journal article·2022-12

Durable Metallic Surfaces Capable of Passive and Active De‐Icing

Kamran Alasvand Zarasvand, Cory Pope, Saeed Nazari, David Orchard, Catherine Clark, Joshua Brinkerhoff, Kevin Golovin

Advanced Engineering Materials· Volume 24· Issue 12
Publisher page

Abstract

Ice accretion has adverse effects on several industrial sectors worldwide. Sparsely suspended, thin metallic sheets (buckling elastomer‐like anti‐icing metallic surfaces, or BEAMS) recently demonstrated extremely low ice adhesion strengths while maintaining durability. Here, BEAMS are designed using elastomeric suspension points shaped as channels, enabling active de‐icing by flowing air underneath the suspended sheet. The channel geometry is optimized using computational fluid dynamics by iterating through various channel dimensions and flow conditions. An experimental setup is constructed and utilized to assess BEAMS comprised of 1–4 channels. Active de‐icing is achieved by pressurizing the air within the channels to bulge the sheet outward and delaminate accreted ice from the interface. Active de‐icing is achieved by flowing room temperature air through the channels to heat the surface and melt the interface. Passive de‐icing is also observed under atmospheric icing conditions. Rime is accreted within an icing wind tunnel on multichannel BEAMS. Ice adhesion strengths <8 kPa are maintained after ten consecutive icing/de‐icing runs, demonstrating substantial durability. The active and passive de‐icing capability of channeled BEAMS makes it a promising candidate for improving the operational efficiency of infrastructure in cold environments.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Icing and De-icing Technologies · Surface Modification and Superhydrophobicity · Adhesion, Friction, and Surface Interactions

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Okanagan Polymer Engineering Research and Applications Laboratory School of Engineering University of British Columbia Kelowna BC V1V 1V7 Canada

Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering University of Toronto Toronto ON M5S 3G8 Canada

Okanagan Computational Fluid Dynamics Laboratory School of Engineering University of British Columbia Kelowna BC V1V 1V7 Canada

Aerospace Research Center National Research Council Canada Ottawa ON K1A 0R6 Canada

Department of Materials Science and Engineering University of Toronto Toronto ON M5S 3E4 Canada

Funding

Canada Foundation for Innovation

References (39)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1088/1742-6596/753/2/02202210.1088/1742-6596/753/2/022022 ↗
2. 10.1002/we.233310.1002/we.2333 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.coldregions.2018.01.00610.1016/j.coldregions.2018.01.006 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.renene.2020.12.01410.1016/j.renene.2020.12.014 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.rser.2007.11.00910.1016/j.rser.2007.11.009 ↗
6. 10.1002/we.47710.1002/we.477 ↗
7. 10.1260/0309-524X.37.1.5910.1260/0309-524X.37.1.59 ↗
8. 10.1115/1.403035210.1115/1.4030352 ↗
9. 10.1260/030952401149579110.1260/0309524011495791 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.energy.2016.08.04710.1016/j.energy.2016.08.047 ↗
11. J.Sabatier P.Lanusse B.Feytout S.Gracia inProc. of the 14th Int. Conf. on Informatics in Control Automation and Robotics Setubal: Science and Technology Publications Madrid Spain2017 Vol.1 pp.414–421.10.5220/0006403904140421 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.rser.2018.12.01910.1016/j.rser.2018.12.019 ↗
13. Mayer C. · Int. J. Offshore Polar Eng. · 2007 · 17 · 182
14. Fortin G. · Am. Inst. Aeronaut. Astronaut. · 2009 · 092407
15. 10.1021/acs.iecr.9b0293910.1021/acs.iecr.9b02939 ↗
16. 10.1039/C8MH01291A10.1039/C8MH01291A ↗
17. 10.1039/C9SM00162J10.1039/C9SM00162J ↗
18. 10.1126/sciadv.150149610.1126/sciadv.1501496 ↗
19. 10.1021/acsami.8b1966610.1021/acsami.8b19666 ↗
20. 10.1007/s11431-019-1482-x10.1007/s11431-019-1482-x ↗
21. 10.1021/am303127210.1021/am3031272 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.matlet.2018.09.00810.1016/j.matlet.2018.09.008 ↗
23. 10.1038/srep0219410.1038/srep02194 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.coldregions.2010.03.00410.1016/j.coldregions.2010.03.004 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.cej.2021.13258510.1016/j.cej.2021.132585 ↗
26. 10.1021/acs.langmuir.1c0168410.1021/acs.langmuir.1c01684 ↗
27. 10.1002/admi.20190125510.1002/admi.201901255 ↗
28. 10.1007/s10853-021-06295-110.1007/s10853-021-06295-1 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2022.10599410.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2022.105994 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.ohx.2020.e0014610.1016/j.ohx.2020.e00146 ↗
31. 10.1126/science.aav126610.1126/science.aav1266 ↗
32. 10.1002/admi.20210140210.1002/admi.202101402 ↗
33. J. T.Riley US. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration2006 DOT/FAA/AR-06/48.
34. Corcione M. · WSEAS Trans. Heat Mass Transf. · 2007 · 3 · 28
35. Bergman T. L. · 2011
36. Çengel Y. A. · 2018
37. 10.1016/j.ijnonlinmec.2013.06.01410.1016/j.ijnonlinmec.2013.06.014 ↗
38. Roslan A. · J. Appl. Environ. Biol. Sci. · 2017 · 7 · 54
39. Rønneberg S. · AIP Adv. · 2017 · 9 · 030701