journal article·2017-03

Correlation between Boundary Misorientation and a Geometric Parameter for Cross‐Boundary Twins in Mg Alloys

Qiaoli Huang, Renlong Xin

Advanced Engineering Materials· Volume 19· Issue 3
Publisher page

Abstract

Cross‐boundary twins (referred to as twin pairs) are frequently observed at grain boundaries with small grain boundary angle (θ) in deformed Mg alloys. This study calculates the distribution of the high peak geometric compatibility factor (m′) values over potential variants with θ. The misorientation angles (α) between the potential variants of twin pairs are also evaluated. It reveals that α is a reasonable reflection of the m′ parameter for ideal basal texture. There is a clear variant with high m′, but there may be two variants with similar small values of α. Moreover, it shows that θ correlates reasonably with high peak values of m′, particularly below 30° of misorientation.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Magnesium Alloys: Properties and Applications · Hydrogen Storage and Materials · Aluminum Alloys Composites Properties

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

School of Computer and Information Science Southwest University Chongqing China

College of Materials Science and Engineering Chongqing University Chongqing China

References (19)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/0079-6425(94)00007-710.1016/0079-6425(94)00007-7 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.actamat.2011.11.02210.1016/j.actamat.2011.11.022 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2012.06.00710.1016/j.scriptamat.2012.06.007 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2013.11.00810.1016/j.scriptamat.2013.11.008 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.actamat.2014.07.04810.1016/j.actamat.2014.07.048 ↗
6. 10.1080/1478643100363083510.1080/14786431003630835 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2010.06.02710.1016/j.scriptamat.2010.06.027 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.msea.2014.04.10310.1016/j.msea.2014.04.103 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2016.05.04410.1016/j.scriptamat.2016.05.044 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.actamat.2014.10.00410.1016/j.actamat.2014.10.004 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.actamat.2015.08.02410.1016/j.actamat.2015.08.024 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.matdes.2016.06.07310.1016/j.matdes.2016.06.073 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.matdes.2015.07.13010.1016/j.matdes.2015.07.130 ↗
14. 10.1007/BF0267076210.1007/BF02670762 ↗
15. 10.1007/s11661-009-0097-610.1007/s11661-009-0097-6 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.cossms.2014.05.00310.1016/j.cossms.2014.05.003 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.actamat.2010.06.05910.1016/j.actamat.2010.06.059 ↗
18. Engler O. · 2010
19. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2004.07.00210.1016/j.scriptamat.2004.07.002 ↗