journal article·2023-04-24Open access

A Comparative Study on Moisture Management Properties of Natural and Manmade Cellulosic Fabrics Produced from Plain and Its Derivative Knitted Structures

S. Suganthi, K.M. Pachiayappan, S. Priyalatha, C. Prakash

Journal of Natural Fibers· Volume 20· Issue 1

Abstract

The ability to transport and evaporate moisture quickly and effectively is a very essential and expected property of a fabric chosen for the clothing purposes. The present study analyzed the moisture management properties of four different natural and manmade cellulosic fibers, its blends and by varying three different knitted structures using moisture management tester. The result reveals that the modal fiber wicks and spreads quickly and it requires an average 50% lesser time than other fiber samples. Among the three structures, single jersey fabrics showed excellent behavior of transportation of moisture through its surface. Single jersey modal fabric was rated as superior moisture management fabric, which can be recommended for the applications such as sportswear, where high moisture management properties with greater comfort are demanded.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Textile materials and evaluations · Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites · Material Properties and Processing

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Costume Design and Fashion, PSG College of Arts and Science, Coimbatore, India

Department of Fashion Technology, Sona College of Technology, Salem, Tamil Nadu, India

Department of Handloom and Textile Technology, Indian Institute of Handloom Technology, Ministry of Textiles, Govt. of India, Nadia, India

References (18)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.3390/ma1314316710.3390/ma13143167 ↗
2. Bivainyte, A., and D. Mikučioniene. 2011. Investigation on the dynamic water absorption of double-layered weft knitted fabrics. Fibres & Textiles in Eastern Europe 6 (89):64–10.
3. 10.1515/aut-2011-11040210.1515/aut-2011-110402 ↗
4. 10.1515/aut-2007-07020410.1515/aut-2007-070204 ↗
5. 10.1007/s12221-008-0036-y10.1007/s12221-008-0036-y ↗
6. 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2006.07.00810.1016/j.polymertesting.2006.07.008 ↗
7. 10.1177/004051750707802310.1177/0040517507078023 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.rineng.2021.10026310.1016/j.rineng.2021.100263 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.rineng.2021.10023210.1016/j.rineng.2021.100232 ↗
10. 10.1007/s12289-021-01624-w10.1007/s12289-021-01624-w ↗
11. 10.3390/coatings1103029310.3390/coatings11030293 ↗
12. 10.1007/s42452-020-2403-210.1007/s42452-020-2403-2 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.ijthermalsci.2006.12.00210.1016/j.ijthermalsci.2006.12.002 ↗
14. Özdil, N., G. Süpüren, G. Özçelik, and J. Pruchova. 2009. A study on the moisture transport properties of the cotton knitted fabrics in single jersey structure. Textile and Apparel 19 (3):218–23.
15. 10.1177/004051751038361110.1177/0040517510383611 ↗
16. 10.1080/00405000.2016.122023210.1080/00405000.2016.1220232 ↗
17. 10.1177/152808370910292210.1177/1528083709102922 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2006.03.01410.1016/j.polymertesting.2006.03.014 ↗