journal article·2017-08

Relaxation time: a proton NMR-based approach as a metric to measure reactivity of engineered nanomaterials

Archini Paruthi, Superb K. Misra

Journal of Nanoparticle Research· Volume 19· Issue 8
Publisher page

Abstract

The toxicological impact of engineered nanoparticles in environmental or biological milieu is very difficult to predict and control because of the complexity of interactions of nanoparticles with the varied constituents in the suspended media. Nanoparticles are different from their bulk counterparts due to their high surface area-to-volume ratio per unit mass, which plays a vital role in bioavailability of these nanoparticles to its surroundings. This study explores how changes in the spin-spin nuclear relaxation time can be used to gauge the availability of surface area and suspension stability of selected nanoparticles (CuO, ZnO, and SiO2), in a range of simulated media. Spin-spin nuclear relaxation time can be mathematically correlated to wetted surface area, which is well backed up by the data of hydrodynamic size measurements and suspension stability. We monitored the change in spin-spin relaxation time for all the nanoparticles, over a range of concentrations (2.5 –100 ppm) in deionized water and artificial seawater. Selective concentrations of nanoparticle suspensions were subjected for temporal studies over a period of 48 hrs to understand the concept of spin-spin nuclear relaxation time-based reactivity of nanoparticle suspension. The nanoparticles showed high degree of agglomeration, when suspended in artificial seawater. This was captured by a decrease in spin-spin nuclear relaxation time and also an increment in the hydrodynamic size of the nanoparticles.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: NMR spectroscopy and applications · Nanoparticles: synthesis and applications · Electrochemical Analysis and Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (14)

Show source-provided references
1. Adamson AW, Gast AP (1997) Physical chemistry of surfaces, 6th edn. John Wiley & Sons Inc, New York (NY), p 347
2. Cooper CL, Cosgrove T, van Duijneveldt JS, Murray M, Prescott SW (2013) The use of solvent relaxation NMR to study colloidal suspensions. Soft Matter 9(30):7211–7228. doi: 10.1039/C3SM51067K10.1039/C3SM51067K ↗
3. Fairhurst D, Cosgrove T, Prescott SW (2016) Relaxation NMR as a tool to study the dispersion and formulation behavior of nanostructured carbon materials. Magn Reson Chem 54(6):521–526. doi: 10.1002/mrc.421810.1002/mrc.4218 ↗
4. Halle B, Piculell L (1986) Water spin relaxation in colloidal systems. Part 3.—interpretation of the low-frequency dispersion. J Chem Soc Faraday Trans 1: Phys Chem Condens Phases 82(2):415–42910.1039/f19868200415 ↗
5. Misra SK, Dybowska A, Berhanu D, Luoma SN, Valsami-Jones E (2012) The complexity of nanoparticle dissolution and its importance in nanotoxicological studies. Sci Total Environ 438:225–232. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.08.06610.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.08.066 ↗
6. Patterson a L (1939) The Scherrer formula for X-ray particle size determination. Phys Rev 56(10):978–982. doi: 10.1103/PhysRev.56.97810.1103/PhysRev.56.978 ↗
7. Rabolli V, Thomassen LCJ, Uwambayinema F, Martens J a, Lison D (2011) The cytotoxic activity of amorphous silica nanoparticles is mainly influenced by surface area and not by aggregation. Toxicol Lett 206(2):197–203. doi: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2011.07.01310.1016/j.toxlet.2011.07.013 ↗
8. Sager TM, Castranova V (2009) Surface area of particle administered versus mass in determining the pulmonary toxicity of ultrafine and fine carbon black: comparison to ultrafine titanium dioxide. Part Fibre Toxicol 6:15. doi: 10.1186/1743-8977-6-1510.1186/1743-8977-6-15 ↗
9. Schirmer W (1999) Physical chemistry of surfaces. Zeitschrift Für Physikalische Chemie, 210 (Part 1), 134–135. http://doi.org/10.1524/zpch.1999.210.Part_1.13410.1524/zpch.1999.210.Part_1.134 ↗
10. Sears GW (1956) Determination of specific surface area of colloidal silica by titration with sodium hydroxide. Anal Chem 28(12):1981–1983. doi: 10.1021/ac60120a04810.1021/ac60120a048 ↗
11. Tiede K, Hassellöv M, Breitbarth E, Chaudhry Q, Boxall ABA, Hutton S, Yo Y (2009) Considerations for environmental fate and ecotoxicity testing to support environmental risk assessments for engineered nanoparticles. J Chromatogr A 1216(3):503–509. doi: 10.1016/j.chroma.2008.09.00810.1016/j.chroma.2008.09.008 ↗
12. US Environmental Protection Agency (2002) Methods for Measuring the Acute Toxicity of Effluents and Receiving Waters to Freshwater and Marine Organisms Fifth Edition October 2002. Environmental Protection, (October), 266. http://doi.org/EPA-821-R-02-012
13. Van Hoecke K, De Schamphelaere KA, Van Der Meeren P, Phane Lucas S, Janssen CR (2008) Ecotoxicity of silica nanoparticles to the green alga Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata: importance of surface area. Environ Toxicol Chem 27(9):1948–1957. doi: 10.1897/07-634.110.1897/07-634.1 ↗
14. Warheit DB (2008) How meaningful are the results of nanotoxicity studies in the absence of adequate material characterization? Toxicol Sci 101(2):183–185. doi: 10.1093/toxsci/kfm27910.1093/toxsci/kfm279 ↗