journal article·2024-04-01Open access

A Novel Cryogenic Approach to 3D Printing Cytocompatible, Conductive, Hydrogel-Based Inks

Aida Shoushtari Zadeh Naseri, Cormac Fay, Andrew Nattestad, Gregory Ryder, Sepidar Sayyar, Zhilian Yue, Xiao Liu, David L. Officer, Gordon G. Wallace

Abstract

In the field of tissue engineering and regenerative medicine, developing cytocompatible 3D conductive scaffolds that mimic the native extracellular matrix is crucial for the engineering of excitable cells and tissues. In this study, a custom cryogenic extrusion 3D printer was developed, which afforded control over both the ink and printing surface temperatures. Using this approach, aqueous inks were printed into well-defined layers with high precision. A conductive hydrogel ink was developed from chitosan (CS) and edge-functionalised expanded graphene (EFXG). Different EFXG:CS ratios (between 60:40 and 80:20) were evaluated to determine both conductivity and printability. Using the novel customized cryogenic 3D printer, conductive structures of between 2 and 20 layers were produced, with feature sizes as small as 200 μm. The printed structures are mechanically robust and are electrically conducting. The highest Young's modulus and conductivity in a hydrated state were 2.6 MPa and ∼45 S/m, respectively. Cytocompatibility experiments reveal that the developed material supports NSC-34 mouse motor neuron-like cells in terms of viability, attachment, and proliferation. The distinctive mechanical and electrical properties of the 3D-printed structures would make them good candidates for the engineering of 3D-structured excitable cells. Moreover, this novel printing setup can be used to print other hydrogel-based inks with high precision and resolution.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: 3D Printing in Biomedical Research · Neuroscience and Neural Engineering · Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Intelligent Polymer Research Institute and ARC Center of Excellence for Electromaterials Science, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia.

SMART Infrastructure Facility, Engineering and Information Sciences, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia.

School of Chemistry, Monash University, Clayton, Australia.

Australian National Fabrication Facility-Materials Node, Innovation Campus, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia.

References (63)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.msec.2020.11163210.1016/j.msec.2020.111632 ↗
2. 10.1002/smll.20180198310.1002/smll.201801983 ↗
3. 10.1088/1758-5090/aacd3010.1088/1758-5090/aacd30 ↗
4. 10.1002/adfm.20160535210.1002/adfm.201605352 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.actbio.2016.05.02710.1016/j.actbio.2016.05.027 ↗
6. 10.1002/smll.20160017810.1002/smll.201600178 ↗
7. 10.1088/1758-5090/ab0fd310.1088/1758-5090/ab0fd3 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.actbio.2019.07.04410.1016/j.actbio.2019.07.044 ↗
9. 10.1021/acs.biomac.7b0074910.1021/acs.biomac.7b00749 ↗
10. 10.1038/srep0427110.1038/srep04271 ↗
11. 10.1002/adfm.20150530410.1002/adfm.201505304 ↗
12. 10.1002/adfm.20190434410.1002/adfm.201904344 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.07.02010.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.07.020 ↗
14. 10.1038/s41427-018-0092-810.1038/s41427-018-0092-8 ↗
15. 10.1002/adma.20160361210.1002/adma.201603612 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.10.00210.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.10.002 ↗
17. Spencer A, , Primbetova A, , Koppes A, et al. Electroconductive gelatin methacryloyl-PEDOT:PSS composite hydrogels: Design, synthesis, and properties. ACS Biomater Sci Eng, 2018; 4(5):1558–1567; doi: 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.8b00135
18. 10.1016/j.nano.2016.08.02610.1016/j.nano.2016.08.026 ↗
19. 10.1088/1758-5090/aa53bc10.1088/1758-5090/aa53bc ↗
20. 10.1002/adma.20150642010.1002/adma.201506420 ↗
21. 10.1088/1758-5090/7/1/01500910.1088/1758-5090/7/1/015009 ↗
22. 10.1039/C4TB01636J10.1039/C4TB01636J ↗
23. 10.1038/nnano.2010.24610.1038/nnano.2010.246 ↗
24. Yongbin Zhang A. Cytotoxicity effects of graphene and single-wall carbon nanotubes in neural phaeochromocytoma-derived PC12 cells. J Am Chem Soc, 2010; 4(6):3181–3186.
25. 10.3390/polym904015010.3390/polym9040150 ↗
26. 10.1021/acsnano.5b0117910.1021/acsnano.5b01179 ↗
27. 10.1038/srep0160410.1038/srep01604 ↗
28. 10.1002/ppsc.20120006610.1002/ppsc.201200066 ↗
29. 10.1038/srep2171510.1038/srep21715 ↗
30. 10.1039/C7NR02943H10.1039/C7NR02943H ↗
31. 10.3390/nano1006112910.3390/nano10061129 ↗
32. Officer D Wallace G Jalili R et al. Dispersible Edge Functionalized Graphene Platelets WO2020073081A1 University of Wollongong Australia; 2020.
33. Faisal S Ryder G Walker A et al. Additive-Free Edge-Functionalised Graphene Dough. In Preparation 2022.
34. 10.1089/wound.2018.083110.1089/wound.2018.0831 ↗
35. 10.1089/ten.tea.2019.026510.1089/ten.tea.2019.0265 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.07.08910.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.07.089 ↗
37. 10.1021/bm401792u10.1021/bm401792u ↗
38. 10.1088/1758-5090/aa707710.1088/1758-5090/aa7077 ↗
39. 10.1088/1758-5090/ab0cf610.1088/1758-5090/ab0cf6 ↗
40. 10.1089/3dp.2018.010310.1089/3dp.2018.0103 ↗
41. 10.1089/3dp.2019.011510.1089/3dp.2019.0115 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2018.01.09710.1016/j.carbpol.2018.01.097 ↗
43. 10.1039/C6NR07516A10.1039/C6NR07516A ↗
44. 10.3389/fbioe.2020.0082410.3389/fbioe.2020.00824 ↗
45. 10.1089/3dp.2018.014810.1089/3dp.2018.0148 ↗
46. Athukorala S, , Tran T, , Balu R, et al. 3D printable electrically conductive hydrogel scaffolds for biomedical applications: A review. Polym Rev, 2021; 13(3):1–21; doi: 10.3390/polym13030474
47. 10.1021/acsami.9b0735310.1021/acsami.9b07353 ↗
48. 10.1016/j.actbio.2019.08.04410.1016/j.actbio.2019.08.044 ↗
49. 10.1089/3dp.2017.001910.1089/3dp.2017.0019 ↗
50. Liao C, , Wu W CH, , sieh C, et al. Design and development of a novel frozen-form additive manufacturing system for tissue engineering applications. 3D Print Addit Manuf, 2016; 3(4):217–225; doi: 10.1089/3dp.2015.0042
51. Carolo L. Available from: https://all3dp.com/2/commercial-3d-bioprinters/ [Last accessed: July 31 2021].
52. 10.1016/j.cryobiol.2015.10.15210.1016/j.cryobiol.2015.10.152 ↗
53. 10.1038/s41598-017-16668-910.1038/s41598-017-16668-9 ↗
54. 10.1038/ncomms796210.1038/ncomms7962 ↗
55. 10.1038/s41598-019-52042-710.1038/s41598-019-52042-7 ↗
56. 10.3389/fchem.2020.0008810.3389/fchem.2020.00088 ↗
57. 10.1038/s41598-017-17198-010.1038/s41598-017-17198-0 ↗
58. 10.18063/ijb.v7i3.39410.18063/ijb.v7i3.394 ↗
59. 10.1007/s12010-019-02967-610.1007/s12010-019-02967-6 ↗
60. 10.1002/polb.2349710.1002/polb.23497 ↗
61. 10.1039/C5RA08431H10.1039/C5RA08431H ↗
62. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2020.11690510.1016/j.carbpol.2020.116905 ↗
63. 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2018.06.01910.1016/j.polymertesting.2018.06.019 ↗