journal article·2023-09Open access

Large oxygen reduction response of CaFe2O4-WO3 heterostructure composite for protonic ceramic fuel cell cathode

Junjiao Li, Naveed Mushtaq, M.A.K Yousaf Shah, Badriah S. Almutairi, Sajid Rauf, Rizwan Raza, Fenghua Qi, Senlin Yan, Yuzheng Lu

Ceramics International· Volume 49· Issue 18

Abstract

Protonic Ceramic fuel cells (PCFCs) hold great promise for many applications; however, their high operating temperature hinders their commercial use in practice. The crucial issue that limits the electrochemical performance of PCFCs (including oxygen and proton-ion-conducting) is the sluggish oxygen redox reaction (ORR) at the cathode surface at low operating temperatures. Herein, we have developed a C aFe 2 O 4 -WO 3 heterostructure composite by interface-vacancy engineered for an efficient ORR electrocatalyst for LT-PCFCs. The C aFe 2 O 4 -WO 3 heterostructure composite exhibits very low cathodic area-specific resistance (ASR) and high oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) activity response at low operating temperatures of 400–550 °C using a BaCe 0.7 Zr 0.2 Y 0.1 O 3-δ (proton-conducting) electrolyte. We have demonstrated high-power density of 585 ± 2% mW-cm −2 with a current density of 1660 mA-cm −2 at 550 °C with H 2 fuel and atmospheric air as oxidant and even with possible operation at 400 °C. Moreover, the CaFe 2 O 4 -WO 3 heterostructure composite shows a very low proton migration energy and activation energy compared to individual CaFe 2 O 4 and WO 3 , helping to promote ORR activity. Various spectroscopic measurements, such as X-ray diffraction, high resolution transmission electron microscopy (HR-TEM), U-visible spectroscopy (UV–visible), Raman spectroscopy , X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) and density functional theory (DFT) calculations are employed to understand the interfacial properties for the improved ORR electrocatalytic activity of the CaFe 2 O 4 -WO 3 heterostructure composite cathode. Our obtained experimental and theoretical results can further help to develop functional cobalt-free electrocatalysts for LT-PCFCs.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advancements in Solid Oxide Fuel Cells · Fuel Cells and Related Materials · Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (39)

Show source-provided references
1. Solid oxide fuel cells10.1039/b105764m ↗
2. Materials for solid oxide fuel cells10.1021/cm902640j ↗
3. Progress in solid oxide fuel cell (SOFC) research
4. Lowering the temperature of solid oxide fuel cells10.1126/science.1204090 ↗
5. A comparative investigation on protonic ceramic fuel cell electrolytes BaZr0.8Y0.2O3-δ and BaZr0.1Ce0.7Y0.2O3-δ with NiO as sintering aid10.1016/j.ceramint.2022.02.278 ↗
6. Enhanced La0.6Sr0.4Co0.2Fe0.8O3–δ-based cathode performance by modification of BaZr0.1Ce0.7Y0.1Yb0.1O3–δ electrolyte surface in protonic ceramic fuel cells10.1016/j.ceramint.2021.02.123 ↗
7. Stable perovskite-fluorite dual-phase composites synthesized by one-pot solid-state reactive sintering for protonic ceramic fuel cells10.1016/j.ceramint.2021.08.182 ↗
8. BaFe0.6Co0.3Ce0.1O3−δas cathode materials for proton-conducting solid oxide fuel cells10.1016/j.ceramint.2016.03.141 ↗
9. Fluorination inductive effect enables rapid bulk proton diffusion in BaCo0.4Fe0.4Zr0.1Y0.1O3-δ perovskite oxide for high-activity protonic ceramic fuel cell cathode10.1016/j.apcatb.2022.121759 ↗
10. Highly durable, coking and sulfur tolerant, fuel-flexible protonic ceramic fuel cells10.1038/s41586-018-0082-6 ↗
11. Rational design of Sr2Fe1.5Mo0.4Y0.1O6-δ oxygen electrode with triple conduction for hydrogen production in protonic ceramic electrolysis cell10.1016/j.seppur.2022.121780 ↗
12. Rooney and Kening Sun Tuning the defects of the triple conducting oxide BaCo0.4Fe0.4Zr0.1Y0.1O3−δ perovskite toward enhanced cathode activity of protonic ceramic fuel cells10.1039/C9TA04335G ↗
13. Self-assembled triple-conducting nanocomposite as a superior protonic ceramic fuel cell cathode10.1016/j.joule.2019.07.004 ↗
14. Survey of materials selection for ceramic fuel cells II. Cathodes and anodes10.1016/0167-2738(96)00291-3 ↗
15. Processing of high performance composite cathodes for protonic ceramic fuel cells by exsolution10.1039/C8TA10950H ↗
16. Tailoring the oxygen vacancy to achieve fast intrinsic proton transport in a perovskite cathode for protonic ceramic fuel cells10.1021/acsaem.0c00486 ↗
17. Oxygen surface exchange kinetics of Pr2(Ni,Co)O4+δ thin-film model electrodes10.1149/2.0521914jes ↗
18. New reduced-temperature ceramic fuel cells with dual-ion conducting electrolyte and triple-conducting double perovskite cathode10.1039/C9TA03501J ↗
19. Mixed proton–electron–oxide ion triple conducting manganite as an efficient cobalt-free cathode for protonic ceramic fuel cells10.1039/D0TA03899G ↗
20. Enhanced oxygen reduction reaction activity of BaCe0. 2Fe0. 8O3-δ cathode for proton-conducting solid oxide fuel cells via Pr-doping10.1016/j.jpowsour.2021.229776 ↗
21. Doped (Nd, Ba) FeO 3 oxides as potential electrodes for symmetrically designed protonic ceramic electrochemical cells
22. Readily processed protonic ceramic fuel cells with high performance at low temperatures10.1126/science.aab3987 ↗
23. Tuning the energy band structure at interfaces of the SrFe0. 75Ti0. 25O3− δ–Sm0. 25Ce0. 75O2− δ heterostructure for fast ionic transport10.1021/acsami.9b13044 ↗
24. First principles calculations of oxygen reduction reaction at fuel cell cathodes10.1016/j.coelec.2019.11.005 ↗
25. Tatarchuk · 2016 · 305
26. Excellent oxygen reduction electrocatalytic activity of nanostructured CaFe2O4 particles embedded microporous Ni-Foam10.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.12.187 ↗
27. A facile one step route to synthesize WO3 nanoplatelets for CO oxidation and photodegradation of RhB: microstructural, optical and electrical studies10.1039/C6RA13500E ↗
28. Constructing highly active surface-nanostructured core/bi-shell La1.2Sr0.8Ni0.5Mn0.5O4+δ cathode for protonic ceramic fuel cells10.1016/j.cej.2023.141459 ↗
29. Mixed proton and electron conducting double perovskite anodes for stable and efficient tubular proton ceramic electrolysers10.1038/s41563-019-0388-2 ↗
30. Impact of crystallites on enhancement of bandgap of Mn1-xZnxFe2O4 (1≥ x≥ 0) nanospinels10.1016/j.cplett.2020.137240 ↗
31. Surface and bulk study of strontium-rich chromium ferrite oxide as a robust solid oxide fuel cell cathode10.1039/C5TA05815E ↗
32. Oxygen stoichiometries in La1−xSrxCo1− yFeyO3−δ perovskites at reduced oxygen partial pressures10.1016/S0167-2738(00)00718-9 ↗
33. Phase stability and oxygen nonstoichiometry of highly oxygen-deficient perovskite-type oxides: a case study of (Ba, Sr)(Co, Fe)O3−δ10.1021/cm2033004 ↗
34. Cation distribution and particle size effect on Raman spectrum of CoFe2O410.1016/j.jssc.2010.10.019 ↗
35. Defects/strain influenced magnetic properties and inverse of surface spin canting effect in single domain CoFe2O4 nanoparticles10.1016/j.apsusc.2015.12.205 ↗
36. Oxygen evolution reaction over Fe site of BaZrxFe1-xO3-δ perovskite oxides10.1016/j.electacta.2017.04.167 ↗
37. Prediction of solid oxide fuel cell cathode activity with first-principles descriptors10.1039/c1ee02032c ↗
38. In-situ local phase-transitioned MoSe2 in La0.5Sr0.5CoO3-δ heterostructure and stable overall water electrolysis over 1000 hours10.1038/s41467-019-09339-y ↗
39. Quantum-mechanics-based design principles for solid oxide fuel cell cathode materials10.1039/c1ee02377b ↗