journal article·2016Open access

Effectiveness of three methods for evaluating root canal anatomy of mandibular incisors

Marina C. Prado, Heloisa Gusman, Felipe G. Belladonna, Maíra Prado, Fabíola Ormiga

Journal of Oral Science· Volume 58· Issue 3

Abstract

This study compared the effectiveness of clinical observation, clinical microscopic observation, and tooth-clearing technique in determining the number of canals in mandibular incisors. Root canal ramifications were also analyzed. Using clinical and microscopic analyses, we determined the number of canal entrances in 277 mandibular incisors. In addition, tooth-clearing technique was used to determine the number of canals and frequency of ramifications in the samples. The kappa coefficient was used to compare the different methods with regard to frequency of canals. Most teeth had one canal entrance. The proportion of teeth with two canals was 23.5% by tooth-clearing analysis, 5.8% by clinical microscopy, and 1.1% by clinical analysis. A large number of samples had some type of ramification (40.1%), and most ramifications were present in teeth with two canals. The most frequent ramification was lateral canals (8.3%). Clinical microscopy improved identification of a second canal in mandibular incisors. However, it did not identify second canals in all teeth with two canals. (J Oral Sci 58, 347-351, 2016).
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Endodontics and Root Canal Treatments · Dental Radiography and Imaging · Dental materials and restorations

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Proclin Department, School of Dentistry, Rio de Janeiro State University

Department of Dental Clinic, School of Dentistry, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro

Department of Endodontics, Fluminense Federal University

References (28)

Show source-provided references
1. 1. Sjögren U, Hagglund B, Sundqvist G, Wing K (1990) Factors affecting the long-term results of endodontic treatment. J Endod 16, 498-504.10.1016/S0099-2399(07)80180-4 ↗
2. 2. Endal U, Shen Y, Knut A, Gao Y, Haapasalo M (2011) A high-resolution computed tomographic study of changes in root canal isthmus area by instrumentation and root filling. J Endod 37, 223-227.10.1016/j.joen.2010.10.012 ↗
3. 3. Mauger MJ, Schindler WG, Walker WA (1998) An evaluation of canal morphology at different levels of root resection in mandibular incisors. J Endod 24, 607-609.10.1016/S0099-2399(98)80120-9 ↗
4. 4. Scarfe WC, Levin MD, Gane D, Farman AG (2009) Use of cone beam computed tomography in endodontics. Int J Dent 2009: 634567.10.1155/2009/634567 ↗
5. 5. Madeira MC, Hetem S (1973) Incidence of bifurcations in mandibular incisors. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 36, 589-591.10.1016/0030-4220(73)90318-6 ↗
6. 6. De Deus QD (1975) Frequency, location, and direction of the lateral, secondary, and accessory canals. J Endod 1, 361-366.10.1016/S0099-2399(75)80211-1 ↗
7. 7. Vertucci FJ (1984) Root canal anatomy of the human permanent teeth. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 58, 589-599.10.1016/0030-4220(84)90085-9 ↗
8. 9. Karagöz-Küçükay I (1994) Root canal ramifications in mandibular incisors and efficacy of low-temperature injection thermoplasticized gutta-percha filling. J Endod 20, 236-240.10.1016/S0099-2399(06)80285-2 ↗
9. 10. Gomes BPFA, Rodrigues HH, Tancredo N (1996) The use of a modelling technique to investigate the root canal morphology of mandibular incisors. Int Endod J 29, 29-36.10.1111/j.1365-2591.1996.tb01356.x ↗
10. 11. Al-Qudah AA, Awawdeh LA (2006) Root canal morphology of mandibular incisors in a Jordanian population. Int Endod J 39, 873-877.10.1111/j.1365-2591.2006.01159.x ↗
11. 12. Leoni GB, Versiani MA, Pécora JD, Sousa-Neto MD (2014) Micro-computed tomographic analysis of the root canal morphology of mandibular incisors. J Endod 40, 710-716.10.1016/j.joen.2013.09.003 ↗
12. 13. Fernandes LMPS, Rice D, Ordinola-Zapata R, Alvares Capelozza AL, Bramante CM, Jaramillo D et al. (2014) Detection of various anatomic patterns of root canals in mandibular incisors using digital periapical radiography, 3 cone-beam computed tomographic scanners, and micro-computed tomographic imaging. J Endod 40, 42-45.10.1016/j.joen.2013.09.039 ↗
13. 14. Silva EJ, Castro RW, Nejaim Y, Silva AI, Haiter-Neto F, Silberman A et al. (2016) Evaluation of root canal configuration of maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth using cone beam computed tomography: an in-vivo study. Quintessence Int 47, 19-24.
14. 15. Plotino G, Pameijer CH, Grande NM, Somma F (2007) Ultrasonics in endodontics: a review of the literature. J Endod 33, 81-95.10.1016/j.joen.2006.10.008 ↗
15. 16. de Carvalho MC, Zuolo ML (2000) Orifice locating with a microscope. J Endod 26, 532-534.10.1097/00004770-200009000-00012 ↗
16. 17. West JD (2000) The role of the microscope in 21st century endodontics: visions of a new frontier. Dent Today 19, 62-64, 66-69.
17. 18. Carr GB, Murgel CAF (2010) The use of operating microscope in endodontics. Dent Clin North Am 54, 191-214.10.1016/j.cden.2010.01.002 ↗
18. 19. Barbosa FO, Gusman H, Araújo MCP (2009) A comparative study on the frequency, location, and direction of accessory canals filled with the hydraulic vertical condensation and continuous wave of condensation techniques. J Endod 35, 397-400.10.1016/j.joen.2008.12.009 ↗
19. 20. Kaffe I, Kaufman A, Littner MM, Lazarson A (1985) Radiographic study of the root canal system of mandibular anterior teeth. Int Endod J 18, 253-259.10.1111/j.1365-2591.1985.tb00452.x ↗
20. 21. Walker RT (1988) The root canal anatomy of mandibular incisors in a southern Chinese population. Int Endod J 21, 218-223.10.1111/j.1365-2591.1988.tb00978.x ↗
21. 22. Miyashita M, Kasahara E, Yasuda E, Yamamoto A, Sekizawa T (1997) Root canal system of the mandibular incisor. J Endod 23, 479-484.10.1016/S0099-2399(97)80305-6 ↗
22. 23. Neelakantan P, Subbarao C, Subbarao CV (2010) Comparative evaluation of modified canal staining and clearing technique, cone-beam computed tomography, peripheral quantitative computed tomography, spiral computed tomography and plain and contrast medium-enhanced digital radiography in studying root canal morphology. J Endod 36, 1547-1551.10.1016/j.joen.2010.05.008 ↗
23. 24. Almeida MM, Bernardineli N, Ordinola-Zapata R, Villas-Bôas MH, Amoroso-Silva PA, Brandão CG et al. (2013) Micro-computed tomography analysis of the root canal anatomy and prevalence of oval canals in mandibular incisors. J Endod 39, 1529-1533.10.1016/j.joen.2013.08.033 ↗
24. 25. Görduysus MO, Görduysus M, Friedman S (2001) Operating microscope improves negotiation of second mesiobuccal canals in maxillary molars. J Endod 27, 683-686.10.1097/00004770-200111000-00008 ↗
25. 26. Sert S, Aslanalp V, Tanalp J (2004) Investigation of the root canal configurations of mandibular permanent teeth in the Turkish population. Int Endod J 37, 494-499.10.1111/j.1365-2591.2004.00837.x ↗
26. 27. Silveira CF, Martos J, Neto JB, Ferrer-Luque CM, Silveira LF (2010) Clinical importance of the presence of lateral canals in endodontics. Gen Dent 58, e80-83.
27. 28. Riccuci D, Loghin S, Siqueira JF Jr (2013) Exuberant biofilm infection in a lateral canal as the cause of short-term endodontic treatment failure: report of a case. J Endod 39, 712-718.10.1016/j.joen.2012.12.008 ↗
28. 29. Zehnder M (2006) Root canal irrigants. J Endod 32, 389-398.10.1016/j.joen.2005.09.014 ↗