journal article·2022-11-23

Extraction and Characterization of Antimicrobial surgical Suture from the bast of Tinospora Cordifolia

Shohag Chandra Das, Mohammad Abbas Uddin

Journal of Natural Fibers· Volume 19· Issue 15
Publisher page

Abstract

Tinospora cordifolia, a climbing plant of south-east Asia, has been used as an Ayurveda for thousands years for its extraordinary medicinal properties. Two of its special properties are antimicrobial and anti-infection property. The objective of the study is to produce surgical suture from the bast of Tinospora cordifolia and evaluate the related chemical, physical and mechanical properties of that suture. In this work, the antimicrobial activity analysis by agar disc diffusion method, tensile strength analysis with digital single thread strength tester for both straight pull and knot pull, creep test, thread count by Beesley’s Balance, moisture analysis by Reynold & Branson rapid regain tester and surface roughness analysis by Homel roughness tester have been conducted. The Agar disc diffusion method indicates the thread contains antimicrobial properties, tensile strength is perfect for being used as a surgical suture with 38% reducing in knot pull than straight pull, fineness is also in the range where moisture content and regain is more than most of the natural fibers with higher roughness, lacking, suggesting a perfect natural surgical suture for Tex-medical applications.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Phytochemicals and Medicinal Plants · Food Science and Nutritional Studies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Bachelor of Science, Department of Wet Processing Engineering, Bangladesh University of Textiles, Dhaka, Bangladesh

Head, Department of Dyes and Chemical Engineering, Bangladesh University of Textiles, Dhaka, Bangladesh

References (20)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1177/004051750809409010.1177/0040517508094090 ↗
2. 10.15406/jbmoa.2017.05.0014710.15406/jbmoa.2017.05.00147 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.bioorg.2018.12.03410.1016/j.bioorg.2018.12.034 ↗
4. 10.1088/0957-4484/25/13/13510110.1088/0957-4484/25/13/135101 ↗
5. Das P. K. · Indian Journal of Traditional Knowledge · 2010 · 9 · 386
6. 10.15520/ijcrr/2018/9/08/56410.15520/ijcrr/2018/9/08/564 ↗
7. 10.1002/jbm.a.3057010.1002/jbm.a.30570 ↗
8. 10.17485/ijst/v14i9.226810.17485/ijst/v14i9.2268 ↗
9. Kannojiya R. · Journal of Environmental Research and Development J · 2013 · 7 · 1385
10. 10.1016/S0378-8741(97)00086-X10.1016/S0378-8741(97)00086-X ↗
11. 10.1007/s10856-007-3114-610.1007/s10856-007-3114-6 ↗
12. 10.1002/jbm.82023011010.1002/jbm.820230110 ↗
13. 10.1054/bjps.1999.324710.1054/bjps.1999.3247 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.jss.2006.06.00110.1016/j.jss.2006.06.001 ↗
15. 10.1039/C5TC02043C10.1039/C5TC02043C ↗
16. 10.1163/092050611X58151610.1163/092050611X581516 ↗
17. 10.1007/978-3-642-75802-7_1710.1007/978-3-642-75802-7_17 ↗
18. 10.1002/mabi.20100029810.1002/mabi.201000298 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e0243710.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e02437 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.jep.2012.03.02710.1016/j.jep.2012.03.027 ↗