Advancing mechanical and biological characteristics of polymer-ceramic nanocomposite scaffolds for sport injuries and bone tissue engineering: A comprehensive investigation applying finite element analysis and artificial neural network
Source abstract
Abstract
In recent years, the application of polymer-ceramic nanocomposite scaffolds in bone tissue engineering has received considerable attention due to their structural similarity to natural bone tissue. Polycaprolactone (PCL) has emerged as a viable material for the fabrication of porous bone scaffolds. Composites that incorporate PCL with ceramic phases, such as nanocrystalline hydroxyapatite (n-HA) and tricalcium phosphate (TCP), have shown promise in promoting bone formation. Nevertheless, the use of bone scaffolds with complex geometries that mimic human bone poses challenges regarding their mechanical properties, which is the primary focus of this study. To assess the mechanical behavior of triangular nanostructures, particularly their ultimate compressive strength, finite element analysis (FEA) and artificial neural network (ANN) techniques were utilized. The obtained results were compared to experimental and analytical data. Three samples with varying weight percentages (0.1, 0.2, and 0.3) of HA and TCP nanoparticles embedded in PCL polymer were fabricated using a 3D fused deposition modeling technique. Scanning electron microscope (SEM) analysis was conducted to evaluate the morphology, while apatite formation rate and weight loss in simulated body fluid (SBF) and phosphate buffer saline (PBS) solution were assessed. The results revealed that a porosity of 76 % increases the apatite formation and dissolution rates by 23 % and 39 %, respectively. The SEM images, in conjunction with the simulated FEA models, indicated that scaffolds containing 0.3 wt% TCP nanoparticles exhibited favorable mechanical and biological properties for bone fracture applications. Additionally, the influence of different weight percentages of TCP and HA on the mechanical properties of the scaffolds was investigated using ANN. A neural network model was developed by incorporating 0.2 of each additive within a range of 0.1–0.3 while evaluating output data including elastic modulus, compressive strength, tensile strength, and Poisson's ratio. The predicted mechanical properties of the porous scaffold were subsequently analyzed and discussed.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Bone Tissue Engineering Materials · Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty · Bone fractures and treatments
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (66)
Show source-provided references
1. Design of lattice structures with controlled anisotropy10.1016/j.matdes.2016.01.007 ↗
2. Additive manufacturing of biomorphic scaffolds for bone tissue engineering10.1007/s00170-021-06773-5 ↗
3. Prediction of permeability of regular scaffolds for skeletal tissue engineering: a combined computational and experimental study10.1016/j.actbio.2011.12.021 ↗
4. Highly filled poly (l‐lactic acid)/hydroxyapatite composite for 3D printing of personalized bone tissue engineering scaffolds10.1002/app.49662 ↗
5. Design and properties of 3D scaffolds for bone tissue engineering10.1016/j.actbio.2016.06.032 ↗
6. The control of human mesenchymal cell differentiation using nanoscale symmetry and disorder10.1038/nmat2013 ↗
7. Minimal surface scaffold designs for tissue engineering10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.06.012 ↗
8. State-of-the-art in artificial neural network applications: a survey10.1016/j.heliyon.2018.e00938 ↗
9. Logistic regression and artificial neural network classification models: a methodology review10.1016/S1532-0464(03)00034-0 ↗
10. 3D printing of PVA/hexagonal boron nitride/bacterial cellulose composite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering10.1016/j.matdes.2020.109094 ↗
11. Porous scaffolds for bone regeneration
12. Hexagonal pore geometry and the presence of hydroxyapatite enhance deposition of mineralized bone matrix on additively manufactured polylactic acid scaffolds10.1016/j.msec.2021.112091 ↗
13. Optimization and fabrication of customized scaffold using additive manufacturing to match the property of human bone
14. Preparation, characterization, and drug delivery of hexagonal boron nitride-borate bioactive glass biomimetic scaffolds for bone tissue engineering10.3390/biomimetics8010010 ↗
15. Application of high resolution DLP stereolithography for fabrication of tricalcium phosphate scaffolds for bone regeneration10.1088/1748-605X/ab279d ↗
16. Additive manufacturing of bone scaffolds using polyjet and stereolithography techniques10.3390/app11167336 ↗
17. Effects of scaffold shape on bone regeneration: tiny shape differences affect the entire system10.1021/acsnano.2c03776 ↗
18. Using different unit-cell geometries to generate bone tissue scaffolds by additive manufacturing technology10.1177/09544119221099786 ↗
19. CFD simulation on permeability of porous scaffolds for human skeletal system10.11113/humentech.v1n1.11 ↗
20. Magnetic lanthanum-doped hydroxyapatite/chitosan scaffolds with endogenous stem cell-recruiting and immunomodulatory properties for bone regeneration10.1039/D0TB00342E ↗
21. Tuning the Poisson's ratio of poly (ethylene glycol) diacrylate/cellulose nanofibril aerogel scaffold precisely for cultivation of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cell
22. Topological design of a trabecular bone structure with morphology and mechanics control for additive manufacturing10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3050745 ↗
23. A biomimetic structural material with adjustable mechanical property for bone tissue engineering10.1002/adfm.202305412 ↗
24. Hydrothermal fabrication of ZSM‐5 zeolites: biocompatibility, drug delivery property, and bactericidal property10.1002/jbm.b.33037 ↗
25. Microwave synthesis, characterization, bioactivity and in vitro biocompatibility of zeolite–hydroxyapatite (Zeo–HA) composite for bone tissue engineering applications10.1016/j.ceramint.2014.07.038 ↗
26. Hydrothermal synthesis of zeolite composite membranes and crystals as potential vectors for drug-delivering biomaterials10.1016/j.micromeso.2012.04.024 ↗
27. Macrophage responses to selective laser‐melted Ti‐6Al‐4V scaffolds of different pore geometries and the corresponding osteoimmunomodulatory effects toward osteogenesis10.1002/jbm.a.37335 ↗
28. Compressive strength of β-TCP scaffolds fabricated via lithography-based manufacturing for bone tissue engineering10.1016/j.ceramint.2022.02.085 ↗
29. Design and analysis of various homogeneous interconnected scaffold structures for trabecular bone
30. Structural biomimetic scaffold modifications for bones
31. Patterned piezoelectric scaffolds for osteogenic differentiation10.3390/ijms21218352 ↗
32. Antibacterial nano-biocomposite scaffolds of Chitosan, Carboxymethyl Cellulose and Zn & Fe integrated Hydroxyapatite (Chitosan-CMC-FZO@ HAp) for bone tissue engineering10.1007/s10570-021-04072-6 ↗
33. A bifunctional zoledronate sustained-release system in scaffold: tumor therapy and bone repair10.1016/j.colsurfb.2022.113064 ↗
34. Effect of extrace llular matrix and dental pulp stem cells on bone regeneration with 3D printed PLA/HA composite scaffolds10.22203/eCM.v041a15 ↗
35. State-of-the-art in artificial neural network applications: a survey10.1016/j.heliyon.2018.e00938 ↗
36. Logistic regression and artificial neural network classification models: a methodology review10.1016/S1532-0464(03)00034-0 ↗
37. How useful is SBF in predicting in vivo bone bioactivity?10.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.01.017 ↗
38. Bioinspired TiO2/chitosan/HA coatings on Ti surfaces: biomedical improvement by intermediate hierarchical films10.1088/1748-605X/ac61fc ↗
39. Platelet-rich plasma incorporated electrospun PVA-chitosan-HA nanofibers accelerates osteogenic differentiation and bone reconstruction10.1016/j.gene.2019.144096 ↗
40. Osseoinduction potentiality of Mg implant coated with CNT/chitosan/HA composite on mesenchymal stem cells
41. Heterojunction engineering enhanced self‐polarization of PVDF/CsPbBr3/Ti3C2Tx composite fiber for ultra‐high voltage piezoelectric nanogenerator10.1002/advs.202300650 ↗
42. The mechanism of a PVDF/CsPbBr 3 perovskite composite fiber as a self-polarization piezoelectric nanogenerator with ultra-high output voltage10.1039/D2TA03559F ↗
43. PVDF/6H-SiC composite fiber films with enhanced piezoelectric performance by interfacial engineering for diversified applications10.1016/j.jmst.2023.04.071 ↗
44. Biological properties of polycaprolactone and barium titanate composite in biomedical applications10.1177/00368504231215942 ↗
45. Exploring the frontier of Polylactic Acid/Hydroxyapatite composites in bone regeneration and their revolutionary biomedical applications–A review10.1177/07316844241278045 ↗
46. Apatite insights: from synthesis to biomedical applications
47. Beyond hype: unveiling the Real challenges in clinical translation of 3D printed bone scaffolds and the fresh prospects of bioprinted organoids10.1186/s12951-024-02759-z ↗
48. Current options and future perspectives on bone graft and biomaterials substitutes for bone repair, from clinical needs to advanced biomaterials research10.3390/app13148471 ↗
49. Piezoelectric biomaterials inspired by nature for applications in biomedicine and nanotechnology10.1002/adma.202406192 ↗
50. Dispersion strategies of nanomaterials in polymeric inks for efficient 3D printing of soft and smart 3D structures: a systematic review
51. A review of biomimetic and biodegradable magnetic scaffolds for bone tissue engineering and oncology10.3390/ijms24054312 ↗
52. Hydroxyapatite composites in tissue engineering
53. Additive manufacturing techniques used for preparation of scaffolds in bone repair and regeneration
54. Various manufacturing methods and ideal properties of scaffolds for tissue engineering applications10.1016/j.smmf.2022.100011 ↗
55. Influence of process parameters on the characteristics of additively manufactured parts made from advanced biopolymers10.3390/polym15030716 ↗
56. Finite element study on the influence of pore size and structure on stress shielding effect of additive manufactured spinal cage10.1080/10255842.2021.1970142 ↗
57. The impact of multimodal pore size considered independently from porosity on mechanical performance and osteogenic behaviour of titanium scaffolds10.1016/j.msec.2021.112026 ↗
58. Unraveling of advances in 3D-printed polymer-based bone scaffolds10.3390/polym14030566 ↗
59. The fundamental property of human leg during walking: linearity and nonlinearity10.1109/TNSRE.2023.3339801 ↗
60. Peripheral nerve injury repair by electrical stimulation combined with graphene-based scaffolds10.3389/fbioe.2024.1345163 ↗
61. High-temperature ablation resistance prediction of ceramic coatings using machine learning10.1111/jace.20136 ↗
62. Study on craniocerebral dynamics response and helmet protective performance under the blast waves10.1016/j.matdes.2022.111408 ↗
63. Development of a 3D-printed bioabsorbable composite scaffold with mechanical properties suitable for treating large, load-bearingarticular cartilage defects10.22203/eCM.v045a11 ↗
64. DLP printing of BT/HA nanocomposite ceramic scaffolds using low refractive index BT crystals10.1016/j.jmat.2023.11.004 ↗
65. Nanomaterials for bone metastasis10.1016/j.jconrel.2024.07.067 ↗
66. Contrasting effects of various factors upon the properties of foam ceramics and the mechanisms of crystalline phase reconstruction and microstructure regulation10.1016/j.ceramint.2024.03.277 ↗