journal article·2023-07Open access

Adapting Shot Peening for Surface Texturing Using Customized Additive Manufactured Shots

Asghar Heydari Astaraee, Sara Bagherifard, Emilio Alfredo Rajme López, Mario Guagliano

Advanced Engineering Materials· Volume 25· Issue 14

Abstract

Surface textures in engineering materials not only affect the reflective properties and aesthetics but if properly designed can modulate surface‐related properties such as wettability, fatigue, wear, corrosion, and scratch resistance. Herein, a new surface texturing method is introduced based on the conventional shot peening process. Custom shots are designed, and their surface texturing capability is investigated on acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS) polymer substrates. A finite‐element model is developed to bombard the substrate using AISI 316 stainless steel customized shots. The generated unique textures are compared qualitatively by visual examination and quantitatively using the standard surface roughness parameters. As a proof of concept, preliminary experiments are performed using a candidate custom shot and a spherical shot to treat the ABS sheets. The results highlight the high potential of the shot peening technique paired with additive manufacturing for customizing the peening media to be used for surface texturing polymeric materials.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Surface Treatment and Residual Stress · Erosion and Abrasive Machining · Laser Material Processing Techniques

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Mechanical Engineering Politecnico di Milano 20156 Milan Italy

References (29)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1179/026708408X33408710.1179/026708408X334087 ↗
2. 10.3390/ma1414384110.3390/ma14143841 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2022.10735410.1016/j.ijfatigue.2022.107354 ↗
4. 10.3390/met1301006910.3390/met13010069 ↗
5. 10.1016/S0924-0136(00)00893-110.1016/S0924-0136(00)00893-1 ↗
6. 10.1088/1757-899X/518/3/03201710.1088/1757-899X/518/3/032017 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.promfg.2019.06.16910.1016/j.promfg.2019.06.169 ↗
8. C.Kanger H.Hadidi S.Akula C.Sandman J.Quint M.Alsunni R.Underwood C.Slafter J.Sonderup M.Spilinek J.Casias P.Rao M. P.Sealy presented at28th Annual Inter. Solid Freeform Fabrication Symp. - An Additive Manufacturing Conf. SFF 2017 Austin USA2020.
9. 10.1016/B978-0-12-816137-1.00037-410.1016/B978-0-12-816137-1.00037-4 ↗
10. 10.1007/s00170-022-08731-110.1007/s00170-022-08731-1 ↗
11. 10.1007/s10853-016-0423-510.1007/s10853-016-0423-5 ↗
12. 10.3390/polym1106098110.3390/polym11060981 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2020.12672910.1016/j.surfcoat.2020.126729 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2020.12678210.1016/j.surfcoat.2020.126782 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.vacuum.2011.11.00410.1016/j.vacuum.2011.11.004 ↗
16. 10.3389/fphy.2018.0001610.3389/fphy.2018.00016 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.matpr.2019.12.06710.1016/j.matpr.2019.12.067 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.nanoms.2020.04.00210.1016/j.nanoms.2020.04.002 ↗
19. G.Johnson W. H.Cook inThe 7th Int. Symp. Ballistics Hague Netherlands1983.
20. 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2008.09.00710.1016/j.ijimpeng.2008.09.007 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2016.04.01210.1016/j.jmatprotec.2016.04.012 ↗
22. Yin F. · Int. J. Comput. Mater. Sci. Surf. Eng. · 2015 · 6 · 97
23. 10.1038/s41524-019-0171-610.1038/s41524-019-0171-6 ↗
24. Kirk D. · Shot Peener(USA) · 1995 · 9 · 28
25. 10.1016/j.matdes.2016.12.04510.1016/j.matdes.2016.12.045 ↗
26. ISO25178-22021.
27. 10.3390/ma1413347610.3390/ma14133476 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.addma.2020.10161910.1016/j.addma.2020.101619 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.advengsoft.2014.05.01010.1016/j.advengsoft.2014.05.010 ↗