Prototype Design for Grading Structures in Powder Bed Fusion Processes
Source abstract
Abstract
While targeted alignment in certain additive manufacturing (AM) methods such as material extrusion (MEX) and stereolithography (SLA) has been well documented in the research community, a method for targeted alignment of added fillers or fibrous materials in powder bed fusion (PBF) AM devices has yet to be successfully achieved. Similarly, incorporation of multimaterials does not work easily with any of the AM technologies. This study creates a prototype design that could be integrated into a PBF system to allow for multimaterial layer deposition and alignment of powders and powder blends. The rheological properties of polyamide powder and a range of polyamide composite blends (incorporating milled carbon fibre, graphite flakes, polytetrafluoroethylene, and glass microspheres) in different concentrations were studied, and together with the particle size distribution and particle morphology analysis were applied for the design of a prototype hopper for incorporation in the PBF system to create targeted multimaterial deposition. Different concept designs, multichambered and multi-hopper with hopper angles calculated specifically for the composite blend powders selected, were proposed. Initial deposition trials outside a PBF process were tested, and the deposited layers were measured.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes · 3D Printing in Biomedical Research
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Centre for Additive Layer Manufacturing, Exeter Technologies Group, Streatham Campus, University of Exeter, Exeter, United Kingdom.
QinetiQ, Advanced Services and Products, Cody Technology Park, Ively Road, Farnborough, United Kingdom.
References (67)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.10.10510.1016/j.compositesb.2018.10.105 ↗
2. 10.1002/app.3986110.1002/app.39861 ↗
3. 10.1155/2011/89194010.1155/2011/891940 ↗
4. 10.15376/biores.11.1.1176-118810.15376/biores.11.1.1176-1188 ↗
5. 10.1177/089270571879479210.1177/0892705718794792 ↗
6. 10.1002/app.2547910.1002/app.25479 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.matdes.2009.03.01110.1016/j.matdes.2009.03.011 ↗
8. 10.3390/jcs403010810.3390/jcs4030108 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.optlastec.2019.01.01210.1016/j.optlastec.2019.01.012 ↗
10. Jansson A, , Pejryd L. Characterisation of carbon fibre-reinforced polyamide manufactured by selective laser sintering. Addit Manuf, 2016; 9:7–13.
11. Aerosint. Selective Powder Deposition for Powder Bed Fusion 3D Printing. Available from: https://aerosint.com/about [Last accessed: April2 2023].
12. Binder M Anstaett C Herzer F et al. Potentials and Challenges of Multi-Material Processing by Laser-Based Powder Bed Fusion. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/328803491_POTENTIALS_AND_CHALLENGES_OF_MULTI-MATERIAL_PROCESSING_BY_LASER-BASED_POWDER_BED_FUSION [Last accessed: April2 2023].
13. Beal VE Erasenthiran P Hopkinson N et al. Fabrication of x-graded H13 and Cu powder mix using high power pulsed Nd:YAG laser. Int'l Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium; 2004; pp. 49–64.
14. Yardimci AM, , Guceri SI, , Danforth SC, et al. Numerical modeling of fused deposition processing. Am Soc Mech Eng, 1995; 69:1225–1235.
15. 10.1007/s00107-017-1274-810.1007/s00107-017-1274-8 ↗
16. 10.1088/1757-899X/670/1/01202010.1088/1757-899X/670/1/012020 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2014.10.00910.1016/j.compscitech.2014.10.009 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.addma.2016.06.00810.1016/j.addma.2016.06.008 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.matdes.2017.06.01110.1016/j.matdes.2017.06.011 ↗
20. 10.1007/s40964-017-0019-x10.1007/s40964-017-0019-x ↗
21. 10.1016/j.matdes.2004.02.00910.1016/j.matdes.2004.02.009 ↗
22. 10.3390/ma1316344210.3390/ma13163442 ↗
23. Hoque MJ, , Chakraborty S, , Mahbub M, et al. Thermal conductivity of polypropylene based composite materials filled with graphite and carbon black. Int J Compos Mater, 2013; 3(5):136–140.
24. 10.3390/jcs102001710.3390/jcs1020017 ↗
25. 10.1108/RPJ-08-2015-009810.1108/RPJ-08-2015-0098 ↗
26. 10.3390/ma1108141310.3390/ma11081413 ↗
27. Mohammed MI Das A Gomez-Kervin E et al. EcoPrinting: Investigating the Use of 100% Recycled Acrylonitrile Butadiene Styrene (ABS) for Additive Manufacturing. In: Proceedings of the 28th Annual International Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium Austin TX August 7–9 2017; pp. 532–542.
28. 10.3390/ma1223395510.3390/ma12233955 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.prostr.2020.04.05610.1016/j.prostr.2020.04.056 ↗
30. 10.1002/admt.20180027110.1002/admt.201800271 ↗
31. 10.1007/s10853-006-6320-610.1007/s10853-006-6320-6 ↗
32. 10.1177/002199831664616910.1177/0021998316646169 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2015.05.01410.1016/j.compositesa.2015.05.014 ↗
34. 10.1002/app.1249610.1002/app.12496 ↗
35. 10.1557/jmr.2014.21210.1557/jmr.2014.212 ↗
36. Products News. Advances in Carbon Fiber 3D Printing. Reinforced Plastics. 2019. Available from: https://www.reinforcedplastics.com/content/products/advances-in-carbon-fiber-3d-printing [Last accessed: April2 2023].
37. 10.3390/ma907058310.3390/ma9070583 ↗
38. 10.1002/adma.20147023510.1002/adma.201470235 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2015.05.01410.1016/j.compositesa.2015.05.014 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.polymer.2014.02.01510.1016/j.polymer.2014.02.015 ↗
41. 10.1021/acsnano.6b0477110.1021/acsnano.6b04771 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.10760010.1016/j.compositesb.2019.107600 ↗
43. 10.1073/pnas.171515711510.1073/pnas.1715157115 ↗
44. 10.1177/002199831037890510.1177/0021998310378905 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2004.10.01010.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2004.10.010 ↗
46. 10.1088/0960-1317/17/12/01910.1088/0960-1317/17/12/019 ↗
47. 10.1002/app.1092110.1002/app.10921 ↗
48. 10.1063/1.36656110.1063/1.366561 ↗
49. 10.1088/0964-1726/25/2/02LT0110.1088/0964-1726/25/2/02LT01 ↗
50. 10.1016/j.ultras.2009.07.01010.1016/j.ultras.2009.07.010 ↗
51. 10.1121/1.39943510.1121/1.399435 ↗
52. 10.1109/TUFFC.2012.231610.1109/TUFFC.2012.2316 ↗
53. 10.1016/j.ultras.2013.12.00110.1016/j.ultras.2013.12.001 ↗
54. Kozuka T Tuziuti T Mitome H et al. Acoustic Micromanipulation Using a Multi-Electrode Transducer. In: Proceedings of the Seventh International Symposium on Micro Machine and Human Science Nagoya Japan 1996; pp. 163–170.10.1109/MHS.1996.563418 ↗
55. Courtney C, , Ong C, , Drinkwater B, et al. Manipulation of particles in two dimensions using phase controllable ultrasonic standing waves. Proc Royal Soc A Math Phys Eng Sci, 2011; 468(2138):337–360.
56. 10.1088/1361-6439/aa62b710.1088/1361-6439/aa62b7 ↗
57. 10.1080/21663831.2018.143131710.1080/21663831.2018.1431317 ↗
58. Mehos G Morgan D. Hopper Design Principles—Chemical Engineering. Chemical Engineering. 2016. Available from: https://www.chemengonline.com/hopper-design-principles [Last accessed: September8 2022].
59. Freemantech.co.uk. New FT4 Powder Rheometer Software. 2022. Available from: https://www.freemantech.co.uk/news/new-software-for-freeman-technology-ft4-simplifies-hopper-design [Last accessed: May4 2022].
60. Gunt.de. 2023. CE 210 flow of bulk solids from silos. Available from: https://www.gunt.de/en/products/process-engineering/mechanical-process-engineering/storage-and-flow-of-bulk-solids/flow-of-bulk-solids-from-silos/083.21000/ce210/glct-1:pa-148:ca-237:pr-14 [Last accessed: January14 2022].
61. Teflon.com. 2022. Zonyl™ MP 1100 safety data sheet. Available from: https://www.teflon.com/en/-/media/files/teflon/zonyl-mp-1100-product-info.pdf?revd888aa649a4a4f58a8223063705345fe&hash=3557D68DBE5F0A0A6CB10D8CCE428F0B [Last accessed: September7 2022].
62. Sigmaaldrich.com. 2022. Glass spheres safety data sheet. Available from: https://www.sigmaaldrich.com/GB/en/sds/aldrich/440345 [Last accessed: September7 2022].
63. Sigmaaldrich.com. 2022. Graphite flakes safety data sheet. Available from: https://www.sigmaaldrich.com/GB/en/sds/aldrich/332461 [Last accessed: September7 2022].
64. Media.easycomposites.co.uk. 2022. Milled carbon fibre safety data sheet. Available from: https://media.easycomposites.co.uk/datasheets/EC-SDS-Carbiso-Milled-Carbon-Fibre.pdf [Last accessed: September7 2022].
65. 10.1016/j.msea.2006.07.11210.1016/j.msea.2006.07.112 ↗
66. Mehos G Morgan D. Hopper Design Principles—Chemical Engineering. 2016. Available from: https://www.chemengonline.com/hopper-design-principles/?printmode=1 [Last accessed: May17 2020].
67. Gunt.de. Products. 2021. Available from: https://www.gunt.de/en/products/process-engineering/mechanical-process-engineering/storage-and-flow-of-bulk-solids/flow-of-bulk-solids-from-silos/083.21000/ce210/glct-1:pa-148:ca-237:pr-14 [Last accessed: January14 2021].