Short-term effects of oral appliances with equal bite-raising distance but with varying protrusions on occlusal force, contact area and load center
Source abstract
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to demonstrate how short-term wearing of an oral appliance (OA) with equal bite-raising distance but with varying protrusions affects occlusal force, contact area and load center. Twelve young healthy volunteers participated. With the appliance, the mandible was protruded 0%, 45%, 60% and 75% of maximum protrusion capacity, with 10 mm bite-raising between the first molars. The occlusal force, contact area and load center at maximum voluntary clenching were measured before wearing the OA, at 1 h, 3 h and 6 h during wearing, and 1 h after removal. When compared to the values before wearing the OA, occlusal force was significantly lower at 1 h, 3 h and 6 h during wearing in the case of no mandibular protrusion, and at 3 h and 6 h after for 45%, 60% and 75% of maximum mandibular protrusion (P < 0.05). Occlusal contact area was significantly smaller at 1 h and 6 h during wearing in the case of no protrusion, and at 6 h during wearing in the case of 45% of maximum protrusion (P < 0.05). There was a tendency for anterior shift in the location of the occlusal load center at 3 h and 6 h during wearing of the OA with any level of maximum protrusion. No significant change in these three measurements was found at 1 h after removal of the OA. The present study demonstrated that wearing an OA had only a marginal and transient influence on oral functions when their changes were compared before and after wearing the OA.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Temporomandibular Joint Disorders · Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research · Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (19)
Show source-provided references
1. 1. Lindman R, Bondemark L (2001) A review of oral devices in the treatment of habitual snoring and obstructive sleep apnea. Swed Dent J 25, 39-51
2. 2. Liu Y, Zeng X, Fu M, Huang X, Lowe AA (2000) Effects of a mandibular repositioner on obstructive sleep apnea. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 118, 248-25610.1067/mod.2000.104831 ↗
3. 3. Tegelberg A, Wilhelmsson B, Walker-Engström ML, Ringqvist M, Andersson L, Krekmanov L, Ringqvist I (1999) Effects and adverse events of a dental appliance for treatment of obstructive sleep apnoea. Swed Dent J 23, 117-126
4. 4. Bondemark L (1999) Does 2 years' nocturnal treatment with a mandibular advancement splint in adult patients with snoring and OSAS cause a change in the posture of the mandible? Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 116, 621-62810.1016/S0889-5406(99)70196-4 ↗
5. 5. O'Sullivan RA, Hillman DR, Mateljan R, Pantin C, Finucane KE (1995) Mandibular advancement splint: an appliance to treat snoring and obstructive sleep apnea. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 151, 194-19810.1164/ajrccm.151.1.7812552 ↗
6. 6. Rose EC, Schnegelsberg C, Staats R, Jonas IE (2001) Occlusal side effects caused by a mandibular advancement appliance in patients with obstructive sleep apnea. Angle Orthod 71, 452-460
7. 7. Pantin CC, Hillman DR, Tennant M (1999) Dental side effects of an oral device to treat snoring and obstructive sleep apnea. Sleep 22, 237-24010.1093/sleep/22.2.237 ↗
8. 8. Rose E, Staats R, Virchow C, Jonas IE (2002) A comparative study of two mandibular advancement appliances for the treatment of obstructive sleep apnoea. Eur J Orthod 24, 191-19810.1093/ejo/24.2.191 ↗
9. 9. Ringqvist M, Walker-Engström M-L, Tegelberg Å, Ringqvist I (2003) Dental and skeletal changes after 4 years of obstructive sleep apnea treatment with a mandibular advancement device: a prospective, randomized study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 124, 53-6010.1016/S0889-5406(03)00240-3 ↗
10. 10. Marklund M, Franklin KA, Persson M (2001) Orthodontic side-effects of mandibular advancement devices during treatment of snoring and sleep apnoea. Eur J Orthod 23, 135-14410.1093/ejo/23.2.135 ↗
11. 11. Pitsis AJ, Darendeliler MA, Gotsopoulos H, Petocz P, Cistulli PA (2002) Effect of vertical dimension on efficacy of oral appliance therapy in obstructive sleep apnea. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 166, 860-86410.1164/rccm.200204-342OC ↗
12. 12. Walker-Engström ML, Ringqvist I, Vestling O, Wilhelmsson B, Tegelberg A (2003) A prospective randomized study comparing two different degrees of mandibular advancement with a dental appliance in treatment of severe obstructive sleep apnea. Sleep Breath 7, 119-13010.1007/s11325-003-0119-3 ↗
13. 13. Sinogaya T, Matsumoto M (1998) Evaluation of prosthodontic treatment by occlusal force distribution: a methodological study. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent 6, 121-125
14. 14. Taga H, Tomaru T, Naitoh S, Maehara S, Taga M, Maehara K, Serada K (2004) Effect of template therapy on sleep apnea syndrome. Showa Igakkai Zasshi 64, 114-119 (in Japanese)
15. 15. Hattori Y, Okugawa H, Watanabe M (1994) Occlusal force measurement using dental prescale. Nihon Hotetsu Shikagakkai Zasshi 38, 835-841 (in Japanese)10.2186/jjps.38.835 ↗
16. 16. Shiono H, Chiba SH, Watanabe S, Igarashi T, Nakajima K, Takeda T, Ishigami K, Ohki K (1995) Basic study on “Dental Prescale System” Part I. The range of fluctuation in occlusal contact area and the influence of applying bite-silicone material on “Dental Prescale”. Nihon Hotetsu Shikagakkai Zasshi 39, 710-716 (in Japanese)10.2186/jjps.39.710 ↗
17. 17. Ulrich J (1959) The human temporomandibular joint: kinematics and actions of the masticatory muscles. J Prosthet Dent 9, 399-40810.1016/0022-3913(59)90070-8 ↗
18. 18. Kawamura Y, Abe K (1974) Role of sensory information from temporomandibular joint. Bull Tokyo Med Dent Univ 21 Suppl, 78-82
19. 19. Bondemark L, Lindman R (2000) Craniomandibular status and function in patients with habitual snoring and obstructive sleep apnoea after nocturnal treatment with a mandibular advancement splint: a 2-year follow-up. Eur J Orthod 22, 53-6010.1093/ejo/22.1.53 ↗