Direct Fused Deposition Modeling 4D Printing and Programming of Thermoresponsive Shape Memory Polymers with Autonomous 2D‐to‐3D Shape Transformations
Source abstract
Abstract
Herein, direct 4D printing of thermoresponsive shape memory polymers (SMPs) by the fused deposition modeling (FDM) method that enables programing of 2D objects during printing for autonomous 2D‐to‐3D shape transformations via simply heating is focused on. The programming process during printing is investigated through designs and experiments. The capability of programming SMPs during printing is illustrated by prestrain and bending capabilities, which are highly related to printing settings, such as nozzle temperature, print speed, layer height, infill patterns, and ratio of active parts in a bilayer structure. A nearly linear relationship for prestrain and bending parameters is experimentally revealed for different printing factors. Quantitative results are presented to be used as a guidance for designing complex 3D structures via 4D printing of 2D structures. Helix structure, twisting structure, DNA‐like structures, and functional gripper are designed to demonstrate the potential of direct FDM 4D printing for creating complex 3D structures from simple 2D structures with advantages over traditional manufacturing methods. It is shown that, by removing the need for a layer‐by‐layer stacking process to achieve a complex 3D shape, FDM can promote sustainability via 4D printing of autonomous 2D‐to‐3D shape transformer structures with lower materials, time, energy, and longer service life.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Materials and Mechanics · Polymer composites and self-healing · Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Guangzhou Institute of Technology Xidian University Guangzhou 510555 China
Department of Engineering School of Science and Technology Nottingham Trent University Nottingham NG11 8NS UK
References (40)
Show source-provided references
1. Gibson I. · 2014
2. Chua C. K. · 2016
3. 10.1016/j.cad.2015.04.00110.1016/j.cad.2015.04.001 ↗
4. 10.1016/S0007-8506(07)63240-510.1016/S0007-8506(07)63240-5 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.08.08810.1016/j.compstruct.2017.08.088 ↗
6. 10.1016/S0007-8506(07)62438-X10.1016/S0007-8506(07)62438-X ↗
7. S.Tibbits inTED Conference New York NY United States2013.
8. Wikipedia Smart Material https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Smart_material(accessed: April 2020).
9. 10.1002/adem.20220065010.1002/adem.202200650 ↗
10. 10.1038/nmat454410.1038/nmat4544 ↗
11. 10.1021/acsami.6b0738810.1021/acsami.6b07388 ↗
12. 10.1088/2399-7532/aac32210.1088/2399-7532/aac322 ↗
13. 10.1063/1.481983710.1063/1.4819837 ↗
14. 10.1088/0964-1726/23/9/09400710.1088/0964-1726/23/9/094007 ↗
15. 10.1038/srep2422410.1038/srep24224 ↗
16. 10.1038/srep1361610.1038/srep13616 ↗
17. 10.1088/0964-1726/25/10/10503410.1088/0964-1726/25/10/105034 ↗
18. 10.1088/1361-665X/aa95ec10.1088/1361-665X/aa95ec ↗
19. 10.1088/1361-665X/aabc2a10.1088/1361-665X/aabc2a ↗
20. 10.1016/j.matdes.2017.08.06910.1016/j.matdes.2017.08.069 ↗
21. 10.1038/srep2243110.1038/srep22431 ↗
22. 10.1038/srep0893610.1038/srep08936 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.mattod.2017.08.02610.1016/j.mattod.2017.08.026 ↗
24. 10.1039/C7MH00269F10.1039/C7MH00269F ↗
25. G.Wang H.Yang Z.Yan N.Gecer Ulu Y.Tao J.Gu L. B.Kara L.Yao inProc. of the 31st Annual ACM Symp. on User Interface Software and Technology Association for Computing Machinery New York NY United States2018 pp.623–635.10.1145/3242587.3242625 ↗
26. G.Wang Y.Tao O. B.Capunaman H.Yang L.Yao inProc. of the 2019 CHI Conf. on Human Factors in Computing Systems Association for Computing Machinery New York NY United States2019 pp.1–12.10.1145/3290605.3300656 ↗
27. J.Gu D. E.Breen J.Hu L.Zhu Y.Tao T.Van de Zande G.Wang Y. J.Zhang L.Yao inProc. of the 2019 CHI Conf. on Human Factors in Computing Systems2019 pp.1–10.10.1145/3290605.3300267 ↗
28. B.An Y.Tao J.Gu T.Cheng X. A.Chen X.Zhang W.Zhao Y.Do S.Takahashi H.-Y.Wu inProc. of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems2018 pp.1–12.10.1145/3173574.3173834 ↗
29. 10.1002/adem.20200029610.1002/adem.202000296 ↗
30. 10.1038/srep3111010.1038/srep31110 ↗
31. 10.1002/adem.20220184210.1002/adem.202201842 ↗
32. 10.1002/adem.20220067710.1002/adem.202200677 ↗
33. 10.1002/admt.20190033210.1002/admt.201900332 ↗
34. 10.1002/anie.20131104710.1002/anie.201311047 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.eml.2022.10177910.1016/j.eml.2022.101779 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.mechmat.2020.10362810.1016/j.mechmat.2020.103628 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.jmps.2007.12.00210.1016/j.jmps.2007.12.002 ↗
38. 10.1016/S1369-7021(07)70047-010.1016/S1369-7021(07)70047-0 ↗
39. 10.3390/mi1306083610.3390/mi13060836 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2020.10600710.1016/j.ijfatigue.2020.106007 ↗