journal article·2020-08

RETRACTED ARTICLE: A multicenter retrospective 3D study of cleft lip and palate casts to evaluate dental shape, size, and anomalies in eruption around the cleft area before fixed orthodontic treatment

Akram Idrys, Beste Kamiloğlu, Ayşe Tuba Altuğ

Journal of Nanoparticle Research· Volume 22· Issue 8
This record is marked as retracted by the source. Review the publisher’s notice before using its findings.
Publisher page

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate tooth crown size in patients with cleft lip and palate (CLP), right cleft lip and palate (RCLP), and left cleft lip and palate (LCLP) subtypes and compare them between each other and between class I control group. A total of 110 patients, 55 patients’ records with CLP (28 male, 27 female) and the same number of 55 patients’ records with class I (27 male, 28 female) as control group, have been included. All plaster models were scanned with dental scanner and then analyzed using digital program to measure tooth size. When comparing right and left side of LCLP group, mesio-distal (MD) and labio-lingual (LL) dimensions of the centrals have the significant difference, where the largest dimensions were the right centrals (p < 0.05). When comparing right and left side of RCLP group, labio-lingual (LL) dimensions of the canines have the significant difference, where the largest dimensions were the right canines (p < 0.05). In class I group, there were no significant differences between right and left sides. There was a significant mean difference in Centrals MD, Centrals LL, and Canines LL (p < 0.05) between all groups when comparing the right sides and left sides alone, where class I group has the largest mean between all groups. Cleft lip and palate patients were noticed to have significant dental anomalies that affect the number, shape, and size of the teeth. These anomalies can impair function and affect the psychology of the patients. Therefore, a dental analysis focusing on restoring the esthetics as much as function should be considered when treating these patients. Dental materials with nanoparticles ranged from 1 to 100 nm showed to have better integration with dental tissues and the future of nanotechnology is very exciting in dental practice.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Cleft Lip and Palate Research · dental development and anomalies · Dental Trauma and Treatments

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (35)

Show source-provided references
1. Abou Neel EA, Bozec L, Perez RA, Kim HW, Knowles JC (2015) Nanotechnology in dentistry: prevention, diagnosis, and therapy. Int J Nanomedicine 10:637110.2147/IJN.S86033 ↗
2. Akcam MO, Toygar TU, Özer L, Özdemir B (2008) Evaluation of 3-dimensional tooth crown size in cleft lip and palate patients. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 134(1):85–9210.1016/j.ajodo.2006.05.048 ↗
3. Akcam MO, Evirgen S, Uslu O, Memikoğlu UT (2010) Dental anomalies in individuals with cleft lip and/or palate. Eur J Orthodontics 32(2):207–21310.1093/ejo/cjp156 ↗
4. Al-Khateeb SN, Abu Alhaija ES (2006) Tooth size discrepancies and arch parameters among different malocclusions in a Jordanian sample. Angle Orthodontist 76(3):459–465
5. Araujo E, Souki M (2003) Bolton anterior tooth size discrepancies among different malocclusion groups. Angle Orthodontist 73(3):307–313
6. Asquith JA, McIntyre GT (2012) Dental arch relationships on three-dimensional digital study models and conventional plaster study models for patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate. Cleft Palate-craniofac J 49(5):530–53410.1597/10-099 ↗
7. Basaran G, Selek M, Hamamcı O, Akkuş Z (2006) Intermaxillary Bolton tooth size discrepancies among different malocclusion groups. Angle Orthodontist 76(1):26–30
8. Bishara SE, Jakobsen JR, Treder JE, Stasl MJ (1989) Changes in the maxillary and mandibular tooth size-arch length relationship from early adolescence to early adulthood: a longitudinal study. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 95(1):46–5910.1016/0889-5406(89)90135-2 ↗
9. Camporesi M, Baccetti T, Marinelli A, Defraia E, Franchi L (2010) Maxillary dental anomalies in children with cleft lip and palate: a controlled study. Int J Paediatr Dent 20(6):442–45010.1111/j.1365-263X.2010.01063.x ↗
10. Christensen K, Juel K, Herskind AM, Murray JC (2004) Long term follow up study of survival associated with cleft lip and palate at birth. Bmj 328(7453):140510.1136/bmj.38106.559120.7C ↗
11. Cua-Benward GB, Dibaj S, Ghassemi B (1992) The prevalence of congenitally missing teeth in class I, II, III malocclusions. J Clin Pediatr Identistry 17(1):15–17
12. Dawood A, Marti BM, Sauret-Jackson V, Darwood A (2015) 3D printing in dentistry. Br Dent J 219(11):521–52910.1038/sj.bdj.2015.914 ↗
13. Foster TD, Lavelle CB (1971) The size and dentition in complete cleft lip and palate. Cleft Palate J 8(2):177–184
14. Hales S, Tokita E, Neupane R, Ghosh U, Elder B, Wirthlin D, Kong YL (2020) 3D printed nanomaterial-based electronic, biomedical, and bioelectronic devices. Nanotechnology 31(17):17200110.1088/1361-6528/ab5f29 ↗
15. Jaksˇić N, Sˇćepan I, Glisˇić B, Stamenic E, Stamenković Z (2002) Mesiodistal size of deciduous teeth in subjects with unilateral cleft lip and palate. Orthod Craniofacial Res 5(1):17–2110.1034/j.1600-0544.2002.01180.x ↗
16. Kasparova M, Grafova L, Dvorak P, Dostalova T, Prochazka A, Eliasova H, Prusa J, Kakawand S (2013) Possibility of reconstruction of dental plaster cast from 3D digital study models. Biomed Eng Online 12(1):4910.1186/1475-925X-12-49 ↗
17. Keating AP, Knox J, Bibb R, Zhurov AI (2008) A comparison of plaster, digital and reconstructed study model accuracy. J Orthod 35(3):191–20110.1179/146531207225022626 ↗
18. Konstantinidis EI, Bamparopoulos G, Billis A, Bamidis PD (2015) Internet of things for an age-friendly healthcare. In MIE (pp. 587-591)
19. Kusnoto B, Evans CA (2002) Reliability of a 3D surface laser scanner for orthodontic applications. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 122(4):342–34810.1067/mod.2002.128219 ↗
20. Lavelle CLB (1972) Maxillary and mandibular tooth size in different racial groups and in different occlusal categories. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 61(1):29–3710.1016/0002-9416(72)90173-X ↗
21. Leifert MF, Leifert MM, Efstratiadis SS, Cangialosi TJ (2009) Comparison of space analysis evaluations with digital models and plaster dental casts. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 136(1):16–e110.1016/j.ajodo.2009.03.002 ↗
22. Menezes R, Vieira AR (2008) Dental anomalies as part of the cleft spectrum. Cleft Palate-Craniofac J 45(4):414–41910.1597/07-064.1 ↗
23. Mitchell L (2007) An introduction to orthodontics. Oxford University Press, Oxford
24. Mullen SR, Martin CA, Ngan P, Gladwin M (2007) Accuracy of space analysis with emodels and plaster models. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 132(3):346–35210.1016/j.ajodo.2005.08.044 ↗
25. Ngai CW, Martin WL, Tonks A, Wyldes MP, Kilby MD (2005) Are isolated facial cleft lip and palate associated with increased perinatal mortality? A cohort study from the West Midlands region, 1995–1997. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 17(3):203–20610.1080/14767050500072854 ↗
26. Nie Q, Lin J (1999) Comparison of intermaxillary tooth size discrepancies among different malocclusion groups. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 116(5):539–54410.1016/S0889-5406(99)70186-1 ↗
27. Paranaiba LMR, Coletta RD, Swerts MSO, Quintino RP, De Barros LM, Martelli-Júnior H (2013) Prevalence of dental anomalies in patients with nonsyndromic cleft lip and/or palate in a Brazilian population. Cleft Palate-Craniofac J 50(4):400–40510.1597/11-029 ↗
28. Răducanu AM, Didilescu AC, Feraru IV, Dumitrache MA, Hănţoiu TA, Ionescu E (2015) Considerations on morphological abnormalities of permanent teeth in children with cleft lip and palate. Romanian J Morphol Embryol 56(2):453–457
29. Ranta R (1986) A review of tooth formation in children with cleft lip/palate. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 90(1):11–1810.1016/0889-5406(86)90022-3 ↗
30. Salagare S, Prasad R (2020) An overview of internet of dental things: new frontier in advanced dentistry. Wirel Pers Commun 110(3):1345–137110.1007/s11277-019-06790-4 ↗
31. Sassouni V (1969) A classification of skeletal facial types. Am J Orthod 55(2):109–12310.1016/0002-9416(69)90122-5 ↗
32. Smith SS, Buschang PH, Watanabe E (2000) Interarch tooth size relationships of 3 populations: “does Bolton’s analysis apply?”. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 117(2):169–17410.1016/S0889-5406(00)70228-9 ↗
33. Stuart Hunter W, Priest WR (1960) Errors and discrepancies in measurement of tooth size. J Dent Res 39(2):405–41410.1177/00220345600390022301 ↗
34. Wangpichit K, Huntington NL, Kapala JT (2001) Comparison of three nonradiographic methods of mixed dentition analysis in cleft lip and palate patients. Pediatr Dent 23(6):476–480
35. Werner SP, Harris EF (1989) Odontometrics of the permanent teeth in cleft lip and palate: systemic size reduction and amplified asymmetry. Cleft Palate J 26(1):36–41