journal article·2026-04-08Open access

Evaluation of the Potential of Laser Shock Peening Compared with Cold Expansion for Improving Fatigue Resistance of Riveted Lap Joints of Aerospace Grade 7175 Al Alloy

Ogün Baris Tapar, David Osman Busse, Maximilian Sprengel, Domenico Furfari, Marc‐André Nielsen, Guilherme Abreu Faria, Jérémy Epp

Advanced Engineering Materials· Volume 28· Issue 7

Abstract

Cold expansion is widely used in repairing and manufacturing rivet lap joints in the aerospace industry. However, it bears inherent disadvantages such as nonsymmetrical residual stress, considerable surface deformation, and tensile zones that may initiate cracks. Limited process flexibility makes it challenging to fully overcome these issues. Given its high penetration depth and flexible parameter adjustments, laser shock peening (LSP) may offer a promising alternative for treating rivet areas. To investigate the effects of LSP parameters on residual stresses, a systematic parameter study is conducted, involving extensive X‐ray diffraction residual stress analyses and fatigue testing. Upon determining an optimal parameter matrix, fatigue tests are conducted on laser‐peened, cold‐expanded, and untreated samples. Subsequently, an energy dispersive synchrotron X‐ray investigation is performed in order to understand the effect of LSP on residual stress evolution and the local material behavior in rivet lap joints. For this experiment, laser‐peened, cold‐expanded, and untreated samples are submitted to fatigue tests at defined cycles. The residual stress distribution around the rivet area is then analyzed for each sample to evaluate residual stress stability and changes post‐loading. As a final step, fracture surface analyses are performed via optical and scanning electron microscopy.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Surface Treatment and Residual Stress · Ultrasound and Cavitation Phenomena · Erosion and Abrasive Machining

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Division Materials Science Leibniz Institute for Materials Engineering — IWT Badgasteiner Str. 3 28359 Bremen Germany

AIRBUS Operations GmbH ZAL Tech Center Hein‐Saß‐Weg 22 21129 Hamburg Germany

Helmholtz‐Zentrum Hereon Institut für Werkstoffphysik c/o DESY, Notkestr. 85 22607 Hamburg Germany

MAPEX Centre for Materials and Processes University of Bremen Badgasteiner Str. 3 28359 Bremen Germany

Funding

Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Climate Action

References (70)

Show source-provided references
1. Zhao H. · Manuf. Rev. · 2020 · 7 · 40
2. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2014.11.00410.1016/j.compstruct.2014.11.004 ↗
3. Childs P. R. N. · 2018 · 773
4. Müller R. P. · 1995
5. 10.1007/978-94-007-4282-610.1007/978-94-007-4282-6 ↗
6. 10.1111/j.1460-2695.1995.tb00879.x10.1111/j.1460-2695.1995.tb00879.x ↗
7. 10.1007/s00170-014-6688-410.1007/s00170-014-6688-4 ↗
8. 10.1007/s00170-012-4504-610.1007/s00170-012-4504-6 ↗
9. Lei C. · Adv. Mech. Eng. · 2017 · 9
10. 10.2514/1.C03371510.2514/1.C033715 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.tws.2022.11004110.1016/j.tws.2022.110041 ↗
12. 10.3390/coatings1102023610.3390/coatings11020236 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2006.12.01010.1016/j.ijfatigue.2006.12.010 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2013.01.01410.1016/j.ijfatigue.2013.01.014 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2016.09.00710.1016/j.ijfatigue.2016.09.007 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2008.08.00510.1016/j.ijfatigue.2008.08.005 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2020.10575110.1016/j.ijfatigue.2020.105751 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.matdes.2009.08.01610.1016/j.matdes.2009.08.016 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2021.10600810.1016/j.engfailanal.2021.106008 ↗
20. 10.2514/1.1832010.2514/1.18320 ↗
21. 10.2514/1.2368410.2514/1.23684 ↗
22. Phillips J. L. · 1974
23. 10.1016/j.tafmec.2022.10371510.1016/j.tafmec.2022.103715 ↗
24. Reid L. · 1993
25. 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2009.08.00210.1016/j.engfailanal.2009.08.002 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2022.10733910.1016/j.ijfatigue.2022.107339 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.mtcomm.2023.10629010.1016/j.mtcomm.2023.106290 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2016.01.01510.1016/j.ijmecsci.2016.01.015 ↗
29. Wang Y. l. · Int. J. Fatigue · 2017 · 95 · 219
30. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2017.08.02310.1016/j.ijfatigue.2017.08.023 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2019.04.02110.1016/j.ijfatigue.2019.04.021 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2021.10625310.1016/j.ijfatigue.2021.106253 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2014.07.02210.1016/j.engfailanal.2014.07.022 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2017.04.02410.1016/j.jmatprotec.2017.04.024 ↗
35. 10.1007/s11665-020-04577-410.1007/s11665-020-04577-4 ↗
36. Sollier A. · Appl. Phys. · 2001 · 16 · 131
37. 10.1016/S1003-6326(14)63150-210.1016/S1003-6326(14)63150-2 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.optlastec.2020.10642310.1016/j.optlastec.2020.106423 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.optlastec.2019.01.03710.1016/j.optlastec.2019.01.037 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.matdes.2012.07.02410.1016/j.matdes.2012.07.024 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.optlastec.2015.09.00810.1016/j.optlastec.2015.09.008 ↗
42. Busse D. O. · 2017
43. 10.12989/sem.2015.53.5.86710.12989/sem.2015.53.5.867 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.matdes.2018.01.05410.1016/j.matdes.2018.01.054 ↗
45. Noyan I. C. · 1987
46. Hauk V. · 1997
47. ASTM E739‐23: Standard Guide for Statistical Analysis of Linear or Linearized Stress‐Life (S‐N) and Strain‐Life (e‐N) Fatigue Data 2023.
48. P. J.Mohr D. B.Newell B. N.Taylor E.Tiesinga NIST Standard Reference Database (n.d.).https://physics.nist.gov/cuu/Constants/index.html.
49. 10.1016/S0142-1123(98)00016-410.1016/S0142-1123(98)00016-4 ↗
50. 10.1007/s11668-008-9146-510.1007/s11668-008-9146-5 ↗
51. 10.1016/j.optlastec.2018.05.01810.1016/j.optlastec.2018.05.018 ↗
52. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.09.13810.1016/j.apsusc.2017.09.138 ↗
53. 10.3390/cryst1302021210.3390/cryst13020212 ↗
54. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2021.16301110.1016/j.jallcom.2021.163011 ↗
55. 10.1108/1757986111110864410.1108/17579861111108644 ↗
56. 10.1016/j.msea.2011.12.07210.1016/j.msea.2011.12.072 ↗
57. 10.1016/j.optlastec.2015.04.02710.1016/j.optlastec.2015.04.027 ↗
58. 10.3390/met906065510.3390/met9060655 ↗
59. 10.3390/met1110163510.3390/met11101635 ↗
60. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2019.03.09310.1016/j.apsusc.2019.03.093 ↗
61. 10.1016/j.msea.2012.04.00210.1016/j.msea.2012.04.002 ↗
62. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2014.05.01510.1016/j.ijfatigue.2014.05.015 ↗
63. 10.1016/j.matdes.2016.09.01710.1016/j.matdes.2016.09.017 ↗
64. 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2023.10758610.1016/j.engfailanal.2023.107586 ↗
65. 10.1016/j.triboint.2023.10842210.1016/j.triboint.2023.108422 ↗
66. 10.1016/j.corsci.2022.11079210.1016/j.corsci.2022.110792 ↗
67. Murakami Y. · 2019
68. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2009.01.00910.1016/j.ijfatigue.2009.01.009 ↗
69. Domínguez J. · Frett. Wear Frett. Fatigue Fundam. Princ. Appl. · 2022 · 335
70. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2020.10602510.1016/j.ijfatigue.2020.106025 ↗