journal article·2019-08-01

Fabrication of 3D Self-Assembled Porous Microbead-Type Poly( l -Lactide-co-ε-Caprolactone) Scaffolds for Tissue Engineering

Jin Ik Lim

Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract Biodegradable elastic poly( l -lactide-co- ɛ -caprolactone) (PLCL; 50:50) copolymer was synthesized, and 3D self-assembled porous microbead-type PLCL scaffolds were fabricated by a simple method involving rapid cooling of 1%, 5%, and 10% (w/v) PLCL/dioxane droplets into liquid nitrogen. The physicochemical properties of the PLCL scaffolds were examined by measuring their porosity, pore morphology, and interconnectivity using a scanning electron microscopy and dye-release testing. In addition, mechanical properties such as tensile strength and recovery for determining the elasticity of scaffolds were determined. NIH-3T3 fibroblast cell culture tests were performed to evaluate cell affinity for the scaffolds. The PLCL concentration had little effect on the initial cell adhesion after a 4-h cell culture; however, after a 48-h cell culture, increased cell proliferation on the collagen-coated PLCL scaffolds was observed. In this study, the porous bead scaffolds prepared from 5% (w/v) PLCL solutions showed a highly porous structure, satisfactory mechanical properties, and improved biocompatibility compared with those produced from 1% (w/v) or 10% (w/v) solutions. Such scaffolds show promise for a variety of tissue engineering applications.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Bone Tissue Engineering Materials · biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties · Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Chemical Engineering, College of Engineering, Dankook University, Yongin-si, Republic of Korea.

References (31)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.18063/IJB.2015.01.00710.18063/IJB.2015.01.007 ↗
2. 10.1039/C7BM01015J10.1039/C7BM01015J ↗
3. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2016.12.09210.1016/j.ijbiomac.2016.12.092 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.actbio.2008.09.01310.1016/j.actbio.2008.09.013 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.matdes.2018.04.03710.1016/j.matdes.2018.04.037 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.matlet.2017.02.05910.1016/j.matlet.2017.02.059 ↗
7. Scott S, , Namdev BS, , Kazunori H, et al. Bioactive polymeric scaffolds for tissue engineering. Bioact Mater, 2016; 1:93–108.
8. 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2017.01.00110.1016/j.biotechadv.2017.01.001 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.msec.2016.11.11610.1016/j.msec.2016.11.116 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.actbio.2016.10.03210.1016/j.actbio.2016.10.032 ↗
11. Ma PX Biomimetic materials for tissue engineering. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2008; 60:184–198.10.1016/j.addr.2007.08.041 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2007.05.01710.1016/j.progpolymsci.2007.05.017 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.actbio.2015.03.00410.1016/j.actbio.2015.03.004 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.actbio.2009.12.00710.1016/j.actbio.2009.12.007 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2013.10.02110.1016/j.eurpolymj.2013.10.021 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.actbio.2009.12.00810.1016/j.actbio.2009.12.008 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.02.00810.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.02.008 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2016.02.05010.1016/j.colsurfb.2016.02.050 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.11.01810.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.11.018 ↗
20. 10.15302/J-ENG-201506110.15302/J-ENG-2015061 ↗
21. 10.1088/1361-6528/aa536f10.1088/1361-6528/aa536f ↗
22. 10.3390/jfb901002210.3390/jfb9010022 ↗
23. 10.1002/adhm.20150016810.1002/adhm.201500168 ↗
24. 10.18063/IJB.2017.01.00710.18063/IJB.2017.01.007 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.carbon.2017.02.01310.1016/j.carbon.2017.02.013 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.actbio.2011.12.01210.1016/j.actbio.2011.12.012 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.actbio.2008.03.01510.1016/j.actbio.2008.03.015 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.bjoms.2005.10.00810.1016/j.bjoms.2005.10.008 ↗
29. 10.1067/maj.2000.10466410.1067/maj.2000.104664 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.01.05710.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.01.057 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2016.06.06810.1016/j.ceramint.2016.06.068 ↗