Simulation-Trained Neural Networks for Automatable Crack Detection in Magnetic Field Images
Bibliographic record
Abstract
No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.
Source: Not provided · Quality: missing
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Non-Destructive Testing Techniques · Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation · Magnetic Properties and Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (22)
Show source-provided references
1. Lausch, D., Patzold, M., Rudolph, M., Lin, C.-M., Froebel, J., Kaufmann, K.: Magnetic field imaging (MFI) of solar modules. In: 35th European Photovoltaic Solar Energy Conference and Exhibition, pp. 1060, https://doi.org/10.4229/35thEUPVSEC20182018-5BO.11.5 (2018)10.4229/35thEUPVSEC20182018-5BO.11.5 ↗
2. Kaufmann, K., Lausch, D., Lin, C.-M., Rudolph, M., Hahn, D., Patzold, M.: Evaluation of the quality of solder joints within silicon solar modules using magnetic field imaging. Phys. Status Solidi A 218(6), 2000292 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1002/pssa.20200029210.1002/pssa.202000292 ↗
3. Weber, J., Hoffmann, S., Kaufmann, K., De Rose, A.L.: Magnetic field imaging (MFI) of shingle solar modules. In: 2022 IEEE 49th Photovoltaics Specialists Conference (PVSC), pp. 0231, https://doi.org/10.1109/PVSC48317.2022.9938644 (2022)10.1109/PVSC48317.2022.9938644 ↗
4. Brauchle, F., Grimsmann, F., von Kessel, O., Birke, K.P.: Defect detection in lithium ion cells by magnetic field imaging and current reconstruction. J. Power. Sources 558, 232587 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2022.23258710.1016/j.jpowsour.2022.232587 ↗
5. Bason, M.G., Coussens, T., Withers, M., Abel, C., Kendall, G., Krüger, P.: Non-invasive current density imaging of lithium-ion batteries. J. Power. Sources 533, 231312 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2022.23131210.1016/j.jpowsour.2022.231312 ↗
6. Lee, M., Shin, Y., Chang, H., Jin, D., Lee, H., Lim, M., Seo, J., Band, T., Kaufmann, K., Moon, J., Lee, Y. M., Lee, H.: Diagnosis of current flow patterns inside fault-simulated li-ion batteries via non-invasive. In: Operando magnetic field imaging. Small Methods, pp. 2300748, https://doi.org/10.1002/smtd.202300748 (2023)10.1002/smtd.202300748 ↗
7. Feng, B., Wu, J., Tu, H., Tang, J., Kang, Y.: A review of magnetic flux leakage nondestructive testing. Materials 15, 7362 (2022). https://doi.org/10.3390/ma1520736210.3390/ma15207362 ↗
8. Pelkner, M., Kreutzbruck, M.: Spin electronics for non destructive testing. In: Nanomagnetism: applications and perspectives, Wiley‐VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, 2017, pp. 81–102 https://doi.org/10.1002/9783527698509.ch5.10.1002/9783527698509.ch5 ↗
9. Liu, L., Ouyang, W., Wang, X., Fieguth, P., Chen, J., Liu, X., Pietikäinen, M.: Deep learning for generic object detection: a survey. Int. J. Comput. Vision 128, 261 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11263-019-01247-410.1007/s11263-019-01247-4 ↗
10. Buehler, K., Kaufmann, K., Patzold, M., Sprenger, M., Schoenfelder, S.: Identifying defects on solar cells using magnetic field measurements and artificial intelligence trained by a finite-element-model. EPJ Photovoltaics 14, 12 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1051/epjpv/202300510.1051/epjpv/2023005 ↗
11. Ortner, M., Bandeira, L.G.C.: “Magpylib: a free Python package for magnetic field computation. SoftwareX 11, 100466 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.softx.2020.10046610.1016/j.softx.2020.100466 ↗
12. Tian, Z., Shen, C., He, T.: FCOS: fully convolutional one-stage object detection. arXiv (2019). https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1904.0135510.48550/arXiv.1904.01355 ↗
13. Ren, S., He, K., Girshick, R., Sun, J.: Faster R-CNN: towards real-time object detection with region proposal networks. arXiv (2016). https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1506.0149710.48550/arXiv.1506.01497 ↗
14. Dosovitskiy, A., Beyer, L., Kolesnikov, A., Weissenborn, D., Zhai, X., Unterthiner, T., Dehghani, M., Minderer, M., Heigold, G., Gelly, S., Uszkoreit, J., Houlsby, N.: An image is worth 16x16 words: transformers for image recognition at scale. arXiv (2020). https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2010.1192910.48550/arXiv.2010.11929 ↗
15. Carion, N., Massa, F., Synnaeve, G., Usunier, N., Kirillov, A., Zagoruyko, S.: End-to-end object detection with transformers. arXiv (2020). https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2005.1287210.48550/arXiv.2005.12872 ↗
16. Jocher, G., Chaurasia, A., Stoken, A., Borovec, J., Kwon, Y., Michael, K., Xie, T., Fang, J., Lorna, I., Yifu, Z., Wong, C., Montes, A.V.D., Wang, Z., Fati, C., Nadar, J.: Laughing, ultralytics/yolov5: v7.0 - YOLOv5 SOTA Realtime Instance Segmentation (v7.0), Zenodo, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7347926 (2022)10.5281/zenodo.7347926 ↗
17. Wu, Y., Kirillov, A., Massa, F., Lo, W.-Y., Girshick, R.: Detectron2, https://github.com/facebookresearch/detectron2 (2019)
18. Zaidi, S.S.A., Ansari, M.S., Aslam, A., Kanwal, N., Asghar, M., Lee, B.: A survey of modern deep learning based object detection models. Digital Signal Process. 126, 103514 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsp.2022.10351410.1016/j.dsp.2022.103514 ↗
19. Pelkner, M., Neubauer, A., Reimund, V., Kreutzbruck, M., Schütze, A.: Routes for GMR-sensor design in non-destructive testing. Sensors 12(9), 12169 (2012). https://doi.org/10.3390/s12091216910.3390/s120912169 ↗
20. Li, E., Kang, Y., Tang, J., Wu, J., Yan, X.: Analysis on spatial spectrum of magnetic flux leakage using fourier transform. IEEE Trans. Magn. 54(8), 6201810 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1109/TMAG.2018.284422010.1109/TMAG.2018.2844220 ↗
21. Pelkner, M., Pohl, R., Kreutzbruck, M., Commandeur, C.: Development of adapted GMR-probes for automated detection of hidden defects in thin steel sheets. AIP Conf. Proc. 1706(1), 020018 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.494046410.1063/1.4940464 ↗
22. Malago, P., Slanovc, F., Herzog, S., Lumetti, S., Schaden, T., Pellegrinetti, A., Moridi, M., Abert, C., Suess, D., Ortner, M.: Magnetic position system design method applied to three-axis joystick motion tracking. Sensors 20(23), 6873 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3390/s2023687310.3390/s20236873 ↗