journal article·2026-07-05

Geometry‐Faithful Strain Normalization for Interface‐Controlled Strengthening in Phase‐Transforming Filamentary Composites

Obinna Onyebuchi Barah, Abdulrazak Jinadu Otaru, Ige Bori, Sami F. Khalil

Publisher page

Abstract

In deformation‐processed composites, strength is governed by refinement of a codeforming second phase into a dense filamentary architecture that constrains plasticity through interfacial barriers. When a postdeformation phase transformation alters reinforcement volume and filament geometry at fixed macroscopic dimensions, nominal true strain no longer uniquely represents the operative interfacial length scale. Here, a geometry‐faithful framework is introduced to restore a one‐to‐one mapping between deformation state and reinforcement length scale through an effective‐strain normalization that accounts for transformation‐induced filament expansion. The approach is demonstrated using a filamentary Al/Ca composite and its postdeformation converted Al/Al 2 Ca state, combining tensile testing, quantitative filament‐thickness measurements, and barrier‐type scaling. Normalization aids direct comparison at matched filament thickness ( t ≈ 1.10–0.35 µm), enabling assessment of the geometry‐normalized apparent interfacial barrier effect separately from chemistry‐driven geometry changes. On a geometry‐consistent basis, strength in both states follows an inverse‐thickness dependence (∝1/ t ), consistent with interface‐controlled dislocation glide, while the transformed state exhibits higher strengthening efficiency at high refinement, reaching ultimate tensile strength (UTS) = 365 MPa at t ≈ 0.35 µm ( η eff ≈ 12.7) with only a modest conductivity penalty (31.5 MS m −1 , ≈10% relative to Al). Effective‐strain normalization thus decouples deformation history from transformation‐induced geometry evolution and provides a transferable basis for ranking reinforcement efficiency in postdeformation phase‐transforming composites. The normalization is applicable when the reinforcement retains a continuous filamentary topology and transformation‐induced expansion is approximately uniform; it becomes less reliable when filament breakup, spheroidization, or reaction gradients make filament thickness no longer representative of the operative barrier spacing.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Aluminum Alloys Composites Properties · Advanced ceramic materials synthesis · Aluminum Alloy Microstructure Properties

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Mechanical Engineering School of Engineering and Applied Sciences Kampala International University Kampala Uganda

Chemical Engineering Department College of Engineering King Faisal University Al Ahsa Saudi Arabia

Department of Mechanical Engineering Kabale University Kabale Uganda

Biomedical Engineering Department College of Engineering King Faisal University Al Ahsa Saudi Arabia

References (61)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1177/1464420722109053410.1177/14644207221090534 ↗
2. 10.1007/S12289‐022‐01697‐110.1007/S12289‐022‐01697‐1 ↗
3. 10.3390/MA1801012510.3390/MA18010125 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e1670010.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e16700 ↗
5. 10.1007/S10853‐023‐09300‐X10.1007/S10853‐023‐09300‐X ↗
6. 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2022.10094810.1016/j.pmatsci.2022.100948 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.msea.2021.14154210.1016/j.msea.2021.141542 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2022.10103410.1016/j.pmatsci.2022.101034 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.jmapro.2020.09.01010.1016/j.jmapro.2020.09.010 ↗
10. 10.1002/ADEM.20240139210.1002/ADEM.202401392 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.ijplas.2023.10378110.1016/j.ijplas.2023.103781 ↗
12. 10.1016/J.JNUCMAT.2021.15338010.1016/J.JNUCMAT.2021.153380 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.jmst.2023.01.05210.1016/j.jmst.2023.01.052 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2022.16391510.1016/j.jallcom.2022.163915 ↗
15. 10.1177/1464420725137998310.1177/14644207251379983 ↗
16. 10.1007/S43939‐025‐00226‐610.1007/S43939‐025‐00226‐6 ↗
17. 10.1088/2053‐1591/AD346810.1088/2053‐1591/AD3468 ↗
18. 10.1016/J.EPSR.2013.07.01710.1016/J.EPSR.2013.07.017 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.msea.2020.14010810.1016/j.msea.2020.140108 ↗
20. 10.1007/S10338‐025‐00591‐Y10.1007/S10338‐025‐00591‐Y ↗
21. 10.1007/S12540‐018‐00211‐010.1007/S12540‐018‐00211‐0 ↗
22. 10.1016/S1003‐6326(24)66478‐210.1016/S1003‐6326(24)66478‐2 ↗
23. 10.1115/1.405559310.1115/1.4055593 ↗
24. 10.1088/1757‐899X/219/1/01201410.1088/1757‐899X/219/1/012014 ↗
25. 10.1007/S10853‐024‐09890‐010.1007/S10853‐024‐09890‐0 ↗
26. 10.1002/MAWE.7001710.1002/MAWE.70017 ↗
27. 10.1134/s0031918x1906009710.1134/s0031918x19060097 ↗
28. 10.1134/S0031918X2008002510.1134/S0031918X20080025 ↗
29. 10.1016/J.MSEA.2017.03.01010.1016/J.MSEA.2017.03.010 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.msea.2024.14776610.1016/j.msea.2024.147766 ↗
31. 10.1016/J.JALLCOM.2022.16537910.1016/J.JALLCOM.2022.165379 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2024.17466710.1016/j.jallcom.2024.174667 ↗
33. 10.1007/S10853‐019‐04160‐W10.1007/S10853‐019‐04160‐W ↗
34. 10.1016/J.ACTAMAT.2021.11756010.1016/J.ACTAMAT.2021.117560 ↗
35. 10.1002/ADEM.20190074810.1002/ADEM.201900748 ↗
37. 10.1007/S11661‐011‐1029‐910.1007/S11661‐011‐1029‐9 ↗
38. 10.1016/J.FINMEC.2022.10009010.1016/J.FINMEC.2022.100090 ↗
39. 10.3390/MA1623748810.3390/MA16237488 ↗
40. 10.1016/J.IJADHADH.2023.10334510.1016/J.IJADHADH.2023.103345 ↗
41. 10.3390/MA1416458810.3390/MA14164588 ↗
42. 10.1002/ADMA.20210736210.1002/ADMA.202107362 ↗
43. 10.1007/S10853‐022‐07010‐410.1007/S10853‐022‐07010‐4 ↗
44. 10.1007/S00107‐019‐01402‐110.1007/S00107‐019‐01402‐1 ↗
45. 10.1021/ACSAELM.0C0031110.1021/ACSAELM.0C00311 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.bpj.2019.06.01810.1016/j.bpj.2019.06.018 ↗
47. 10.1007/S11029‐020‐09894‐210.1007/S11029‐020‐09894‐2 ↗
48. 10.1115/1.405199310.1115/1.4051993 ↗
49. 10.3390/MET1304069010.3390/MET13040690 ↗
50. 10.1016/J.CORSCI.2020.10886810.1016/J.CORSCI.2020.108868 ↗
51. 10.1016/J.MTLA.2024.10215810.1016/J.MTLA.2024.102158 ↗
52. 10.1007/978‐3‐319‐72284‐9_3410.1007/978‐3‐319‐72284‐9_34 ↗
53. 10.3390/JCS507017210.3390/JCS5070172 ↗
54. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2021.10813810.1016/j.engfracmech.2021.108138 ↗
55. A.Allamki M.Al‐Maharbi R.Arunachalam andS. Z.Qamar “Improved Tensile Strength and Electrical Conductivity of the Electrical Conductor Aluminum Alloy 6201 ” inProceedings of the ASME 2021 International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition 3(ASME 2021) Advanced Materials: Design Processing Characterization and Applications https://doi.org/10.1115/IMECE2021‐70245.10.1115/IMECE2021-70245 ↗
56. 10.1007/S12598‐020‐01695‐910.1007/S12598‐020‐01695‐9 ↗
57. 10.1016/J.SCRIPTAMAT.2024.11646210.1016/J.SCRIPTAMAT.2024.116462 ↗
58. 10.1016/J.MSEA.2024.14692410.1016/J.MSEA.2024.146924 ↗
59. 10.37745/ejms.2014/vol9n1254310.37745/ejms.2014/vol9n12543 ↗
60. 10.1093/IJLCT/CTZ02810.1093/IJLCT/CTZ028 ↗
61. 10.1088/2053‐1591/ADC90110.1088/2053‐1591/ADC901 ↗