BIAXIAL FLEXURAL STRENGTH AND HARDNESS OF RESIN-MATRIX CERAMIC CAD/CAM MATERIALS
Source abstract
Abstract
This study evaluated the biaxial flexural strength (BFS) and hardness of four resin-matrix ceramic CAD/CAM materials namely, Vita Enamic (EN), Lava Ultimate (LU), Cerasmart (CS), Crystal Ultra (CU) and one glass-matrix ceramic material, Vitablocs Mark II (VM2). Disc-shaped specimens (12 mm in diameter and 1.2 mm in thickness) were prepared from the CAD/ CAM materials and were accordingly allocated into two groups. One group was used for baseline measurements and the other group was subjected to ageing by thermal-cycling (TC) for 10,000 cycles. The BFS and hardness was evaluated by a universal testing machine and a Vickers hardness tester, respectively. A two-way ANOVA, one-way ANOVA with Tukey's post hoc test, and Student's t-test (= 0.05) were used to analyse the data ( = 0.05). The highest and lowest BFS was seen in CS and VM2 and the difference in the BFS among the materials was statistically significant (p < 0.05). The comparison between the baseline and TC groups showed significant difference in the BFS for EN (p < 0.001), LU (p < 0.001), and CS (p < 0.012) but no difference was seen for VM2 (p = 0.238) and CU (p < 0.159). The Vickers hardness number (VHN) ranking of the materials for the baseline and TC specimens, was VM2 > EN > LU > CS > CU and VM2 > EN > LU > CU > CS, respectively. Following the TC, all the materials showed a significantly lower VHN (p < 0.05) except for VM2 (p = 0.727). The CS material had the highest BFS among the baseline and TC groups; however, it had the lowest hardness among the materials in the baseline group and had comparable values to CU after the TC. Ageing by thermal-cycling significantly lowered the BFS of the CAD/CAM materials except for VM2 and CU, and lowered the hardness of the resin-matrix ceramic materials.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Dental materials and restorations · Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Bone Tissue Engineering Materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (48)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.13168/cs.2020.002910.13168/cs.2020.0029 ↗
2. 10.11607/ijp.424410.11607/ijp.4244 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.04.01610.1016/j.prosdent.2015.04.016 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2013.05.00410.1016/j.jmbbm.2013.05.004 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.12.02110.1016/j.prosdent.2014.12.021 ↗
6. 10.1177/002203451455397610.1177/0022034514553976 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.jdent.2007.07.00210.1016/j.jdent.2007.07.002 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.10.01510.1016/j.prosdent.2014.10.015 ↗
9. 10.4012/dmj.2014-20810.4012/dmj.2014-208 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.09.01610.1016/j.prosdent.2018.09.016 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2014.04.02610.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2014.04.026 ↗
12. 10.1016/S0955-2219(01)00458-710.1016/S0955-2219(01)00458-7 ↗
13. 10.1002/jbm.b.3010310.1002/jbm.b.30103 ↗
14. 10.1016/s0300-5712(03)00110-610.1016/s0300-5712(03)00110-6 ↗
15. 10.1590/S1678-7757200300030000210.1590/S1678-77572003000300002 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.prosdent.2017.03.00110.1016/j.prosdent.2017.03.001 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.dental.2016.08.22210.1016/j.dental.2016.08.222 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.05.01110.1016/j.prosdent.2018.05.011 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2013.01.00310.1016/j.jmbbm.2013.01.003 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.05.00310.1016/j.prosdent.2018.05.003 ↗
21. 10.4317/jced.5252110.4317/jced.52521 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2013.09.01310.1016/j.jmbbm.2013.09.013 ↗
23. 10.1007/s00784-011-0576-110.1007/s00784-011-0576-1 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.dental.2007.06.02510.1016/j.dental.2007.06.025 ↗
25. 10.1186/s12903-017-0458-210.1186/s12903-017-0458-2 ↗
26. 10.1002/jbm.b.3318410.1002/jbm.b.33184 ↗
27. 10.1007/s10856-011-4350-310.1007/s10856-011-4350-3 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.07.01110.1016/j.prosdent.2015.07.011 ↗
29. 10.1111/jopr.1323910.1111/jopr.13239 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.prosdent.2017.06.01210.1016/j.prosdent.2017.06.012 ↗
31. 10.4012/dmj.23.49010.4012/dmj.23.490 ↗
32. 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1983.tb09964.x10.1111/j.1151-2916.1983.tb09964.x ↗
33. 10.1016/j.prosdent.2017.08.01610.1016/j.prosdent.2017.08.016 ↗
34. 10.1016/S0300-5712(98)00037-210.1016/S0300-5712(98)00037-2 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.jpor.2017.06.00110.1016/j.jpor.2017.06.001 ↗
36. 10.1002/1097-463610.1002/1097-4636 ↗
37. 10.1002/jbm.1046810.1002/jbm.10468 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.dental.2018.11.03210.1016/j.dental.2018.11.032 ↗
39. 10.1007/s10266-018-0407-910.1007/s10266-018-0407-9 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.dental.2016.03.01310.1016/j.dental.2016.03.013 ↗
41. 10.4103/0972-0707.7337910.4103/0972-0707.73379 ↗
42. 10.1155/2018/758905110.1155/2018/7589051 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.12.00110.1016/j.prosdent.2016.12.001 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.11.01410.1016/j.prosdent.2020.11.014 ↗
45. 10.4012/dmj.14.3710.4012/dmj.14.37 ↗
46. 10.1177/175873601452080910.1177/1758736014520809 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.jdent.2014.09.00810.1016/j.jdent.2014.09.008 ↗
48. 10.1016/j.jdent.2011.11.00610.1016/j.jdent.2011.11.006 ↗