR (2000) Biomedical applications of chitin, chitosan, and their derivatives. Polym Rev 40, 69-83.10.1081/MC-100100579 ↗
12. 12. Pillai CKS, Sharma CP (2010) Review paper: absorbable polymeric surgical sutures: chemistry, production, properties, biodegradability, and performance. J Biomater Appl 25, 291-366.10.1177/0885328210384890 ↗
13. 13. Muzzarelli R, Tarsi R, Filippini O, Giovanetti E, Biagini G, Varaldo PE (1990) Antimicrobial properties of N-carboxybutyl chitosan. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 34, 2019-2023.10.1128/AAC.34.10.2019 ↗
14. 14. Shin Y, Yoo DI, Jang J (2001) Molecular weight effect on antimicrobial activity of chitosan treated cotton fabrics. J Appl Polym Sci 80, 2495-2501.10.1002/app.1357 ↗
15. 15. Lim SH, Hudson SM (2003) Review of chitosan and its derivatives as antimicrobial agents and their uses as textile chemicals. Polym Rev 43, 223-269.10.1081/MC-120020161 ↗
16. 16. Chou TC, Fu E, Shen EC (2003) Chitosan inhibits prostaglandin E2 formation and cyclooxygenase-2 induction in lipopolysaccharide-treated RAW 264.7 macrophages. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 308, 403-407.10.1016/S0006-291X(03)01407-4 ↗
17. 17. Muzzarelli R, Biagini G, Pugnaloni A, Filippini O, Baldassarre V, Castaldini C et al. (1989) Reconstruction of parodontal tissue with chitosan. Biomaterials 10, 598-603.10.1016/0142-9612(89)90113-0 ↗
18. 18. Muzzarelli RA, Biagini G, Bellardini M, Simonelli L, Castaldini C, Fratto G (1993) Osteoconduction exerted by methylpyrrolidinone chitosan used in dental surgery. Biomaterials 14, 39-43.10.1016/0142-9612(93)90073-B ↗
19. 20. Muzzarelli RA, Mattioli-Belmonte M, Tietz C, Biagini R, Ferioli G, Brunelli MA et al. (1994) Stimulatory effect on bone formation exerted by a modified chitosan. Biomaterials 15, 1075-1081.10.1016/0142-9612(94)90093-0 ↗
20. 21. Viju S, Thilagavathi G (2013) Effect of chitosan coating on the characteristics of silk-braided sutures. J Ind Text 42, 256-268.10.1177/1528083711435713 ↗
21. 22. Minagawa T, Okamura Y, Shigemasa Y, Minami S, Okamoto Y (2007) Effects of molecular weight and deacetylation degree of chitin/chitosan on wound healing. Carbohydr Polym 67, 640-644.10.1016/j.carbpol.2006.07.007 ↗
22. 23. Ueno H, Yamada H, Tanaka I, Kaba N, Matsuura M, Okumura M et al. (1999) Accelerating effects of chitosan for healing at early phase of experimental open wound in dogs. Biomaterials 20, 1407-1414.10.1016/S0142-9612(99)00046-0 ↗
23. 24. Okamoto Y, Shibazaki K, Minami S, Matsuhashi A, Tanioka S, Shigemasa Y (1995) Evaluation of chitin and chitosan on open would healing in dogs. J Vet Med Sci 57, 851-854.10.1292/jvms.57.851 ↗
24. 25. Legrand C, Bour JM, Jacob C, Capiaumont J, Martial A, Marc A et al. (1992) Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) activity of the cultured eukaryotic cells as marker of the number of dead cells in the medium. J Biotechnol 25, 231-243.10.1016/0168-1656(92)90158-6 ↗
25. 26. Monjo M, Lamolle SF, Lyngstadaas SP, Rönold HJ, Ellingsen JE (2008) In vivo expression of osteogenic markers and bone mineral density at the surface of fluoride-modified titanium implants. Biomaterials 29, 3771-3780.10.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.06.001 ↗
26. 27. Monjo M, Rubert M, Ellingsen JE, Lyngstadaas SP (2010) Rosuvastatin promotes osteoblast differentiation and regulates SLCO1A1 transporter gene expression in MC3T3-E1 cells. Cell Physiol Biochem 26, 647-656.10.1159/000322332 ↗
27. 28. Pfaffl MW (2001) A new mathematical model for relative quantification in real-time RT-PCR. Nucleic Acids Res 29, e45.10.1093/nar/29.9.e45 ↗
28. 29. Pfaffl MW, Tichopad A, Prgomet C, Neuvians TP (2004) Determination of stable housekeeping genes, differentially regulated target genes and sample integrity: BestKeeper--Excel-based tool using pair-wise correlations. Biotechnol Lett 26, 509-515.10.1023/B:BILE.0000019559.84305.47 ↗
29. 30. Javed F, Al-Askar M, Almas K, Romanos GE, Al-Hezaimi K (2012) Tissue reactions to various suture materials used in oral surgical interventions. ISRN Dent 2012, 762095.10.5402/2012/762095 ↗
30. 31. Huang GK (1990) An experimental study of arterial microautografts. Eur J Plast Surg 13, 148-151.10.1007/BF00236363 ↗
31. 32. Huang GK, Li HQ, Wu XM (1995) Study on microvascular anastomosis of arteries with absorbable polyglyconate suture. Microsurgery 16, 505-509.10.1002/micr.1920160713 ↗
32. 33. Blair HC, Teitelbaum SL, Ghiselli R, Gluck S (1989) Osteoclastic bone resorption by a polarized vacuolar proton pump. Science 245, 855-857.10.1126/science.2528207 ↗
33. 34. Postlethwait RW, Smith BM (1975) A new synthetic absorbable suture. Surg Gynecol Obstet 140, 377-380.
34. 35. Pillai CKS, Paul W, Sharma CP (2009) Chitin and chitosan polymers: chemistry, solubility and fiber formation. Prog Polym Sci 34, 641-678.10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2009.04.001 ↗
35. 36. Yang YM, Hu W, Wang XD, Gu XS (2007) The controlling biodegradation of chitosan fibers by N-acetylation in vitro and in vivo. J Mater Sci Mater Med 18, 2117-2121.10.1007/s10856-007-3013-x ↗
36. 37. Monjo M, Ramis JM, Rønold HJ, Taxt-Lamolle SF, Ellingsen JE, Lyngstadaas SP (2013) Correlation between molecular signals and bone bonding to titanium implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 24, 1035-1043.10.1111/j.1600-0501.2012.02496.x ↗
37. 38. Mathews S, Gupta PK, Bhonde R, Totey S (2011) Chitosan enhances mineralization during osteoblast differentiation of human bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells, by upregulating the associated genes. Cell Prolif 44, 537-549.10.1111/j.1365-2184.2011.00788.x ↗
38. 39. Yang X, Chen X, Wang H (2009) Acceleration of osteogenic differentiation of preosteoblastic cells by chitosan containing nanofibrous scaffolds. Biomacromolecules 10, 2772-2778.10.1021/bm900623j ↗
39. 40. Shin SY, Park HN, Kim KH, Lee MH, Choi YS, Park YJ et al. (2005) Biological evaluation of chitosan nanofiber membrane for guided bone regeneration. J Periodontol 76, 1778-1784.10.1902/jop.2005.76.10.1778 ↗
40. 41. Boskey AL, Gadaleta S, Gundberg C, Doty SB, Ducy P, Karsenty G (1998) Fourier transform infrared microspectroscopic analysis of bones of osteocalcin-deficient mice provides insight into the function of osteocalcin. Bone 23, 187-196.10.1016/S8756-3282(98)00092-1 ↗