Gold Nanotubes with a Nanoporous Wall: Their Ultrathin Platinum Coating and Superior Electrocatalytic Activity toward Methanol Oxidation
Source abstract
Abstract
This paper describes a new strategy for synthesizing hollow nanotubes (pore d > 100 nm) with nanoporous walls (pore d < 10 nm) as well as how the nanoporous hollow nanotubes exhibit better intrinsic electrocatalytic activity toward methanol oxidation compared with an analogous nanotube system with smooth walls. Compared with vertical arrays of a nanorod system, the nanotube system is better in terms of increasing the effective surface area because the inner and outer surfaces are both in contact with the reaction medium. Au nanotubes with smooth wall and nanoporous walls were synthesized using AAO and conducting polymer nanorod templates. The surface of Au nanotube walls could be electrochemically coated with ultrathin Pt layers without changing the nanoporous structure. The resulting nanotubes showed different “intrinsic” electrocatalytic activities toward methanol oxidations depending on the wall structure (smooth or nanoporous). We compared its catalytic activity with the commercially available carbon-supported Pt nanoparticles and found that the catalytic activity of nanoporous nanotubes is the best among the investigated samples. The reason for this superior catalytic activity was attributed to the higher CO-poisoning tolerance and shorter effective length for electronic transportation.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion · Nanoporous metals and alloys · Anodic Oxide Films and Nanostructures
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Chemistry, BK21 School of Chemical Materials Science & SKKU Advanced Institute of Nanotechnology, Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon 440-746, South Korea
References (26)
Show source-provided references
1. Wieckowski A. · 1999
2. Lipkowski J. · 1998
3. Park S. · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2003 · 125 · 228210.1021/ja028154x ↗
4. Carrette L. · ChemPhysChem · 2000 · 1 · 16210.1002/1439-7641(20001215)1:4<162::AID-CPHC162>3.0.CO;2-Z ↗
5. Tong Y. Y. · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2002 · 124 · 46810.1021/ja011729q ↗
6. Horswell S. L. · J. Phys. Chem. B · 2001 · 105 · 94110.1021/jp002661o ↗
7. Park S. · J. Phys. Chem. B · 2001 · 105 · 971910.1021/jp011903x ↗
8. Mukerjee S. · J. Electroanal. Chem. · 1998 · 448 · 16310.1016/S0022-0728(97)00018-1 ↗
9. Ganesan R. · Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. · 2005 · 44 · 655710.1002/anie.200501272 ↗
10. Hull R. V. · Chem. Mater. · 2006 · 18 · 178010.1021/cm0518978 ↗
11. Hu Y.-S. · Nat. Mater. · 2006 · 5 · 71310.1038/nmat1709 ↗
12. Ding Y. · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2003 · 125 · 777210.1021/ja035318g ↗
13. Yoo S.-H. · Adv. Mater. · 2007 · 19 · 161210.1002/adma.200602551 ↗
14. Erlebacher J. · Nature · 2001 · 410 · 45010.1038/35068529 ↗
15. Park S. · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2002 · 124 · 242810.1021/ja017406b ↗
16. Yoo S.-H. · Electrochim. Acta · 2008 · 53 · 365610.1016/j.electacta.2007.12.028 ↗
17. Park S. · Langmuir · 2002 · 18 · 579210.1021/la0200459 ↗
18. Park S. · Science · 2004 · 303 · 34810.1126/science.1093276 ↗
19. Qin L. · Science · 2005 · 309 · 11310.1126/science.1112666 ↗
20. Martin C. R. · Science · 1994 · 266 · 196110.1126/science.266.5193.1961 ↗
21. Lahav M. · Nano Lett. · 2006 · 6 · 216610.1021/nl061786n ↗
22. Ji C. · J. Phys. Chem. B · 2003 · 107 · 449410.1021/jp0222200 ↗
23. Jia F. · Chem. Mater. · 2007 · 19 · 364810.1021/cm070425l ↗
24. Zhang J. · J. Phys. Chem. C · 2007 · 111 · 1038210.1021/jp072333p ↗
25. Yu C. · Chem. Mater. · 2007 · 19 · 606510.1021/cm701939v ↗
26. Huang J.-F. · Adv. Funct. Mater. · 2005 · 15 · 98910.1002/adfm.200400382 ↗