journal article·2019-01-02

Hibiscus sabdariffa(Roselle): A potential source of bast fiber

Binita Baishya Kalita, Seiko Jose, Sunita Baruah, Sanghamitra Kalita, Smita Rani Saikia

Journal of Natural Fibers· Volume 16· Issue 1
Publisher page

Abstract

Roselle is a bast fiber, and its utilization as a textile fiber for the development of textile products is still scanty. A work has been attempted to develop yarn from Roselle. Fibers were extracted from Roselle bark by decortication and degummed in alkaline medium. The degumming process was optimized based on fiber yield and strength. The degummed fibers were then bleached by the hydrogen peroxide bleaching process. Degummed and bleached fibers were characterized by scanning electron microscope, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, and X-ray diffraction analysis. Degumming and bleaching results in enhancement of density, fineness, and brightness of Roselle fiber. A marginal decrease in tenacity of the Roselle fiber was observed after bleaching; however, the strength was not affected by degumming. Fibers were converted into fine yarn in the jute spinning system. The yarn properties inferred that the yarn possessed essential properties for the preparation of apparels and home furnishing.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced Cellulose Research Studies · Dyeing and Modifying Textile Fibers · Hibiscus Plant Research Studies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Textiles and Apparel Designing, Assam Agricultural University, Jorhat, Assam, India

Mechanical Processing Division, ICAR-National Institute of Research on Jute & Allied Fibre Technology, Kolkata, India

Department of of Fashion Designing and Technology, Assam Women University, Jorhat, Assam, India

Department of Home Science, Digboi mahila mahavidyalaya, Digboi, Assam, India

References (19)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.indcrop.2015.08.01210.1016/j.indcrop.2015.08.012 ↗
2. 10.1007/s10570-006-9061-410.1007/s10570-006-9061-4 ↗
3. Dempsey J. M. · 1975
4. 10.1016/j.indcrop.2015.08.06410.1016/j.indcrop.2015.08.064 ↗
5. 10.1080/0040500830863176910.1080/00405008308631769 ↗
6. Goswami T. · Journal of Scientific and Industrial Research · 2003 · 62 · 802
7. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.09.09210.1016/j.jclepro.2016.09.092 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.indcrop.2017.03.01510.1016/j.indcrop.2017.03.015 ↗
9. 10.1080/15440478.2015.109344110.1080/15440478.2015.1093441 ↗
10. 10.1080/15440478.2015.102919410.1080/15440478.2015.1029194 ↗
11. 10.1016/0960-8524(95)00067-O10.1016/0960-8524(95)00067-O ↗
12. 10.1186/1754-6834-3-1010.1186/1754-6834-3-10 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2010.01.05910.1016/j.carbpol.2010.01.059 ↗
14. Sharma Y. K. · Indian Forester · 1983 · 109 · 401
15. Shi J. · BioResources · 2012 · 7 · 346310.15376/biores.7.3.3463-3475 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2012.09.01510.1016/j.carbpol.2012.09.015 ↗
17. 10.1021/jf034633j10.1021/jf034633j ↗
18. Thacker M. S. · 1997
19. 10.1080/0040500080247256410.1080/00405000802472564 ↗