journal article·2010-05

Self-Diffusion in Magnetron-Sputtered Nanocrystalline Fe Films

S. Chakravarty, U. Tietze, D. Lott, M. Horisberger, Jochen Stahn, N.P. Lalla, Harald Schmidt

Publisher page

Abstract

Self-diffusion in magnetron sputtered nanocrystalline Fe films was investigated by neutron reflectometry on [natFe(10 nm)/57Fe(5 nm)]20 isotope multilayers between 310 and 510°C. The determined diffusivities corresponding to diffusion length between 0.8 – 2.1 nm are time dependent and decrease by more than two orders of magnitude during isothermal annealing. This behaviour can be attributed due to the annihilation of frozen-in point defects, formed during sputtering. For very long annealing times of more than 8 days the diffusivities above 400°C are in good accordance with the volume diffusivities on single crystals given in the literature. However, at temperatures below 400°C the diffusivities are higher than extrapolated literature data, indicating that defect annihilation is still an ongoing process. Furthermore, a comparison of diffusivities obtained for nanocrystalline Fe films prepared by magnetron sputtering and ion beam sputtering, respectively, is presented and discussed.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Microstructure and mechanical properties · nanoparticles nucleation surface interactions · Magnetic properties of thin films

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Clausthal University of Technology

GKSS Research Center Geesthacht

ETH Zürich & Paul Scherrer Institute

UGC-DAE Consortium for Scientific Research

Technische Universität Clausthal

References (15)

Show source-provided references
1. K.S. Kumar, H. Van Swygenhoven, S. Suresh: Acta Mater. Vol. 51 (2003), p.5743.10.1016/j.actamat.2003.08.032 ↗
2. W. Brückner, V. Weihnacht: J. Appl. Phy. Vol. 85 (1999), p.3602.10.1063/1.369721 ↗
3. J. Weissmüller, J. Markmann: Adv. Eng. Mater. Vol. 7 (2005), p.203.10.1002/adem.200400211 ↗
4. H. Natter, M. Schmelzer, M.S. Löffler, C. E. Krill, et al.: J. Phys. Chem. B Vol. 104 (2000), p.2467.10.1021/jp991622d ↗
5. R. Würschum, S. Herth, U. Brossmann: Adv. Eng. Mater. Vol. 5 (2003), p.365.10.1002/adem.200310079 ↗
6. S.V. Divinski, F. Hisker, C. Herzig, R. Filipek, M. Danielewski: Def. Diff. Forum Vols. 237240 (2005), p.50.10.4028/www.scientific.net/DDF.237-240.50 ↗
7. H. Tanimoto, P. Farber, R. Würschum et al.: Nanostr. Materials Vol. 12 (1999), p.681.10.1016/S0965-9773(99)00216-0 ↗
8. S. Chakravarty, U. Tietze, D. Lott, N.P. Lalla, A. Gupta, H. Schmidt: submitted to Phys. Rev. B.
9. L.G. Harrison: Trans. Faraday Soc. Vol. Vol. 57 (1961), p.1191.10.1039/tf9615701191 ↗
10. H. Schmidt, M. Gupta, J. Stahn, T. Gutberlet, M. Bruns: Acta Mater. Vol. 56 (2008), p.464.10.1016/j.actamat.2007.10.005 ↗
11. A. van den Beukel, S. Radelaar: Acta Metall. Vol. 31 (1983), p.419.10.1016/0001-6160(83)90219-5 ↗
12. M. Lübbehusen, H. Mehrer: Acta Metall. Mater. Vol. 38 (1990), p.283.10.1016/0956-7151(90)90058-O ↗
13. S.V. Divinski, J. Geise, E. Rabkin, C. Herzig: Zeitschr. Metallkd. Vol. 95 (2004), p.945.10.3139/146.018036 ↗
14. A. Inoue, H. Nitta, Y. Iijima: Acta Mater. Vol. 55 (2007), p.5910.10.1016/j.actamat.2007.06.041 ↗
15. Y. Iijima: J. Phase Equili. Diff. Vol. 26 (2005), p.466.10.1007/s11669-005-0036-1 ↗