Behavior of protruding lateral plane graphene sheets in liquid dodecane: molecular dynamics simulations
Source abstract
Abstract
Molecular dynamics simulations are used to investigate the behavior of two parallel graphene sheets fixed on one edge (lateral plane) in liquid dodecane. The interactions of these sheets and dodecane molecules are studied with different starting inter-sheet distances. The structure of the dodecane solvent is also analyzed. The results show that when the distance between the two graphene sheets is short (less than 6.8 A), the sheets will expel the dodecane molecules between them and stack together. However, when the distance between two sheets is large (greater than 10.2 A), the two sheets do not come together, and the dodecane molecules will form ordered layers in the interlayer spacing. The equilibrium distance between the graphene sheets can only take on specific discrete values (3.4, 7.8, and 12.1 A), because only an integer number of dodecane layers forms between the two sheets. Once the graphene sheets are in contact, they remain in contact; the sheets do not separate to allow dodecane into the interlayer spacing.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Graphene research and applications · Carbon Nanotubes in Composites · Molecular Junctions and Nanostructures
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (31)
Show source-provided references
1. Arash B, Wang Q, Varadan VK (2014) Mechanical properties of carbon nanotube/polymer composites. Scientific Reports 4:6479. doi: 10.1038/srep0647910.1038/srep06479 ↗
2. Asche TS, Behrens P, Schneider AM (2016) Validation of the COMPASS force field for complex inorganic–organic hybrid polymers. J Sol-Gel Sci Technol. doi: 10.1007/s10971-016-4185-y10.1007/s10971-016-4185-y ↗
3. Du X, Skachko I, Barker A, Andrei EY (2008) Approaching ballistic transport in suspended graphene. Nat Nanotechnol 3:491–495. doi: 10.1038/nnano.2008.19910.1038/nnano.2008.199 ↗
4. Ebrahimi S, Ghafoori-Tabrizi K, Rafii-Tabar H (2012) Multi-scale computational modelling of the mechanical behaviour of the chitosan biological polymer embedded with graphene and carbon nanotube. Comp Mater Sci 53:347–353. doi: 10.1016/j.commatsci.2011.08.03410.1016/j.commatsci.2011.08.034 ↗
5. Georgakilas V, Otyepka M, Bourlinos AB, Chandra V, Kim N, Kemp KC et al (2012) Functionalization of graphene: covalent and non-covalent approaches, derivatives and applications. Chem Rev 112(11):6156–6214. doi: 10.1021/cr300041210.1021/cr3000412 ↗
6. Hu K, Kulkarni DD, Choi I, Tsukruk VV (2014) Graphene-polymer nanocomposites for structural and functional applications. Prog Polym Sci 39:1934–1972. doi: 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2014.03.00110.1016/j.progpolymsci.2014.03.001 ↗
7. Huang X, Qi X, Boey F, Zhang H (2012) Graphene-based composites. Chem Soc Rev 41:666–686. doi: 10.1039/C1CS15078B10.1039/C1CS15078B ↗
8. Jang C, Nouranian S, Lacy TE, Gwaltney SR, Toghiani H, Pittman CU Jr (2012) Molecular dynamics simulations of oxidized vapor-grown carbon nanofiber surface interactions with vinyl ester resin monomers. Carbon 50:748–760. doi: 10.1016/j.carbon.2011.09.01310.1016/j.carbon.2011.09.013 ↗
9. Kango S, Kalia S, Celli A, Njuguna J, Habibi Y, Kuma R (2013) Surface modification of inorganic nanoparticles for development of organic–inorganic nanocomposites—a review. Prog Polym Sci 38:1232–1261. doi: 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2013.02.00310.1016/j.progpolymsci.2013.02.003 ↗
10. Kuila T, Bose S, Mishra AK, Khanra P, Kim NH, Lee JH (2012) Chemical functionalization of graphene and its applications. Prog Mater Sci 57:1061–1105. doi: 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2012.03.00210.1016/j.pmatsci.2012.03.002 ↗
11. Kuilla T, Bhadra S, Yao DH, Kim NH, Bose S, Lee JH (2010) Recent advances in graphene based polymer composites. Prog Polym Sci 35:1350–1375. doi: 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2010.07.00510.1016/j.progpolymsci.2010.07.005 ↗
12. Lee C, Wei XD, Kysar JW, Hone J (2008) Measurement of the elastic properties and intrinsic strength of monolayer graphene. Science 321:385–388. doi: 10.1126/science.115799610.1126/science.1157996 ↗
13. Li D, Müller MB, Gilje S, Kane RB, Wallace GG (2008) Processable aqueous dispersions of graphene nanosheets. Nat Nanotechnol 3:101–105. doi: 10.1038/nnano.2007.45110.1038/nnano.2007.451 ↗
14. Mittal G, Dhand V, Rhee KY, Park S-J, Lee WR (2015) A review on carbon nanotubes and graphene as fillers in reinforced polymer nanocomposites. J Ind Eng Chem 21:11–25. doi: 10.1016/j.jiec.2014.03.02210.1016/j.jiec.2014.03.022 ↗
15. Montazeria A, Rafii-Tabar H (2011) Multiscale modeling of graphene- and nanotube-based reinforced polymer nanocomposites. Phys Lett A 375:4034–4040. doi: 10.1016/j.physleta.2011.08.07310.1016/j.physleta.2011.08.073 ↗
16. Nouranian S, Jang C, Lacy TE, Gwaltney SR, Toghiani H, Pittman CU Jr (2011) Molecular dynamics simulations of vinyl ester resin monomer interactions with a pristine vapor-grown carbon nanofiber and their implications for composite interphase formation. Carbon 49:3219–3232. doi: 10.1016/j.carbon.2011.03.04710.1016/j.carbon.2011.03.047 ↗
17. Novoselov KS, Geim AK, Morozov SV, Jiang D, Zhang Y, Dubonos SV et al (2004) Electric field effect in atomically thin carbon films. Science 306:666–669. doi: 10.1126/science.110289610.1126/science.1102896 ↗
18. Rafiee MA, Lu W, Thomas AV, Zandiatashbar A, Rafiee J, Tour JM et al (2010) Graphene nanoribbon composites. ACS Nano 4:7415–7420. doi: 10.1021/nn102529n10.1021/nn102529n ↗
19. Sadasivuni KK, Ponnamma D, Thomas S, Grohens Y (2014) Evolution from graphite to graphene elastomer composites. Prog Polym Sci 39:749–780. doi: 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2013.08.00310.1016/j.progpolymsci.2013.08.003 ↗
20. Si Y, Samulski ET (2008a) Synthesis of water soluble graphene. Nano Lett 8:1679–1682. doi: 10.1021/nl080604h10.1021/nl080604h ↗
21. Si Y, Samulski ET (2008b) Exfoliated graphene separated by platinum nanoparticles. Chem Mater 20:6792–6797. doi: 10.1021/cm801356a10.1021/cm801356a ↗
22. Singh V, Joung D, Zhai L, Das S, Khondaker SI, Seal S (2011) Graphene based materials: past, present and future. Prog Mater Sci 56:1178–1271. doi: 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2011.03.00310.1016/j.pmatsci.2011.03.003 ↗
23. Stankovich S, Dikin DA, Dommett GHB, Kohlhaas KM, Zimney EJ, Stach EA et al (2006) Graphene-based composite materials. Nature 442:282–286. doi: 10.1038/nature0496910.1038/nature04969 ↗
24. Sun H (1998) COMPASS: an ab initio force-field optimized for condensed-phase applications: overview with details on alkane and benzene compounds. J Phys Chem B 102:7338–7364. doi: 10.1021/jp980939v10.1021/jp980939v ↗
25. Wei T, Luo G, Fan Z, Zheng C, Yan J, Yao C et al (2009) Preparation of graphene nanosheet/polymer composites using in situ reduction extractive dispersion. Carbon 47:2290–2299. doi: 10.1016/j.carbon.2009.04.03010.1016/j.carbon.2009.04.024 ↗
26. Wu TT, Xue QZ, Li XF, Tao YH, Jin YK, Ling CC, Lu SF (2016) Extraction of kerogen from oil shale with supercritical carbon dioxide:molecular dynamics simulations. J of Supercritical Fluids 107:499–506. doi: 10.1016/j.supflu.2015.07.00510.1016/j.supflu.2015.07.005 ↗
27. Yang SY, Lin WN, Huang YL, Tien HW, Wang JY, Ma CCM et al (2011) Synergetic effects of graphene platelets and carbon nanotubes on the mechanical and thermal properties of epoxy composites. Carbon 49:793–803. doi: 10.1016/j.carbon.2010.10.01410.1016/j.carbon.2010.10.014 ↗
28. Zhang J, Jiang D (2014) Molecular dynamics simulation of mechanical performance of graphene/graphene oxide paper based polymer composites. Carbon 67:784–791. doi: 10.1016/j.carbon.2013.10.07810.1016/j.carbon.2013.10.078 ↗
29. Zhang T, Xue Q, Zhang S, Dong M (2012) Theoretical approaches to graphene and graphene-based materials. Nano Today 7:180–200. doi: 10.1016/j.nantod.2012.04.00610.1016/j.nantod.2012.04.006 ↗
30. Zhao X, Zhang Q, Chen D, Lu P (2010) Enhanced mechanical properties of graphene-based poly(vinyl alcohol) composites. Macromolecules 43:2357–2363. doi: 10.1021/ma902862u10.1021/ma902862u ↗
31. Zheng QB, Xue QZ, Yan KY, Hao LZ, Li Q, Gao XL (2007) Investigation of molecular interactions between SWNT and polyethylene/polypropylene/polystyrene/polyaniline molecules. J Phys Chem C 111:4628–4635. doi: 10.1021/jp066077c10.1021/jp066077c ↗