Simulation, Fabrication and Mechanical Characterization of a Jute–Epoxy Biocomposite Hubcap for Automotive Applications
Source abstract
Abstract
This study presents the design, numerical simulation, fabrication, and mechanical characterization of an automotive hubcap manufactured from a jute fabric-reinforced epoxy biocomposite. The hubcap geometry was designed in SolidWorks and analyzed using finite element simulations under static, centrifugal (2546 rpm), and thermal (130 °C) loading conditions representative of service environments. The component was fabricated by compression molding using a two-part silicone mold derived from a 3D-printed master. Mechanical testing of jute–epoxy laminates revealed a tensile strength of 25.97 MPa, a tensile modulus of 2.47 GPa, a flexural strength of 69.41 MPa, and a flexural modulus of 1.08 GPa. Finite element results showed low deformation (maximum 0.058 mm under static load and 0.031 mm under centrifugal load) and Von Mises stresses below 9.5 MPa, corresponding to safety factors above 2.7. Under thermal loading, the maximum stress reached 52.3 MPa with a displacement of 0.138 mm, identifying temperature as the most critical condition. The fabricated hubcap exhibited a low mass of 239 g, representing an estimated weight reduction of 30–40% compared to conventional plastic alternatives. These results confirm the feasibility of jute-based biocomposites for lightweight, non-structural automotive applications with improved environmental performance.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites · Mechanical Engineering and Vibrations Research · Cellular and Composite Structures
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
University of Msila
Faculty of Technology
United Arab Emirates University (UAEU)
King Saud University
Kyambogo University
Southeast University
References (68)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.matdes.2014.11.05910.1016/j.matdes.2014.11.059 ↗
2. 10.1177/0731684421107060910.1177/07316844211070609 ↗
3. 10.1080/15440478.2019.164579110.1080/15440478.2019.1645791 ↗
4. Awrejcewicz, J., and V. A. Krysko. 2020. Elastic and Thermoelastic Problems in Nonlinear Dynamics of Structural Members. Springer.10.1007/978-3-030-37663-5 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.matdes.2012.11.02510.1016/j.matdes.2012.11.025 ↗
6. 10.1080/15440478.2022.205489510.1080/15440478.2022.2054895 ↗
7. 10.1007/s00170-020-06217-610.1007/s00170-020-06217-6 ↗
8. 10.1007/s11668-020-00831-y10.1007/s11668-020-00831-y ↗
9. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2025.11888410.1016/j.compstruct.2025.118884 ↗
10. 10.1080/15440478.2026.265308610.1080/15440478.2026.2653086 ↗
11. 10.3390/ma1421663110.3390/ma14216631 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.jmrt.2024.08.10410.1016/j.jmrt.2024.08.104 ↗
13. 10.1007/s00161-015-0442-510.1007/s00161-015-0442-5 ↗
14. 10.3390/ma1219313510.3390/ma12193135 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2012.04.00310.1016/j.progpolymsci.2012.04.003 ↗
16. Fisher, G. 2023. “Natural Fibers: The New Fashion in Automotive Composites.” International Fiber Journal| Fibers, Filaments & Processing Solutions, International Fiber Journal.
17. 10.1007/s10570-026-06981-w10.1007/s10570-026-06981-w ↗
18. 10.1007/s12008-023-01684-z10.1007/s12008-023-01684-z ↗
19. 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e2434510.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e24345 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e4092410.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e40924 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.proeng.2013.03.19610.1016/j.proeng.2013.03.196 ↗
22. 10.1007/s12008-024-01968-y10.1007/s12008-024-01968-y ↗
23. 10.1177/0731684421105870810.1177/07316844211058708 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2003.09.01610.1016/j.compositesa.2003.09.016 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2025.14737410.1016/j.ijbiomac.2025.147374 ↗
26. 10.1007/s13399-024-06140-w10.1007/s13399-024-06140-w ↗
27. 10.1002/pc.2627810.1002/pc.26278 ↗
28. Klippel, B. B. P. 1998. A Design Methodology for Automotive Component Manufacturing Systems. Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
29. 10.1007/s11668-022-01447-010.1007/s11668-022-01447-0 ↗
30. Kurien, R. A., and M. Maria Anil. 2023. “Natural Fiber Composites as Sustainable Resources for Emerging Applications - A Review.” In Materials Today: Proceedings, Kochi, India.
31. 10.1007/s13399-024-05984-610.1007/s13399-024-05984-6 ↗
32. Kurien, R. A., and A. Biju. 2022. “Chicken Feather Fiber Reinforced Composites for Sustainable Applications.” In Materials Today: Proceedings, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, Ramapuram Campus, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India, 58, 862–866.
33. 10.3390/jcs907031610.3390/jcs9070316 ↗
34. 10.1016/B978-0-443-32796-4.00003-610.1016/B978-0-443-32796-4.00003-6 ↗
35. 10.1007/s10965-024-04208-910.1007/s10965-024-04208-9 ↗
36. 10.1088/1757-899X/872/1/01206410.1088/1757-899X/872/1/012064 ↗
37. 10.1007/s10570-023-05441-z10.1007/s10570-023-05441-z ↗
38. Kurien, R. A., and M. Thomas. 2026. “Surface-Modified Natural Fiber Composites.” In Natural Fiber Composites for a Sustainable Environment, edited by J. T. Philip, J. Jose, and S. C. George, 237–249. Boca Raton, FL.Note: CRC Press.10.1201/9781032665337-13 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.jmrt.2023.04.15910.1016/j.jmrt.2023.04.159 ↗
40. 10.1002/pc.2791110.1002/pc.27911 ↗
41. 10.1007/s00289-022-04241-y10.1007/s00289-022-04241-y ↗
42. 10.1177/073168440934167210.1177/0731684409341672 ↗
43. Mostefa Meddah, S. A., M. Rokbi, A. Belaadi, N. Bouaziz, S. Achour, M. S. A. Mahmood, H. A. Al-Lohedan, A. Al-Khawlani, and H. Mukalazi. 2026. “Comparative Analysis of Polyester Composites Reinforced with Local Plant Fibers: Stipa Tenacissima vs. Agave Americana.” Journal of Natural Fibers 23 (1): 1–30.
44. 10.1007/s10570-023-05377-410.1007/s10570-023-05377-4 ↗
45. 10.1007/s10924-021-02147-w10.1007/s10924-021-02147-w ↗
46. 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e2468310.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e24683 ↗
47. 10.1080/20426445.2021.194518010.1080/20426445.2021.1945180 ↗
48. Naik, V., and M. Kumar. 2021. “A Review on Natural Fiber Composite Material in Automotive Applications.” Engineered Science 18 (18): 1–10.
49. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2015.08.03810.1016/j.compositesa.2015.08.038 ↗
50. 10.1007/s42452-025-06981-810.1007/s42452-025-06981-8 ↗
51. 10.1088/2631-8695/addb2c10.1088/2631-8695/addb2c ↗
52. 10.2478/ama-2023-002210.2478/ama-2023-0022 ↗
53. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.12.07510.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.12.075 ↗
54. 10.1002/pc.2942810.1002/pc.29428 ↗
55. 10.1016/j.istruc.2025.10820410.1016/j.istruc.2025.108204 ↗
56. 10.1002/pc.2965710.1002/pc.29657 ↗
57. 10.1007/s12221-025-00902-710.1007/s12221-025-00902-7 ↗
58. 10.1080/15376494.2024.238827510.1080/15376494.2024.2388275 ↗
59. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2022.11610510.1016/j.compstruct.2022.116105 ↗
60. Saravanakumar, Y. N., and N. K. Chandran. 2026. “Chapter 1 - Recent Developments in Natural Fibre-Reinforced Polymer Biocomposites for Future Sustainability and Key Challenges: A Review.” In Damage Analysis of Natural Fiber-Reinforced Polymer Biocomposites, edited by M. T. HAMEED. Sultan, A. E. K. Qaiss, R. Bouhfid, M. H. MAT. Yazik, and F. SYAZWANI. Shahar, 3–20. Elsevier: Woodhead Publishing.10.1016/B978-0-443-28858-6.00005-3 ↗
61. 10.1177/1350650121101673010.1177/13506501211016730 ↗
62. 10.3221/IGF-ESIS.70.0110.3221/IGF-ESIS.70.01 ↗
63. 10.1007/s12034-011-0149-610.1007/s12034-011-0149-6 ↗
64. 10.1177/0892705724125432410.1177/08927057241254324 ↗
65. 10.1080/15440478.2025.246149310.1080/15440478.2025.2461493 ↗
66. 10.1177/1558925024131146810.1177/15589250241311468 ↗
67. 10.1002/pc.2951810.1002/pc.29518 ↗
68. 10.1016/j.aej.2024.12.00210.1016/j.aej.2024.12.002 ↗