Machine Learning-Based Operational State Recognition and Compressive Property Prediction in Fused Filament Fabrication
Source abstract
Abstract
3D printing has exhibited significant potential in outer space and medical implants. To use this technology in the specific high-value scenarios, 3D-printed parts need to satisfy quality-related requirements. In this article, the influence of the filament feeder operating states of 3D printer on the compressive properties of 3D-printed parts is studied in the fused filament fabrication process. A machine learning approach, back-propagation neural network with a genetic algorithm (GA-BPNN) optimized by k -fold cross-validation, is proposed to monitor the operating states and predict the compressive properties. Vibration and current sensors are used in situ to monitor the operating states of the filament feeder, and a set of features are extracted and selected from raw sensor data in time and frequency domains. Results show that the operating states of the filament feeder significantly affected the compressive properties of the fabricated samples, the operating states were accurately recognized with 96.3% rate, and compressive properties were successfully predicted by the GA-BPNN. This proposed method has the potential for use in industrial applications after 3D printing without requiring any further quality control.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · 3D Printing in Biomedical Research · Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Aerospace Information Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
CAS Key Laboratory of Space Manufacturing Technology, Technology and Engineering Center for Space Utilization, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
References (55)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1038/s41578-018-0002-210.1038/s41578-018-0002-2 ↗
2. 10.1021/ac403397r10.1021/ac403397r ↗
3. 10.1016/j.mattod.2015.05.00110.1016/j.mattod.2015.05.001 ↗
4. 10.3390/polym1104065610.3390/polym11040656 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2018.01.01310.1016/j.compscitech.2018.01.013 ↗
6. 10.1073/pnas.171515711510.1073/pnas.1715157115 ↗
7. 10.1021/acsami.9b1746710.1021/acsami.9b17467 ↗
8. 10.1115/1.402872510.1115/1.4028725 ↗
9. 10.1080/10408436.2018.154997710.1080/10408436.2018.1549977 ↗
10. ISO/ASTM52942-20 Additive Manufacturing—Qualification Principles—Qualifying Machine Operators of Laser Metal Powder Bed Fusion Machines and Equipment Used in Aerospace Applications. West Conshohocken PA: ASTM International 2020.
11. 10.1016/j.compind.2019.01.01110.1016/j.compind.2019.01.011 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.cad.2015.04.00110.1016/j.cad.2015.04.001 ↗
13. 10.3390/s1911258910.3390/s19112589 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.addma.2018.01.00210.1016/j.addma.2018.01.002 ↗
15. 10.1007/s40436-014-0097-710.1007/s40436-014-0097-7 ↗
16. 10.3390/polym1208166510.3390/polym12081665 ↗
17. Iragi M, , Pascual-González C, , Esnaola A, et al. Ply and interlaminar behaviours of 3D printed continuous carbon fibre-reinforced thermoplastic laminates; effects of processing conditions and microstructure. Addit Manuf, 2019; 30:100884.
18. Goh GD Yeong WY. Mode I interlaminar fracture toughness of additively manufactured carbon fiber thermoplastic. In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Progress in Additive Manufacturing. 2018; pp. 505–510.
19. 10.18063/ijb.v6i1.25310.18063/ijb.v6i1.253 ↗
20. 10.1007/s10462-020-09876-910.1007/s10462-020-09876-9 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.eng.2019.04.01210.1016/j.eng.2019.04.012 ↗
22. Wu H, , Yan W, , Yu Z. In-situ monitoring of FDM machine condition via acoustic emission. Int J Adv Manuf Tech, 2016; 84:1483–1495.
23. 10.1109/TII.2019.291052410.1109/TII.2019.2910524 ↗
24. 10.3390/s1803074910.3390/s18030749 ↗
25. 10.1007/s40684-018-0051-410.1007/s40684-018-0051-4 ↗
26. 10.3390/s1805149510.3390/s18051495 ↗
27. Fiedler M. Evaluating tension and tooth geometry to optimize grip on 3D printer filament, 3D Print. Addit Manuf, 2015; 2:85–88.
28. 10.1007/s00170-015-7300-210.1007/s00170-015-7300-2 ↗
29. 10.1109/JSEN.2016.258414110.1109/JSEN.2016.2584141 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.matdes.2016.02.09910.1016/j.matdes.2016.02.099 ↗
31. Hammond O, , Li X. In-situ real time defect detection of 3D printed parts. Addit Manuf, 2017; 17:135–142.
32. 10.1021/acs.macromol.8b0190810.1021/acs.macromol.8b01908 ↗
33. 10.1007/s00170-016-8914-810.1007/s00170-016-8914-8 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.rcim.2019.01.00410.1016/j.rcim.2019.01.004 ↗
35. 10.1115/1.402982310.1115/1.4029823 ↗
36. 10.1109/TASE.2017.276360910.1109/TASE.2017.2763609 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2014.12.02110.1016/j.jmatprotec.2014.12.021 ↗
38. 10.1089/3dp.2016.001110.1089/3dp.2016.0011 ↗
39. Yang Y, , Li L, , Zhao J. Mechanical property modeling of photosensitive liquid resin in stereolithography additive manufacturing: Bridging degree of cure with tensile strength and hardness. Mater Design, 2018; 162:428–428.
40. 10.1002/adem.20180084010.1002/adem.201800840 ↗
41. 10.1002/adem.20180053910.1002/adem.201800539 ↗
42. 10.1126/science.aax761610.1126/science.aax7616 ↗
43. ASTM D695–15 Standard test method for compressive properties of rigid plastics. West Conshohocken PA: ASTM International 2015.
44. 10.1016/j.jmst.2018.12.01110.1016/j.jmst.2018.12.011 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2020.10785810.1016/j.compositesb.2020.107858 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2020.10655710.1016/j.polymertesting.2020.106557 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.matdes.2018.10754010.1016/j.matdes.2018.107540 ↗
48. 10.1109/TIE.2018.281136610.1109/TIE.2018.2811366 ↗
49. 10.1109/36.12421810.1109/36.124218 ↗
50. Montana D Davis L. Training feedforward neural network using genetic algorithm. In: Proceedings of the 11th International Joint Conference on AI Detroit MI. 1989; pp. 762–767.
51. 10.1016/j.renene.2016.03.10310.1016/j.renene.2016.03.103 ↗
52. 10.1016/0893-6080(89)90020-810.1016/0893-6080(89)90020-8 ↗
53. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.01.10510.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.01.105 ↗
54. Hsu C Chang C Lin CA. A practical guide to support vector classification. www.csie.ntu.edu.tw/~cjlin/papers/guide/guide.pdf (Last accessed December2021).
55. 10.1002/qre.222910.1002/qre.2229 ↗