journal article·2025-09Open access

Compressive strength as a screening tool for quality control of tubular honeycomb ceramic filters

Manuel A. García-Galán, Victor M. Candelario, Fernando Guiberteau, Angel L. Ortiz

Ceramics International· Volume 51· Issue 21

Abstract

Strength-based screening is proposed to complement the filtration-based screening for the quality control of tubular honeycomb ceramic filters. It is first shown how compressive failure loads can be measured, converted to failure strengths, and analysed with Weibull plots, and then this method is applied to industrial SiC filters at their four stages of the production chain demonstrating that toughness, not porosity or dominant pore size, determines the strength of these filters. Specifically, it was found that the green supports are the weakest (∼10.5 MPa strength) because they are simple compacts of particles weakly bound by only a dehydrated polymer. The sintered supports are much stronger (∼68.3 MPa strength) because they have developed a cohesive macroporous skeleton with inter-particle necks. Unexpectedly, the membrane-coated supports are weaker (∼56.7 MPa strength) than the sintered supports because the membrane sintering cycle embrittles the inter-particle necks, which dominates over the strengthening compressive stresses (∼16 MPa) introduced by the membrane layer. Lastly, the commercial filters finally put on the market are the strongest (∼122.3 MPa strength) because their oxidation cycle increases the cohesion of the macroporous skeleton. To conclude, the usefulness of the strength-based screening for the quality control of tubular ceramic filters is discussed.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Aerosol Filtration and Electrostatic Precipitation · Fluid Dynamics Simulations and Interactions · Lattice Boltzmann Simulation Studies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (36)

Show source-provided references
1. Treatment of oily wastewater produced from refinery processes using flocculation and ceramic membrane filtration10.1016/S1383-5866(03)00067-4 ↗
2. Ceramic membranes for water treatment10.2166/ws.2010.536 ↗
3. Membrane filtration technologies applied to municipal secondary effluents for potential reuse10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.12.045 ↗
4. Comparison of ceramic and polymeric membrane permeability and fouling using surface water10.1016/j.seppur.2011.03.025 ↗
5. Inorganic membranes for the recovery of effluent from municipal wastewater treatment plants10.1021/acs.iecr.5b00064 ↗
6. Application of microfiltration for the treatment of marcellus shale flowback water: influence of floc breakage on membrane fouling10.1016/j.memsci.2016.03.023 ↗
7. Processing of alumina-coated glass-bonded silicon carbide membranes for oily wastewater treatment10.1111/ijac.12693 ↗
8. A review on inorganic membranes for desalination and wastewater treatment10.1016/j.desal.2017.07.023 ↗
9. Silicon carbide-coated ceramic membrane bioreactor for sustainable water purification10.3390/membranes9040047 ↗
10. Process stability and comparative rDNA/rRNA community analyses in an anaerobic membrane bioreactor with silicon carbide ceramic membrane applications10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.02.166 ↗
11. Membrane fouling mechanisms in combined microfiltration-coagulation of algal rich water applying ceramic membranes10.3390/membranes9020033 ↗
12. Sustainability considerations in membrane-based technologies for industrial effluents treatment10.1016/j.cej.2019.02.075 ↗
13. Ceramic-based membranes for water and wastewater treatment10.1016/j.colsurfa.2019.05.074 ↗
14. A review on reverse osmosis and nanofiltration membranes for water purification10.3390/polym11081252 ↗
15. Enhanced fabrication of silicon carbide membranes for wastewater treatment: from laboratory to industrial scale10.1016/j.memsci.2020.118080 ↗
16. Permeability behavior of silicon carbide-based membrane and performance study for oily wastewater treatment10.1111/ijac.13463 ↗
17. Influence of HRT reduction on pilot-scale flat sheet submerged membrane bioreactor (sMBR) performances for oil&gas wastewater treatment10.1016/j.memsci.2019.117459 ↗
18. Ceramic nanocomposite membranes and membrane fouling: a review10.1016/j.watres.2020.115674 ↗
19. Corrosion resistant ZrO2/SiC ultrafiltration membranes for wastewater treatment and operation in harsh environments10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2021.07.054 ↗
20. Influencing factors on the performance of tubular ceramic membrane supports prepared by extrusion10.1016/j.ceramint.2020.12.235 ↗
21. A roadmap for the development and applications of silicon carbide membranes for liquid filtration: recent advancements, challenges, and perspectives10.1016/j.cej.2021.128826 ↗
22. Ceramic processing of silicon carbide membranes with the aid of aluminum nitrate nonahydrate: preparation, characterization, and performance10.3390/membranes11090714 ↗
23. Fabrication of B4C ultrafiltration membranes on SiC supports10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2022.02.035 ↗
24. From ultra to nanofiltration: a review on the fabrication of ZrO2 membranes10.1016/j.ceramint.2023.01.076 ↗
25. Separation of milk fat using silicon carbide support ceramic membranas with different pore sizes10.1016/j.ifset.2024.103671 ↗
26. Novel B4C supports for ceramic membrane filtration10.1016/j.ceramint.2024.09.389 ↗
27. Structural and physical-chemical properties of milk fat globules fractionated by a series of silicon carbide membranes10.1016/j.foodres.2024.114680 ↗
28. Davidge · 1980
29. Lawn · 1993
30. Barsoum · 1996
31. Wachtman · 1996
32. Evaluating the mechanical integrity and reliability of multi-channelled flat-sheet ceramic membranes for filtration applications10.1016/j.ceramint.2023.12.033 ↗
33. Meyers · 2009
34. A statistical theory of the strength of materials
35. A statistical distribution function of wide applicability10.1115/1.4010337 ↗
36. The prolific polytypism of silicon carbide10.1107/S0021889812049151 ↗