journal article·2019-08Open access

Effects of ultrasonic scaling on the optical properties and surface characteristics of highly translucent CAD/CAM ceramic restorative materials: An in vitro study

Jae-Hyun Lee, Sung-Hun Kim, Jung-Suk Han, In-Sung Luke Yeo, Hyung-In Yoon, Jungwon Lee

Ceramics International· Volume 45· Issue 12

Abstract

Esthetic restorations using highly translucent ceramics powered by chairside digital dentistry are becoming popular. The purpose of this in vitro study was to investigate the impact of ultrasonic scaling on the optical and surface properties of highly translucent ceramic materials for digital dentistry. A resin nanoceramic (Lava Ultimate; LU), dual-network ceramic (Vita Enamic; VE), feldspathic ceramic (Vitablocs Mark II; VM), lithium disilicate ceramic (IPS e.max CAD; EX), and high-translucency monolithic zirconia (Rainbow Shine-T; MZ) were evaluated. All specimens were subjected to ultrasonic scaling, and the following data were obtained before and after scaling: color change (ΔE00), translucency parameter, surface gloss, surface roughness, and superficial topography. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), repeated-measures ANOVA, and two-way ANOVA were used for intergroup comparisons (all α = 0.05). The mean ΔE00 values were 0.243, 0.48, 1.591, 0.143, and 4.466 for LU, VE, VM, EX, and MZ, respectively, with statistically significant differences among the materials. With regard to Commission Internationale de l'Éclairage (CIE) L*, a*, and b* values, VE, VM, and MZ showed significantly decreased L* values relative to the baseline values. Moreover, MZ showed a significantly increased a* value and a significantly decreased b* value after scaling. Ultrasonic scaling also resulted in significant changes in the surface gloss of the LU, VE, VM, and MZ specimens. Micrographs showed scrapes and surface deterioration after scaling. For all materials, the translucency parameter and the surface roughness showed no significant differences between specimens that were subjected to scaling and those that were not. These findings suggest that ultrasonic scaling MARKEDLY affects the optical properties and surface characteristics of highly translucent computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) ceramics. The findings can aid restorative dentists in the selection of appropriate materials and motivate periodontists for performing scaling procedures with due consideration of restorations in esthetically demanding areas.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Dental materials and restorations · Dental Research and COVID-19 · Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (38)

Show source-provided references
1. The current state of chairside digital dentistry and materials10.1016/j.cden.2018.11.002 ↗
2. Survey on the use of CAD-CAM technology by UK and Irish dental technicians10.1038/sj.bdj.2017.407 ↗
3. Survey of UK dentists regarding the use of CAD-CAM technology10.1038/sj.bdj.2016.862 ↗
4. Five year clinical outcomes and survival of chairside CAD-CAM ceramic laminate veneers - a retrospective study10.1016/j.jpor.2018.05.004 ↗
5. Dental biomaterials for chairside CAD-CAM: state of the art10.4047/jap.2017.9.6.486 ↗
6. Speed sintering translucent zirconia for chairside one-visit dental restorations: optical, mechanical, and wear characteristics10.1016/j.ceramint.2017.05.141 ↗
7. Chairside CAD-CAM materials. Part 1: measurement of elastic constants and microstructural characterization10.1016/j.dental.2016.10.009 ↗
8. Effect of thickness on optical properties of monolithic CAD-CAM ceramics10.1016/j.jdent.2018.01.010 ↗
9. Mechanical and optical properties of monolithic CAD-CAM restorative materials10.1016/j.prosdent.2017.06.012 ↗
10. Translucency of IPS e.max and cubic zirconia monolithic crowns10.1016/j.prosdent.2017.09.007 ↗
11. Root instrumentation. Power-driven versus manual scalers, which one?10.1016/S0011-8532(22)00588-2 ↗
12. Ultrasonic instrumentation instruction in dental hygiene programs in the United States
13. The significance of maintenance care in the treatment of periodontal disease10.1111/j.1600-051X.1981.tb02039.x ↗
14. The long-term effect of a plaque control program on tooth mortality, caries and periodontal disease in adults. Results after 30 years of maintenance10.1111/j.1600-051X.2004.00563.x ↗
15. Comparison of the site-specificity of supragingival and subgingival calculus deposition10.1902/jop.1998.69.1.1 ↗
16. Age-related changes of the dental aesthetic zone at rest and during spontaneous smiling and speech10.1093/ejo/cjn009 ↗
17. Comparison of surface roughness of oral hard materials to the threshold surface roughness for bacterial plaque retention: a review of the literature10.1016/S0109-5641(97)80038-3 ↗
18. The influence of surface free energy and surface roughness on early plaque formation. An in vivo study in man10.1111/j.1600-051X.1990.tb01077.x ↗
19. An investigation of the effect of scaling-induced surface roughness on bacterial adhesion in common fixed dental restorative materials10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.04.005 ↗
20. Surface properties of dental zirconia ceramics affected by ultrasonic scaling and low-temperature degradation10.1371/journal.pone.0203849 ↗
21. An in vitro evaluation of alumina, zirconia, and lithium disilicate surface roughness caused by two scaling instruments10.1111/jopr.12424 ↗
22. An in vitro evaluation of zirconia surface roughness caused by different scaling methods10.1016/S0022-3913(10)60059-5 ↗
23. Surface changes of metal alloys and high-strength ceramics after ultrasonic scaling and intraoral polishing10.4047/jap.2017.9.3.188 ↗
24. In vitro analysis of the efficacy of ultrasonic scalers and a toothbrush for removing bacteria from resorbable blast material titanium disks10.1902/jop.2012.120369 ↗
25. Instrumentation with ultrasonic scalers facilitates cleaning of the sandblasted and acid-etched titanium implants10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-13-00078 ↗
26. Evaluation of the repeatability and matching accuracy between two identical intraoral spectrophotometers: an in vivo and in vitro study10.4047/jap.2018.10.3.252 ↗
27. Influence of implant abutment material on the color of different ceramic crown systems10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.04.004 ↗
28. The development of the CIE 2000 colour-difference formula: CIEDE200010.1002/col.1049 ↗
29. Translucency parameter of colorants for maxillofacial prostheses
30. Color difference thresholds in dental ceramics10.1016/j.jdent.2010.07.008 ↗
31. Color difference thresholds in dentistry
32. Applicability of CIELAB/CIEDE2000 formula in visual color assessments of metal ceramic restorations10.1016/j.jdent.2012.04.011 ↗
33. Dental ceramics: a CIEDE2000 acceptability thresholds for lightness, chroma and hue differences10.1016/j.jdent.2011.09.007 ↗
34. Effect of finishing and polishing on the surface roughness and gloss of feldspathic ceramic for chairside CAD-CAM systems10.2341/15-174-L ↗
35. Nine prophylactic polishing pastes: impact on discoloration, gloss, and surface properties of a CAD-CAM resin composite10.1007/s00784-018-2440-z ↗
36. Effect of finishing and polishing on roughness and gloss of lithium disilicate and lithium silicate zirconia reinforced glass ceramic for CAD-CAM systems10.2341/16-381-L ↗
37. Surface deterioration of monolithic CAD-CAM restorative materials after artificial abrasive toothbrushing10.4047/jap.2018.10.4.271 ↗
38. The in vivo perception of roughness of restorations10.1038/sj.bdj.4810881 ↗