journal article·2024-12-01Open access

Bone Ingrowth Simulation Within the Hexanoid, a Novel Scaffold Design

Yuheng Wang, Luping Wang, Nicolas Soro, Pascal R. Buenzli, Zhiyong Li, Nicholas Green, Kevin Tetsworth, Deniz Erbulut

Abstract

The utilization of bone scaffold implants represents a promising approach for repairing substantial bone defects. In recent years, various traditional scaffold structures have been developed and, with advances in materials biology and computer technology, novel scaffold designs are now being evaluated. This study investigated the effects of a novel scaffold unit cell design (Hexanoid) through a computational framework, comparing its performance to that of four well-known scaffold designs. A finite element analysis numerical simulation and mechanical testing were conducted to analyze the dynamic bone ingrowth process and the mechanical strength of the different scaffold designs. Bone formation within the Ti-6Al-4V metal scaffolds was simulated based on the theory of bone remodeling. The outcomes of the study reveal that the novel scaffold design (Hexanoid) attains a notably elevated ultimate bone volume fraction (∼27%), it outperformed conventional unit-cell designs found in extant literature, such as cubic design with 19.1% and circular design with 16.9% in relation to the bone-to-cavity volume ratio. This novel structure also has comparable mechanical strength to that of human compact bone tissue. While the design was not optimal in every category, it provided a very satisfactory overall performance regarding certain key aspects of bone performances in comparison with the five scaffold structures evaluated. Although limitations exist in this project, similar methodologies can also be applied in the primary evaluation of new scaffold structures, resulting in improved efficiency and effectiveness. In future research, the results of this project may be integrated with clinical rehabilitation processes to offer a critical evaluation for optimization of additional novel scaffold unit-cell structure designs.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Bone Tissue Engineering Materials · Titanium Alloys Microstructure and Properties · Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Orthopedics Program, Herston Biofabrication Institute, Block 7 Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Herston, Queensland, Australia.

Doctor of Medicine Program, School of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.

Faculty of Engineering, Department of Mechanical, Medical and Process Engineering, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.

Centre for Advanced Material Processing and Manufacturing, Department of Mechanical and Mining Engineering, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.

Faculty of Science, Department of Mathematical Sciences, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Herstone, Queensland, Australia.

References (45)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1097/00003086-198604000-0003610.1097/00003086-198604000-00036 ↗
2. 10.1002/btpr.24610.1002/btpr.246 ↗
3. 10.1002/jbm.b.3096210.1002/jbm.b.30962 ↗
4. 10.1007/s00586-008-0745-310.1007/s00586-008-0745-3 ↗
5. 10.1002/jor.2129010.1002/jor.21290 ↗
6. Konda P · J Pharm Biomed Sci · 2012 · 16 · 11
7. 10.1016/S1369-7021(11)70058-X10.1016/S1369-7021(11)70058-X ↗
8. 10.1007/s11837-008-0031-110.1007/s11837-008-0031-1 ↗
9. 10.1186/s13018-022-02960-610.1186/s13018-022-02960-6 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.jmapro.2023.04.03010.1016/j.jmapro.2023.04.030 ↗
11. 10.1108/RPJ-02-2022-004210.1108/RPJ-02-2022-0042 ↗
12. 10.1016/B978-0-12-824459-3.00011-110.1016/B978-0-12-824459-3.00011-1 ↗
13. 10.1007/s10237-022-01635-910.1007/s10237-022-01635-9 ↗
14. 10.3390/jcs602004610.3390/jcs6020046 ↗
15. 10.1016/S0010-4485(03)00134-910.1016/S0010-4485(03)00134-9 ↗
16. 10.1007/s10237-010-0199-510.1007/s10237-010-0199-5 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.matlet.2020.12792110.1016/j.matlet.2020.127921 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.10.05610.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.10.056 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.cobme.2018.04.00110.1016/j.cobme.2018.04.001 ↗
20. 10.1186/s13036-021-00255-810.1186/s13036-021-00255-8 ↗
21. Monshi M · Nanomed J · 2020 · 7 · 138
22. 10.1007/s10237-020-01339-y10.1007/s10237-020-01339-y ↗
23. 10.3390/ma1215235510.3390/ma12152355 ↗
24. 10.1145/319120.31912610.1145/319120.319126 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2004.10.01910.1016/j.jbiomech.2004.10.019 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.injury.2008.10.03510.1016/j.injury.2008.10.035 ↗
27. 10.1126/science.286.5442.110210.1126/science.286.5442.1102 ↗
28. 10.1016/0021-9290(87)90030-310.1016/0021-9290(87)90030-3 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.bone.2012.09.00810.1016/j.bone.2012.09.008 ↗
30. 10.1002/jor.110013040510.1002/jor.1100130405 ↗
31. 10.1016/0021-9290(92)90056-710.1016/0021-9290(92)90056-7 ↗
32. 10.1002/ar.109226040310.1002/ar.1092260403 ↗
33. 10.1007/s00170-020-06174-010.1007/s00170-020-06174-0 ↗
34. Fatah N · Design and development of scaffolds for tissue engineering using three-dimensional printing for bio-based applications. 3D Print Addit Manuf · 2016 · 3 · 119
35. 10.1088/1757-899X/1051/1/01201610.1088/1757-899X/1051/1/012016 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2022.10527510.1016/j.jmbbm.2022.105275 ↗
37. 10.7150/ijbs.1315810.7150/ijbs.13158 ↗
38. 10.1098/rsif.2008.006410.1098/rsif.2008.0064 ↗
39. 10.1007/s10439-013-0748-z10.1007/s10439-013-0748-z ↗
40. 10.1007/s10237-018-1103-y10.1007/s10237-018-1103-y ↗
41. 10.1111/cid.1203310.1111/cid.12033 ↗
42. 10.3390/polym1509212910.3390/polym15092129 ↗
43. Sun J · International Conference on Machine Learning and Intelligent Systems Engineering (MLISE) · 2021 · 9
44. 10.1016/0021-9290(93)90042-D10.1016/0021-9290(93)90042-D ↗
45. 10.1016/0021-9290(91)90386-210.1016/0021-9290(91)90386-2 ↗