Enhancing Fatigue Performance by Tuning of Residual Stresses in Welded Joints through Nanometallic Multilayer
Source abstract
Abstract
Welded joints suffer from reduced fatigue life due to geometric stress concentrations and metallurgical changes in the heat‐affected zone that promote crack initiation under cyclic loading. This study investigates a novel postweld treatment, utilizing a Cu/Ni nanometallic multilayer thin film deposited onto the welded butt joint. Deposition current densities and individual Cu/Ni layer thicknesses are systematically varied to optimize fatigue performance. A multiscale residual stress (RS) analysis characterizes stress states within individual multilayers and in the steel substrate, indicating all substrate RS are compressive in nature after thin film deposition. Results demonstrate a direct correlation between compressive RS magnitude and fatigue strength improvement. Tested at Δ σ R = 0.75 × f y , a more than a 300% increase in cycles to failure is seen compared to the as‐welded condition. This postweld treatment offers a promising approach for extending the operational life of welded structures across industrial applications.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Welding Techniques Analysis · Surface Treatment and Residual Stress · Microstructure and mechanical properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Hamburg University of Technology Institute for Metal and Composite Structures Denickestraße 17 21073 Hamburg Germany
Helmholtz‐Zentrum hereon GmbH Max‐Planck‐Straße 1 21502 Geesthacht Germany
References (56)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.resconrec.2013.11.01410.1016/j.resconrec.2013.11.014 ↗
2. 10.1038/srep4025510.1038/srep40255 ↗
3. Totten G. · 2008
4. 10.1007/s40194-014-0190-310.1007/s40194-014-0190-3 ↗
5. 10.1051/matecconf/20181652100310.1051/matecconf/201816521003 ↗
6. Hobbacher A. · 2018
7. 10.1007/978-981-10-2504-410.1007/978-981-10-2504-4 ↗
8. 10.1533/978178242065110.1533/9781782420651 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.msea.2007.06.09210.1016/j.msea.2007.06.092 ↗
10. 10.1088/0022-3727/42/5/05541110.1088/0022-3727/42/5/055411 ↗
11. 10.1016/S0142-1123(01)00153-010.1016/S0142-1123(01)00153-0 ↗
12. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.561-565.239310.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.561-565.2393 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2006.01.02710.1016/j.scriptamat.2006.01.027 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.msea.2014.05.02410.1016/j.msea.2014.05.024 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2020.08.05010.1016/j.scriptamat.2020.08.050 ↗
16. 10.2174/187650330110401000910.2174/1876503301104010009 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.tsf.2010.10.02510.1016/j.tsf.2010.10.025 ↗
18. A.Gitschthaler R.Hahn L.Zauner T.Wojcik F.Fahrnberger H.Hutter A.Davydok C.Krywka C.Jerg J.Ramm A.Eriksson S.Kolozsvári P.Polcik H.Riedl Enhancing the High-Cycle Fatigue Strength of Ti-Al-N Coated Ti-6al-4v by Residual Stress Design2025.10.2139/ssrn.5178777 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2007.03.03210.1016/j.surfcoat.2007.03.032 ↗
20. 10.1038/s41598-023-49192-010.1038/s41598-023-49192-0 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2022.11450110.1016/j.scriptamat.2022.114501 ↗
22. 10.1002/stab.20210004210.1002/stab.202100042 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2017.06.03210.1016/j.scriptamat.2017.06.032 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2020.11368710.1016/j.scriptamat.2020.113687 ↗
25. Rutner M. · Struct. Integr. Procedia · 2025 · 67
26. Seidelmann M. · Structural Integr. Procedia · 2025 · 67
27. 10.1002/stab.20240004810.1002/stab.202400048 ↗
28. N.Spalek J.Stührenberg A.Tandon M.Tourneau A.Patel B.Große Robot-Based Installation of Nanostructured Metal Multilayers on Civil Infrastructure2024.
29. Spalek N. · Structural Integr. Procedia · 2025 · 67
30. Falah M. · Struct. Integr. Procedia · 2025 · 67
31. DIN 50125:2022-08 · 2022
32. DIN 50100:2016-12 · 2016
33. 10.1016/j.mee.2015.01.04210.1016/j.mee.2015.01.042 ↗
34. 10.1149/1.222330210.1149/1.2223302 ↗
35. 10.1016/S0013-4686(97)82474-710.1016/S0013-4686(97)82474-7 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.msea.2003.09.07310.1016/j.msea.2003.09.073 ↗
37. T.Gnaeupel-Herold IsoDEC: Software for Calculating Diffraction Elastic Constants2016.
38. 10.1007/978-3-8348-8232-510.1007/978-3-8348-8232-5 ↗
39. M.Storm G.Lotze Pydidas - Python Diffraction Data Analysis Suite 2025.
40. Hauk V. · 2006
41. 10.1007/s00170-016-8998-110.1007/s00170-016-8998-1 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.matdes.2016.07.08910.1016/j.matdes.2016.07.089 ↗
43. 10.1023/A:102504980263510.1023/A:1025049802635 ↗
44. 10.1149/2.048312jes10.1149/2.048312jes ↗
45. 10.1007/s11340-018-00447-210.1007/s11340-018-00447-2 ↗
46. 10.1016/S0257-8972(99)00328-X10.1016/S0257-8972(99)00328-X ↗
47. Gale W.F. · 2004
48. 10.1088/0370-1301/64/9/30310.1088/0370-1301/64/9/303 ↗
49. 10.1080/14786435.2016.122516810.1080/14786435.2016.1225168 ↗
50. 10.1557/S088376940005150210.1557/S0883769400051502 ↗
51. 10.1134/S106378422012025710.1134/S1063784220120257 ↗
52. 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2023.12986810.1016/j.surfcoat.2023.129868 ↗
53. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2017.07.20010.1016/j.jallcom.2017.07.200 ↗
54. 10.3390/mi1312208410.3390/mi13122084 ↗
55. Abadias G. · J. Vacuum Sci. Technol. A · 2018 · 36
56. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.88.15610310.1103/PhysRevLett.88.156103 ↗