journal article·2022-04-03

Evaluation of the Use of Cellulose, Latex and Metakaolin in the Production of Cement Composites with Low Water Absorption and High Modulus of Elasticity

Lara Cristina Péres Dos Santos, Rondinele Alberto Dos Reis Ferreira, Leila Aparecida De Castro Motta, Daniel Pasquini, Andrielli Morais De Oliveira

Journal of Natural Fibers· Volume 19· Issue 4
Publisher page

Abstract

In this work, the aim was to study the influence of cellulose Kraft pulps, natural rubber latex, and metakaolin in the optimization of the values of flexural strength and water absorption of cementitious composites through the design of experiments (central composite design) at 28 days of age. According to the design of experiments, the composite with 1.252% cellulose, 1.126% latex and 37.06% metakaolin presented the optimized value of the modulus of elasticity (21.89 GPa). In addition, an increase in the values of modulus of elasticity for composites with lower cellulose contents was observed. Latex and metakaolin provided small variations in the modulus of elasticity. For water absorption, only cellulose exhibited significant interference. Thus, lower values of water absorption were found for lower concentrations of cellulose. The optimized composite that showed less water absorption was with 1.5% cellulose, 0.02% latex, and 4% metakaolin, with 10.28% absorption. In view of the results obtained, it was concluded that the use of central composite design, the molding method adopted, and the limits of constituents used allowed the optimization the values studied responses (modulus of elasticity, and absorption).
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites · Advanced Cellulose Research Studies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Civil Engineering School, Federal University of Uberlândia, Uberlândia, Brazil

Chemistry Institute, Federal University of Uberlândia, Uberlândia, Brazil

Civil Engineering School, Federal University of Goiás, Goiânia, Brazil

References (32)

Show source-provided references
1. American Society for Testing and Materials –ASTM C 948-81. (2009). Standard test method for dry and wet bulk density, water absorption, and apparent porosity of thin sections of glass-fiber reinforced concrete. 10.1520/C0948-81R16.
2. American Society for Testing Materials – ASTM D 1076-02. (2014). Standard specification for rubber – concentrated, ammonia preserved, creamed, and centrifuged natural latex. 10.1520/D1076-14.
3. American Society for Testing Materials – ASTM E871-82. (2019). Standard test method for moisture analysis of particulate wood fuels. 10.1520/E0871-82R19.
4. 10.1590/S1415-4366200300020002610.1590/S1415-43662003000200026 ↗
5. Asprone D. · Construction and Building Materials · 2011 · 25 · 286710.1016/j.conbuildmat.2010.12.046 ↗
6. Associação Brasileira de Normas Técnicas - NBR 16697. (2018). Cimento Portland de alta resistência inicial. Rio de Janeiro. https://www.abntcatalogo.com.br/norma.aspx?ID=400221.
7. Associação Brasileira de Normas Técnicas – NBR 9778:2005, Versão Corrigida 2 (2009). Argamassa e concreto endurecidos - Determinação da absorção de água, índice de vazios e massa específica. https://www.abntcatalogo.com.br/norma.aspx?ID=52163.
8. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.02.00710.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.02.007 ↗
9. Bentur A. · 2007
10. Bijen J. · Cement and Concrete Composites · 1990 · 12 · 9510.1016/0958-9465(90)90046-Z ↗
11. Cao Y. · Construction and Building Materials,119 · 2016 · 119 · 7110.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.03.077 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2017.12.01610.1016/j.compositesb.2017.12.016 ↗
13. Fidelis M. E. A. · Cement and Concrete Research · 2019 · 116 · 25210.1016/j.cemconres.2018.12.002 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.03.23610.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.03.236 ↗
15. Hoppe Filho J. · Matéria · 2017 · 22 · 1
16. Joseph J. · International Journal of Engineering Science and Computing · 2017 · 7 · 10772
17. Khamput P. · Energy Procedia · 2011 · 9 · 55910.1016/j.egypro.2011.09.065 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2006.06.01910.1016/j.compositesa.2006.06.019 ↗
19. Mármol G. · Waste Biomass Valorization · 2019 · 1
20. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.11.04410.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.11.044 ↗
21. Motta L. A. C. · Matéria · 2016 · 21 · 796
22. 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2016.02.01410.1016/j.cemconcomp.2016.02.014 ↗
23. 10.1590/S0104-1428201200500000210.1590/S0104-14282012005000002 ↗
24. Rabello, M. (2003). Estudo da influência do MetacaulimHP como adição de alta eficiência em concretos de cimento Portland. Escola Politécnica da Universidade de São Paulo. http://www.metacaulim.com.br/pdf/metacaulim-hp-usp.pdf.
25. Rilem. Technical Committee 49 TRF · Matériaux et Constructions · 1989 · 17 · 441
26. Romano R. C. O. · Cerâmica · 2016 · 62 · 21510.1590/0366-69132016623632039 ↗
27. Santos L. C. P. · International Journal of Advanced Engineering Research and Science · 2019 · 6 · 2349
28. 10.1016/j.susmat.2017.04.00310.1016/j.susmat.2017.04.003 ↗
29. 10.22161/ijaers.6.4.410.22161/ijaers.6.4.4 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2009.09.01610.1016/j.compositesa.2009.09.016 ↗
31. 10.1177/073168440936057810.1177/0731684409360578 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2017.01.01410.1016/j.cemconcomp.2017.01.014 ↗