journal article·2023-08-01Open access

Generative Design of Structured Materials for Controlled Frequency Responses

Wuxin Yang, Loulin Huang, Sarat Singamneni

Abstract

Spatially varying material properties allow the dynamic response of structural systems to be almost arbitrarily tailored, far beyond the first or fundamental natural frequency. Continuing advances in manufacturing technology are making it possible to achieve the necessary range of stiffness and density variations, but the design of these property distributions is a challenging task because of the complex multidimensional nature of the problem. Generative design methods based on evolutionary optimization algorithms have been successfully used to obtain solutions based on multi-material distributions. However, the applicability of these solutions is limited by their reliance on multi-material additive manufacturing (AM), which currently only offers digitally mixed acrylic polymer options that are generally unsuitable to produce functional parts. A novel structured material solution is proposed here, in which the problem domain is divided into several volume elements (voxels), each of which contains a structure whose geometrical form is altered to adjust its effective properties to desired values. The single material structural solution will be amenable for ready fabrication by the powder-based selective laser sintering and melting processes with real engineering polymer and metal systems, thereby allowing for the realization of the benefits in real-world applications. The resulting continuous design spaces are searched using a modern evolutionary algorithm, the covariance matrix adaptation evolution strategy (CMA-ES). A MATLAB implementation of this evolutionary design method, in conjunction with finite element simulations for fitness evaluation, showed good convergence for several different cantilever beam test cases when tested against several different sets of target natural frequencies. Correlations with the multi-material solutions show that the single structured material approach is on par or even better in some cases, even though the test domain was discretized into 80% fewer voxels than for the multi-material case. Furthermore, the voxel structures can be realized using current AM technologies.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Topology Optimization in Engineering · Innovations in Concrete and Construction Materials · Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Mechanical Engineering, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand.

References (44)

Show source-provided references
1. Crowell B. Conceptual Physics 1st ed. Davis California: LibreText 2020.
2. 10.1038/s41567-019-0458-z10.1038/s41567-019-0458-z ↗
3. 10.1002/we.7910.1002/we.79 ↗
4. Osiander R Darrin MAG Champion JL. MEMS and Microstructures in Aerospace Applications. New York: CRC Press 2018.10.1201/9781420027747 ↗
5. Hepher T. Exclusive: Software under scrutiny in Airbus A220 engine failures: Reuters 2020 [cited March 3 2021]. Available from: https://www.reuters.com/article/us-airbus-a220-exclusive-idUSKBN1X31ST Accessed March3 2021.
6. 10.1016/j.sna.2008.03.00810.1016/j.sna.2008.03.008 ↗
7. Stappenbelt B Cooper P. Mechanical model of a floating oscillating water column wave energy conversion device. Annual Bulletin of the Australian Institute of High Energetic Materials. 2009 1. Wollongong NSW Australia. Wollongong: University of Wollongong; 2009. 34–45.
8. 10.1002/etep.174710.1002/etep.1747 ↗
9. Liu Y, , Cai Y, , Zhang Y, et al. Materials, design, and characteristics of bulk acoustic wave resonator: a review Micromachines, 2020;11:630.
10. Vonflotow AH Beard A Bailey D. Adaptive Tuned Vibration Absorbers: Tuning Laws Tracking Agility Sizing and Physical Implementations In: Noise-Con 1994 Fort Lauderdale FL US. NY: Poughkeepsie; 1994. 437–454.
11. Sun J, , Jolly MR, , Norris M. Passive, adaptive and active tuned vibration absorbers—A survey. Mech Des, 1995; 117(B):234–242.
12. 10.1016/S0924-0136(00)00585-910.1016/S0924-0136(00)00585-9 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2007.05.00710.1016/j.engstruct.2007.05.007 ↗
14. 10.1061/JSDEAG.000576010.1061/JSDEAG.0005760 ↗
15. Cheney N Ritz E Lipson H. Automated vibrational design and natural frequency tuning of multi-material structures. Proceedings of the 2014 Annual Conference on Genetic and Evolutionary Computation. Vancouver Canada 2014; pp. 1079–1086.10.1145/2576768.2598362 ↗
16. 10.1080/0305215X.2012.70402810.1080/0305215X.2012.704028 ↗
17. 10.2514/1.C03291310.2514/1.C032913 ↗
18. 10.1002/nme.48410.1002/nme.484 ↗
19. 10.1007/s00158-012-0840-210.1007/s00158-012-0840-2 ↗
20. 10.1007/s00158-007-0101-y10.1007/s00158-007-0101-y ↗
21. 10.1016/0045-7949(93)90035-C10.1016/0045-7949(93)90035-C ↗
22. 10.1016/S0045-7825(99)00309-610.1016/S0045-7825(99)00309-6 ↗
23. 10.2514/2.62610.2514/2.626 ↗
24. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1999)125:12(1432)10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1999)125:12(1432) ↗
25. 10.1016/j.finel.2015.07.01010.1016/j.finel.2015.07.010 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.cma.2015.12.01210.1016/j.cma.2015.12.012 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.compstruc.2009.11.01110.1016/j.compstruc.2009.11.011 ↗
28. 10.1007/s10710-007-9028-810.1007/s10710-007-9028-8 ↗
29. Yang W, , Calius E, , Huang L, et al. Artificial evolution and design for multi-material additive manufacturing. 3D Print Addit Manuf, 2020; 7.
30. 10.1016/S1359-6454(03)00441-510.1016/S1359-6454(03)00441-5 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.precisioneng.2020.04.02410.1016/j.precisioneng.2020.04.024 ↗
32. 10.1007/s11837-014-0886-210.1007/s11837-014-0886-2 ↗
33. Hašan M, , Fuchs M, , Matusik W, et al. Physical reproduction of materials with specified subsurface scattering. ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG), 2010; p. 61.
34. Hiller J Lipson H. Multi material topological optimization of structures and mechanisms. Proceedings of the 11th Annual conference on Genetic and evolutionary computation. Montréal Québec Canada 2009; pp. 1521–1528.10.1145/1569901.1570105 ↗
35. Bickel B, , Bächer M, , Otaduy MA, et al. Design and fabrication of materials with desired deformation behavior. ACM Trans Graph, 2010; 2010: ACM.
36. 10.1109/TRO.2011.217270210.1109/TRO.2011.2172702 ↗
37. 10.1108/1355254101104925210.1108/13552541011049252 ↗
38. Fischer T Herr CM. Teaching generative design. The Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Generative Art 2001. Generative Design Lab DiAP Politechnico di Milano University Milan Italy 2001.
39. 10.1162/10636560332182897010.1162/106365603321828970 ↗
40. 10.1162/10636560175019039810.1162/106365601750190398 ↗
41. Heris SMK. CMA-ES in MATLAB yarpiz: yarpiz 2015. Available from: https://yarpiz.com/235/ypea108-cma-es Accessed October9 2021.
42. 10.1115/1.291948010.1115/1.2919480 ↗
43. Chipperfield A Fleming P Pohlheim H et al. Genetic algorithm toolbox for use with MATLAB 1994 [cited October 10 2020]. Available from: https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.16.1178
44. EOS. PA 1101—Polyamide 11 White 2021 [cited September 9 2021]. Available from: https://www.eos.info/en/additive-manufacturing/3d-printing-plastic/sls-polymer-materials/pa-11-nylon-abs-pa6 Accessed September9 2021.