journal article·2025-09

A Physics-informed Wave Tomography Framework for Defect Reconstruction: A Collaborative Network Scheme

Hairui Liu, Qi Li, Zhi Qian, Peng Li, Zhenghua Qian, Dianzi Liu

Publisher page

Abstract

It is challenging for guided wave tomography methods to intelligently solve problems in the area of structural defect detection, as this requires more data to achieve the high-accuracy reconstruction of defects. To meet this end, a physics-informed wave tomography framework (PIWT) with a collaborative network scheme is proposed in this paper to reconstruct defects in metal plates with high levels of accuracy and efficiency. First, taking the spatial coordinate information of the point source and sampling points as the inputs of the deep learning collaborative network, a physical principle-based prediction framework is established by minimizing the loss functions to realize the mapping of inputs to outputs, which are represented as the travel time and wave velocity in two collaborative networks for defect reconstruction. To effectively guide the convergence direction of the collaborative network for efficient computations, the Helmholtz equation and source condition are leveraged as the constraints on PIWT to realize the defect reconstruction. As the developed approach belongs to the class of mesh-free methods, its superiority over the conventional mesh-based ultrasonic Lamb wave tomography imaging (ULWTI) technique is demonstrated for defect reconstruction throughout the numerical and experimental examples in terms of accuracy. Moreover, the effects of pre-training on the accelerated convergence and accuracy of the PIWT framework are discussed to allow the training with few epochs and also help effectively achieve real-time high-precision defect reconstruction in the fields of non-destructive testing and structural health monitoring, thus offering a promising solution for broader engineering applications.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Seismic Waves and Analysis · Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation · Seismic Imaging and Inversion Techniques

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (39)

Show source-provided references
1. Huthwaite, P., Simonetti, F.: High-resolution guided wave tomography. Wave Motion. 50, 979–993 (2013)10.1016/j.wavemoti.2013.04.004 ↗
2. Brath, A.J., Simonetti, F., Nagy, P.B., et al.: Acoustic formulation of elastic guided wave propagation and scattering in curved tubular structures. IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Control. 61, 815–829 (2014)10.1109/TUFFC.2014.2973 ↗
3. Lu, Y., Michaels, J.E.: A methodology for structural health monitoring with diffuse ultrasonic waves in the presence of temperature variations. Ultrasonics. 43, 717–731 (2005)10.1016/j.ultras.2005.05.001 ↗
4. Pei, J., Yousuf, M.I., Degertekin, F.L., et al.: Lamb wave tomography and its application in pipe erosion/corrosion monitoring. J. Res. Nondestructive Evaluation. 8, 189–197 (1996)10.1080/09349849609409599 ↗
5. Croxford, A.J., Wilcox, P.D., Drinkwater, B.W., et al.: Strategies for guided-wave structural health monitoring. Proc. Royal Soc. A: Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 463, 2961–2981 (2007)10.1098/rspa.2007.0048 ↗
6. Ostachowicz, W., Kudela, P., Malinowski, P., et al.: Damage localisation in plate-like structures based on PZT sensors. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 23, 1805–1829 (2009)10.1016/j.ymssp.2008.10.011 ↗
7. Hua, J., Cao, X., Yi, Y., et al.: Time-frequency damage index of broadband lamb wave for corrosion inspection. J. Sound Vib. 464, 114985 (2020)10.1016/j.jsv.2019.114985 ↗
8. Dubuc, B., Ebrahimkhanlou, A., Livadiotis, S., et al.: Inversion algorithm for Lamb-wave-based depth characterization of acoustic emission sources in plate-like structures. Ultrasonics. 99, 105975 (2019)10.1016/j.ultras.2019.105975 ↗
9. Huang, S., Wei, Z., Zhao, W., et al.: A new omni-directional EMAT for ultrasonic lamb wave tomography imaging of metallic plate defects. Sensors. 14, 3458–3476 (2014)10.3390/s140203458 ↗
10. Zhao, X., Royer, R.L., Owens, S.E., et al.: Ultrasonic lamb wave tomography in structural health monitoring. Smart Mater. Struct. 20, 105002 (2011)10.1088/0964-1726/20/10/105002 ↗
11. Livadiotis, S., Ebrahimkhanlou, A., Salamone, S.: A helical-based ultrasonic imaging algorithm for structural health monitoring of cylindrical structures. Health Monit. Struct. Biol. Syst. XIII SPIE. 10972, 8–14 (2019)
12. Andersen, A.H., Kak, A.C.: Simultaneous algebraic reconstruction technique (SART): A superior implementation of the ART algorithm. Ultrason. Imaging. 6, 81–94 (1984)10.1177/016173468400600107 ↗
13. Jansen, D.P., Hutchins, D.A., Ungar, P.J., et al.: Acoustic tomography in solids using a bent ray SIRT algorithm[J]. Nondestructive Test. Evaluation. 6(3), 131–148 (1991)10.1080/10589759108953135 ↗
14. Würfl, T., Ghesu, F.C., Christlein, V., et al.: Deep learning computed tomography. Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention-MICCAI 2016: 19th International Conference, Athens, Greece, October 17–21, 2016, Proceedings, Part III 19. Springer International Publishing: 432–440. (2016)10.1007/978-3-319-46726-9_50 ↗
15. Araya-Polo, M., Jennings, J., Adler, A., et al.: Deep-learning tomography. Lead. Edge. 37, 58–66 (2018)10.1190/tle37010058.1 ↗
16. Wang, G., Ye, J.C., De Man, B.: Deep learning for tomographic image reconstruction. Nat. Mach. Intell. 2, 737–748 (2020)10.1038/s42256-020-00273-z ↗
17. Raissi, M., Perdikaris, P., Karniadakis, G.E.: Physics-informed neural networks: A deep learning framework for solving forward and inverse problems involving nonlinear partial differential equations. J. Comput. Phys. 378, 686–707 (2019)10.1016/j.jcp.2018.10.045 ↗
18. Raissi, M.: Forward–backward stochastic neural networks: deep learning of high-dimensional partial differential equations. In: Carr P (ed) Peter Carr Gedenkschrift: Research Advances in Mathematical Finance. arXiv preprint arXiv, pp 637–655 (2024)10.1142/9789811280306_0018 ↗
19. Wight, C.L., Zhao, J.: Solving allen-cahn and cahn-hilliard equations using the adaptive physics informed neural networks. (2020). arXiv preprint arXiv:2007.04542.
20. Wang, S., Yu, X., Perdikaris, P.: When and why pinns fail to train: A neural tangent kernel perspective. arXiv preprint arXiv:2007.14527, 2020. (2020)
21. Molnar, J.P., Grauer, S.J.: Flow field tomography with uncertainty quantification using a bayesian physics-informed neural network. Meas. Sci. Technol. 33(6), 065305 (2022)10.1088/1361-6501/ac5437 ↗
22. Cai, S., Mao, Z., Wang, Z., et al.: Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) for fluid mechanics: A review. Acta. Mech. Sin. 37, 1727–1738 (2021)10.1007/s10409-021-01148-1 ↗
23. Mao, Z., Jagtap, A.D., Karniadakis, G.E.: Physics-informed neural networks for high-speed flows. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 360, 112789 (2020)10.1016/j.cma.2019.112789 ↗
24. Cai, S., Wang, Z., Wang, S., et al.: Physics-informed neural networks for heat transfer problems. J. Heat Transfer 143. (2021)10.1115/1.4050542 ↗
25. Zhang, E., Dao, M., Karniadakis, G.E., et al.: Analyses of internal structures and defects in materials using physics-informed neural networks. Sci. Adv. 8, eabk0644 (2022)10.1126/sciadv.abk0644 ↗
26. bin Waheed, U., Haghighat, E., Alkhalifah, T., et al.: PINNeik: Eikonal solution using physics-informed neural networks. Comput. Geosci. 155, 104833 (2021)10.1016/j.cageo.2021.104833 ↗
27. Smith, J.D., Azizzadenesheli, K., Ross, Z.E.: Eikonet: Solving the Eikonal equation with deep neural networks. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 59, 10685–10696 (2020)10.1109/TGRS.2020.3039165 ↗
28. Rose, L.R.F., Wang, C.H.: Mindlin plate theory for damage detection: Source solutions[J]. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 116(1), 154–171 (2004)10.1121/1.1739482 ↗
29. Huthwaite, P., Simonetti, F.: High-resolution guided wave tomography[J]. Wave Motion. 50(5), 979–993 (2013)10.1016/j.wavemoti.2013.04.004 ↗
30. Huang, X., Greenhalgh, S.: A finite-difference iterative solver of the Helmholtz equation for frequency-domain seismic wave modeling and full-waveform inversioniterative Helmholtz solver. Geophysics. 86(2), T107–T116 (2021)10.1190/geo2020-0411.1 ↗
31. Fang, J., Qian, J., Zepeda-Núñez, L., et al.: Learning dominant wave directions for plane wave methods for high-frequency Helmholtz equations. Res. Math. Sci. 4, 9 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40687-017-0098-910.1186/s40687-017-0098-9 ↗
32. Cui, H., Li, B., Zhou, L.B., et al.: Damage detection in Thick plate structures based on ultrasonic SH wave. Smart Mater. Struct. 31, 095018 (2022)10.1088/1361-665X/ac8030 ↗
33. Chen, X., Hu, H.L., Gao, C.X., et al.: Comparison of algebraic reconstruction technique and simultaneous iterative reconstruction technique in electrical capacitance tomography image reconstruction. J. Xi’an Jiaotong Univ. 45, 25–29 (2011)
34. Abadi, M., Barham, P., Chen, J., et al.: Tensorflow: A system for large-scale machine learning. Osdi. 16, 265–283 (2016)
35. Kingma D. P.: Adam: A method for stochastic optimization. arXiv preprint arXiv:1412.6980 (2014)
36. The Scikit-FMM Team: Scikit-FMM, a CPU toolkit to formulate the travel time. Accessed 8 Jul (2021). https://pythonhosted.org/scikit-fmm/
37. Chen, X., Yang, R., Xue, Y., et al.: Deep transfer learning for bearing fault diagnosis: A systematic review since 2016[J]. IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas. 72, 1–21 (2023)
38. Williamson, P.R.: A guide to the limits of resolution imposed by scattering in ray tomography[J]. Geophysics. 56(2), 202–207 (1991)10.1190/1.1443032 ↗
39. Oh, K.S., Jung, K.: GPU implementation of neural networks. Pattern Recogn. 37, 1311–1314 (2004)10.1016/j.patcog.2004.01.013 ↗