journal article·2019-04-01Open access

Design and Development of a Three-Dimensional Printing High-Throughput Melt Electrowriting Technology Platform

Felix M. Wunner, Sebastian Eggert, Joachim Maartens, Onur Bas, Paul D. Dalton, Elena M. De-Juan-Pardo, Dietmar W. Hutmacher

Abstract

Abstract Three-dimensionally (3D) printed scaffolds and cell culture lattices with microscale features are increasingly being used in tissue engineering and regenerative medicine. One additive manufacturing technology used to design and fabricate such structures is melt electrowriting (MEW), a process which needs to be scaled in production to effectively translate to industrial applications. In this study, a scale-up printer, designed with eight simultaneously extruding heads, is constructed and validated. Importantly, identical structures could be fabricated using parameters developed from a single-head system, therefore establishing a MEW printer ecosystem that allows for direct upscaling from laboratory research. The successful transfer to vertically mounted collectors produced homogeneous reproducible scaffolds with identical morphologies and fiber diameters. These proof-of-concept experiments also show that MEW is capable of large-scale fabrication, successfully demonstrated by manufacturing 780 × 780-mm sheets of scaffolds/lattices. This study demonstrates that upscaling MEW can be realized by multiplying the number of print heads, while vertical mounting of the collector significantly reduces the MEW footprint. Additionally, economic aspects were considered during the development and costly components, such as the x, y, and z linear axes, were minimized. Herein, a systems engineering approach for the development of a high-throughput MEW technology platform is presented for the first time.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials · Nanomaterials and Printing Technologies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Centre of Regenerative Medicine, Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, Kelvin Grove, Australia.

ARC Industrial Transformation Training Centre in Additive Biomanufacturing, Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, Kelvin Grove, Australia.

Department for Functional Materials in Medicine and Dentistry and the Bavarian Polymer Institute, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.

Institute for Advanced Study, Technical University of Munich, Garching, Germany.

References (45)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2011.11.00710.1016/j.progpolymsci.2011.11.007 ↗
2. 10.1038/nbt.341310.1038/nbt.3413 ↗
3. 10.1002/stem.250210.1002/stem.2502 ↗
4. 10.1055/s-0030-124831010.1055/s-0030-1248310 ↗
5. 10.1088/1758-5090/8/1/01410110.1088/1758-5090/8/1/014101 ↗
6. 10.1038/srep3484510.1038/srep34845 ↗
7. 10.1088/1758-5090/aa576610.1088/1758-5090/aa5766 ↗
8. 10.1007/s10439-016-1719-y10.1007/s10439-016-1719-y ↗
9. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2017.05.00910.1016/j.biomaterials.2017.05.009 ↗
10. 10.3390/ma911090910.3390/ma9110909 ↗
11. 10.5966/sctm.2014-025410.5966/sctm.2014-0254 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.actbio.2013.10.02410.1016/j.actbio.2013.10.024 ↗
13. Hutmacher DW Woodfield TBF Dalton PD. Scaffold design and fabrication. In: van Blitterswijk C De Boer J (Eds.) Tissue Engineering Elsevier Amsterdam The Netherlands 2014; pp. 311–346.10.1016/B978-0-12-420145-3.00010-9 ↗
14. 10.1089/3dp.2016.000610.1089/3dp.2016.0006 ↗
15. 10.1038/nmat86310.1038/nmat863 ↗
16. 10.1073/pnas.152134211310.1073/pnas.1521342113 ↗
17. 10.1038/nmat335710.1038/nmat3357 ↗
18. 10.1177/004051751142452410.1177/0040517511424524 ↗
19. 10.1002/anie.20060464610.1002/anie.200604646 ↗
20. 10.1016/S0266-3538(03)00178-710.1016/S0266-3538(03)00178-7 ↗
21. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.90.14450210.1103/PhysRevLett.90.144502 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.polymer.2007.08.00210.1016/j.polymer.2007.08.002 ↗
23. 10.1016/0304-3886(95)00041-810.1016/0304-3886(95)00041-8 ↗
24. 10.1002/pi.289310.1002/pi.2893 ↗
25. 10.1002/mame.20120029010.1002/mame.201200290 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2016.01.00110.1016/j.progpolymsci.2016.01.001 ↗
27. 10.1016/B978-0-12-803581-8.09318-810.1016/B978-0-12-803581-8.09318-8 ↗
28. 10.1088/1758-5090/7/3/03500210.1088/1758-5090/7/3/035002 ↗
29. 10.1021/acsami.7b0861710.1021/acsami.7b08617 ↗
30. 10.1038/nprot.2017.00210.1038/nprot.2017.002 ↗
31. 10.1002/app.4051510.1002/app.40515 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.cobme.2017.05.00710.1016/j.cobme.2017.05.007 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.cad.2015.04.00110.1016/j.cad.2015.04.001 ↗
34. 10.1021/acs.biomac.5b0131610.1021/acs.biomac.5b01316 ↗
35. 10.1002/adma.20130204210.1002/adma.201302042 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.elstat.2004.01.02110.1016/j.elstat.2004.01.021 ↗
37. 10.2298/JSC110711027L10.2298/JSC110711027L ↗
38. Hacker C, , Jungbecker P, , Silk G, et al. Electrospinning of polymer melt: Steps toward an upscaled multi-jet process. Proceedings of the International Conference on Latest Advances in High Tech Textiles and Textile-Based Materials, Het Pand, Ghent, Belgium, 2009; pp. 71–76.
39. 10.1002/app.3183710.1002/app.31837 ↗
40. Komarek M, , Martinova L. Design and evaluation of melt-electrospinning electrodes, Proceedings of 2nd NANOCON International Conference, Olomouc, Moravia, 2010; pp. 72–77.
41. 10.1002/adma.20120332110.1002/adma.201203321 ↗
42. 10.3791/5628910.3791/56289 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.matlet.2017.12.07910.1016/j.matlet.2017.12.079 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.jmsy.2016.03.00110.1016/j.jmsy.2016.03.001 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2015.07.03410.1016/j.eurpolymj.2015.07.034 ↗