Influence of ZrO2 Nanoparticles Including SDS and CTAB Surfactants Assembly on the Interfacial Properties of Liquid-Liquid, Liquid-Air and Liquid-Solid Surface Layers
Source abstract
Abstract
This work investigates the effects of nanometric (5-8 nm) ZrO2 nanoparticles on adsorption of two surfactants, SDS (sodium dodecyl sulfate) and C12TAB (dodecyl trimethyl ammonium bromide) into oil/water, air/water and solid/water interfaces. Increasing the concentration of nanoparticles reduces the interfacial tension and surface tension of SDS at low surfactant concentration (< cmc) but it has a minor effect on interfacial and surface tension of C12TAB. Repulsive columbic interactions between SDS molecules and nanoparticles can cause the higher adsorption of surfactant at the oil/water interface. Adsorption of both surfactants on carbonate rock increases by adding nanoparticles to the system. This possibly happened because of the formation of surfactant-nanoparticle negatively charged aggregates that tend to adsorb on positively charged surface layer of carbonate rock. ZrO2 nanoparticles are surface active at the oil/water interface too, as the results of interfacial tension indicate they can decrease the n-heptane/water IFT about 14 units.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Pickering emulsions and particle stabilization · Enhanced Oil Recovery Techniques · Surfactants and Colloidal Systems
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Iran University of Science and Technology (IUST)
University of Tehran
NIOC-R&D
References (9)
Show source-provided references
1. Ravera F, Ferrari M, Liggieri L, Loglio G, Santini E, Zanobini A. Liquid–liquid interfacial properties of mixed nanoparticle-surfactant systems. Colloids Surf A 2008; 323: 99–108.10.1016/j.colsurfa.2007.10.017 ↗
2. Levine, S.; Bowen, B. D.; Partridge, S. J., Stabilization of emulsions by fine particles I. Partitioning of particles between continuous phase and oil/water interface. Colloids and Surfaces 1989, 38, (2), 325-343.10.1016/0166-6622(89)80271-9 ↗
3. Menon, V. B.; Nikolov, A. D.; Wasan, D. T., Interfacial effects in solids-stabilized emulsions: Measurements of film tension and particle interaction energy. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science 1988, 124, (1), 317-327.10.1016/0021-9797(88)90353-0 ↗
4. Binks, B. P., Particles as surfactants: similarities and differences. Current Opinion in Colloid & Interface Science 2002, 7, (1-2), 21-41.10.1016/s1359-0294(02)00008-0 ↗
5. Ma, H.; Luo, M.; Dai, L. L., Influences of surfactant and nanoparticle assembly on effective interfacial tensions. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics 2008, 10, (16), 2207-2213.10.1039/b718427c ↗
6. Ravera, F.; Santini, E.; Loglio, G.; Ferrari, M.; Liggieri, L., Effect of Nanoparticles on the Interfacial Properties of Liquid/Liquid and Liquid/Air Surface Layers. The Journal of Physical Chemistry B 2006, 110, (39), 19543-19551.10.1021/jp0636468 ↗
7. Thammachart, M.; Meeyoo, V.; Risksomboon, T.; Osuwan, S., Catalytic activity of CeO2-ZrO2 mixed oxide catalysts prepared via sol-gel technique: CO oxidation. Catalysis Today 2001, 68, (1-3), 53-61.10.1016/s0920-5861(01)00322-4 ↗
8. Pouriya Esmaeilzadeh, Alireza Bahramian, Zahra Fakhroueian, Adsorption of Anionic, Cationic and Nonionic Surfactants on Carbonate Rock in Presence of ZrO2 Nanoparticles, Physics Procedia 22 (2011) 63 – 67.10.1016/j.phpro.2011.11.009 ↗
9. Susana Z., Jhosgre R. and A. L. López de Ramos: Interfacial Tension of Alkane + Water Systems, J. Chem. Eng. Data, 2001, 46 (5), 1086–1088.10.1021/je000245r ↗