Some Properties of Composite Panels Manufactured from Eastern Redcedar (Juniperus virginianaL.) Using Modified Starch as a Green Binder
Source abstract
Abstract
The objective of this study was to evaluate basic properties of particleboard panels manufactured from Eastern redcedar (Juniperus virginiana L.) using modified starch and low percent of urea formaldehyde as binder. Experimental panels in the form of three-layer configuration were made from the raw material at two density levels. Bending characteristics, namely, modulus of elasticity (MOE), modulus of rupture (MOR), and internal bond strength (IB) in addition to dimensional stability and surface roughness of the samples were determined. The highest MOE and MOR values of the samples with 0.80 g/cm3 density level were found as 2344.32 and 12.14 MPa, respectively. Both bending and IB values of the samples were comparable to those of commercially manufactured panels from other species. It appears that dimensional stability of the panels needs to be enhanced. Based on the findings in this work, modified starch could have potential as green binder in particleboard panels manufactured from Eastern redcedar without having substantial adverse influence on their properties.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites · Nanocomposite Films for Food Packaging · Wood Treatment and Properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (32)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2013.02.02010.1016/j.compositesb.2013.02.020 ↗
2. 10.1007/s11676-011-0188-210.1007/s11676-011-0188-2 ↗
3. 10.1520/D1037-1210.1520/D1037-12 ↗
4. 10.1177/875608790933649310.1177/8756087909336493 ↗
5. Bidwell, T. G., D. M. Engle, M. E. Moselay, and R. E. Masters. 2000.Invasion of Oklahoma rangeland and forests by Eastern red cedar and Ashe juniper. Stillwater: Circular E-947, Oklahoma Cooperative Extension Service, Division of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources, Oklahoma State University.
6. Composite Panel Association (CPA) · 1999
7. Composite Panel Association (CPA) · 2016
8. 10.13073/FPJ-D-12-00087.110.13073/FPJ-D-12-00087.1 ↗
9. 10.13073/FPJ-D-13-0008210.13073/FPJ-D-13-00082 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.buildenv.2004.05.01610.1016/j.buildenv.2004.05.016 ↗
11. Hiziroglu S. · Forest Product Journal · 2002 · 52
12. 10.1016/j.buildenv.2004.02.00410.1016/j.buildenv.2004.02.004 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.07.16010.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.07.160 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2003.11.00410.1016/j.ijadhadh.2003.11.004 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.aasri.2012.11.01610.1016/j.aasri.2012.11.016 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.aasri.2012.11.01510.1016/j.aasri.2012.11.015 ↗
17. McKinley C. R. · 2012
18. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2012.07.04110.1016/j.compositesb.2012.07.041 ↗
19. 10.1007/s00226-012-0525-410.1007/s00226-012-0525-4 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.matdes.2006.01.01510.1016/j.matdes.2006.01.015 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.buildenv.2005.03.01610.1016/j.buildenv.2005.03.016 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.yrtph.2007.02.00110.1016/j.yrtph.2007.02.001 ↗
23. Pizzi A. · 199410.1201/9781482293548 ↗
24. Price K. · 2010
25. 10.1016/j.biortech.2013.02.05610.1016/j.biortech.2013.02.056 ↗
26. 10.5552/drind10.5552/drind ↗
27. 10.1016/j.measurement.2014.04.00110.1016/j.measurement.2014.04.001 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2011.04.00510.1016/j.ijadhadh.2011.04.005 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.envint.2009.06.00210.1016/j.envint.2009.06.002 ↗
30. US Census Bureau. 1999. Reconstituted wood products manufacturing. Economic census manufacturing. Industry series report EC 97M-3212E, US Government Printing Office, Washington, USA.
31. 10.1016/j.biortech.2007.03.04710.1016/j.biortech.2007.03.047 ↗
32. 10.1007/s00226005011910.1007/s002260050119 ↗