Computational Design of Metal–Organic Frameworks with Unprecedented High Hydrogen Working Capacity and High Synthesizability
Source abstract
Abstract
Compared to conventional computational screening studies that are limited by the size of database, inverse design has a great potential to facilitate identifying new materials with optimal properties. In this work, we integrate machine learning with genetic algorithm to computationally design metal–organic frameworks (MOFs) for hydrogen storage applications at cryogenic conditions. As such, we identified 6277 MOFs that exceed the current record (37.2 g/L of NPF-200) at operating conditions between 5 and 100 bar at 77 K. MOFs, whose working capacities exceed 40.0 g/L (system-based 2025 DOE target) were also identified, where the highest working capacity obtained from this work was 41.6 g/L, which is higher than any other hypothetical MOFs reported thus far. Furthermore, synthesizability of the top performing structures was assessed by comparing relative stability with their polymorphic structures while taking into account the possibility of interpenetration. We demonstrate that our methodology can successfully design MOFs with both high hydrogen capacity and synthesizability and we anticipate our workflow can be widely applied to various other materials and applications.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Metal-Organic Frameworks: Synthesis and Applications · Machine Learning in Materials Science · Catalytic Processes in Materials Science
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST), 291 Daehak-ro, Yuseong-gu, Daejeon 34141, Republic of Korea
Funding
National Research Foundation of Korea
References (56)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1039/c1fd00105a10.1039/c1fd00105a ↗
2. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.03.04110.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.03.041 ↗
3. US Department of Energy · 2017
4. 10.1016/j.matpr.2020.03.67910.1016/j.matpr.2020.03.679 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.fuproc.2018.06.01310.1016/j.fuproc.2018.06.013 ↗
6. 10.1149/08613.0003ecst10.1149/08613.0003ecst ↗
7. 10.1002/tee.2232810.1002/tee.22328 ↗
8. Rahman, K.; Jurkovic, S.; Savagian, P. J.; Patel, N.; Dawsey, R. Retrospective of Electric Machines for EV and HEV Traction Applications at General Motors. In Proceedings ECCE 2016-IEEE Energy Conversion Congress and Exposition, 2016.10.1109/ECCE.2016.7855402 ↗
9. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.6b0493310.1021/acs.chemmater.6b04933 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2017.03.00110.1016/j.pmatsci.2017.03.001 ↗
11. 10.1038/s41467-019-09365-w10.1038/s41467-019-09365-w ↗
12. 10.1021/jp412232610.1021/jp4122326 ↗
13. 10.1039/C7EE02477K10.1039/C7EE02477K ↗
14. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.06.02110.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.06.021 ↗
15. 10.1007/s11242-020-01527-510.1007/s11242-020-01527-5 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.patter.2021.10029110.1016/j.patter.2021.100291 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.cjph.2020.01.01110.1016/j.cjph.2020.01.011 ↗
18. 10.1080/08927022.2021.191601410.1080/08927022.2021.1916014 ↗
19. 10.1038/nmat333610.1038/nmat3336 ↗
20. 10.1021/acsami.7b1803710.1021/acsami.7b18037 ↗
21. 10.1021/acsami.1c0247110.1021/acsami.1c02471 ↗
22. 10.1021/acs.cgd.7b0084810.1021/acs.cgd.7b00848 ↗
23. 10.1038/nchem.119210.1038/nchem.1192 ↗
24. 10.1038/s42256-020-00271-110.1038/s42256-020-00271-1 ↗
25. 10.1126/sciadv.aax932410.1126/sciadv.aax9324 ↗
26. 10.1021/ct300369910.1021/ct3003699 ↗
27. 10.1080/08927022.2015.101008210.1080/08927022.2015.1010082 ↗
28. 10.1021/ja00051a04010.1021/ja00051a040 ↗
29. 10.1002/cphc.20090045910.1002/cphc.200900459 ↗
30. 10.1063/1.304832010.1063/1.3048320 ↗
31. 10.3390/ijms1004160110.3390/ijms10041601 ↗
32. 10.1021/acs.jctc.5b0065310.1021/acs.jctc.5b00653 ↗
33. 10.1021/cm502594j10.1021/cm502594j ↗
34. 10.1021/ar800124u10.1021/ar800124u ↗
35. Mikolov, T.; Chen, K.; Corrado, G.; Dean, J. Efficient Estimation of Word Representations in Vector Space. In 1st International Conference on Learning Representations ICLR 2013-Workshop Track Proceedings, 2013.
36. 10.1039/c8me00050f10.1039/c8me00050f ↗
37. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.8b0942010.1021/acs.jpcc.8b09420 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.ces.2022.11781310.1016/j.ces.2022.117813 ↗
39. BIOVIA. Dassault Systémes Biovia Materials Studio 2017R2; Dassault Systèmes: San Diego, 2017.
40. 10.1002/adma.20190799510.1002/adma.201907995 ↗
41. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.0c0074410.1021/acs.chemmater.0c00744 ↗
42. 10.1039/D1TA03129E10.1039/D1TA03129E ↗
43. 10.1039/C9SC03916C10.1039/C9SC03916C ↗
44. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b0872910.1021/acs.jpcc.6b08729 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.01.02010.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.01.020 ↗
46. 10.1021/cg301319u10.1021/cg301319u ↗
47. 10.1002/anie.20120120210.1002/anie.201201202 ↗
48. 10.1039/c3ta00115f10.1039/c3ta00115f ↗
49. 10.1021/ic902194g10.1021/ic902194g ↗
50. 10.1039/c1ce05354j10.1039/c1ce05354j ↗
51. 10.1021/jp302356q10.1021/jp302356q ↗
52. 10.1002/chem.20150518510.1002/chem.201505185 ↗
53. 10.1038/nmat244510.1038/nmat2445 ↗
54. 10.1038/nchem.243010.1038/nchem.2430 ↗
55. Verma G. · 2020 · 378
56. 10.1016/j.tet.2008.06.03610.1016/j.tet.2008.06.036 ↗