Comparison of Three Different Active Filler Metals Used for Brazing Ceramic‐to‐Ceramic and Ceramic‐to‐Metal
Source abstract
Abstract
Three active filler metals were studied to determine their suitability for joining Si3N4‐TiN composite ceramics. The evolution of the bend strength in the different setups could be explained using microstructural analysis, micro‐hardness measurement and finite element modelling. It was observed that residual stresses in ceramic‐to‐metal joints can be decreased more effective with plastic deformation than by reducing the brazing temperature.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced ceramic materials synthesis · Advanced materials and composites · Aluminum Alloys Composites Properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (10)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1007/BF0055230710.1007/BF00552307 ↗
2. 10.1007/BF0114880610.1007/BF01148806 ↗
3. 10.1016/0925-8388(94)06026-610.1016/0925-8388(94)06026-6 ↗
4. 10.1016/0272-8842(94)90027-210.1016/0272-8842(94)90027-2 ↗
5. W. Tillmann Aspekte des Aktivlötens nichtoxidischer IngenieurkeramikenDissertation RWTH Aachen 1992.
6. 10.1179/13621719778983291610.1179/136217197789832916 ↗
7. Janczak‐Rusch J. · Joining Ceram. – Glass. – Met. · 2002 · 41
8. M. K. Neilsen S. N. Burchett C. M. Stone J. J. Stephens A Viscoplastic Theory for Braze Alloys.1996 SANDIA. 1.10.2172/233338 ↗
9. M. K. Neilsen J. J. Stephens J. H. Gieske.A Viscoplastic Model for the Eutectic Silver‐Copper Braze Alloy. in IBSC 2003.2003. San Diego CA: AWS‐ASM.
10. M. Galli J. Botsis J. Janczak‐Rusch Adv. Eng. Mater.2006 this issue.