Image-Based Geometrical Characterization of Nodes in Additively Manufactured Lattice Structures
Source abstract
Abstract
Additive manufacturing (AM) enables the fabrication of lattice structures with optimal mechanical, fluid, and thermal properties. However, during the AM fabrication process, defects are produced in the strut and node elements, which comprise the lattice structure. This leads to discrepancies between the AM fabricated lattice and its idealized computer-aided design (CAD) model, negatively affecting the ability to predict the mechanical behavior of the fabricated lattice via numerical models. Current research is focused on quantification of geometric uncertainties in the strut elements of the lattice; as-manufactured node geometries remain relatively unexplored on an individual scale, despite their criticality to the mechanical response of the structure. Understanding the geometrical properties of as-manufactured nodes relative to CAD idealizations can be used to improve lattice designs and numerical models. In this research, X-ray microcomputed tomography (μCT) is used to analyze and quantify the as-manufactured nodal geometry, found in face-centered cubic and face-centered cubic with axial struts lattices fabricated via selective laser melting. A custom tool is developed that enables auto-isolation and classification of nodal joints from μCT-derived cross-sectional slices. Geometrical properties are extracted from the isolated nodal cross sections and compared with their idealized CAD model counterpart. Quantification of geometrical defects provides insight into how nodes within an AM lattice structure differ from each other and their idealized design. Overall, this research is an initial step toward developing accurate and efficient numerical models, as well as better node design for AM.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Cellular and Composite Structures · 3D Shape Modeling and Analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
RMIT Centre for Additive Manufacture, RMIT University, Melbourne, Australia.
ARC Training Centre in Additive Biomanufacturing, Brisbane, Australia.
Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia.
Department of Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, RMIT University, Melbourne, Australia.
Fraunhofer Research Institution for Additive Manufacturing Technologies IAPT, Hamburg, Germany.
Department of Surgery, St. Vincent's Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.
References (39)
Show source-provided references
1. Gibson LJ Ashby MF. Cellular Solids: Structure and Properties. Cambridge UK: Cambridge University Press 1999.
2. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2015.09.03810.1016/j.compstruct.2015.09.038 ↗
3. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.846.47610.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.846.476 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.ijscr.2015.02.03710.1016/j.ijscr.2015.02.037 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.msec.2015.10.06910.1016/j.msec.2015.10.069 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.finel.2017.09.00510.1016/j.finel.2017.09.005 ↗
7. Tran P, , Peng C. Triply periodic minimal surfaces sandwich structures subjected to shock impact. J Sandwich Struct Mat, 2020. [Epub ahead of print]; DOI: 10.1177/1099636220905551.
8. Yang E, , Leary M, , Lozanovski B, , Downing D, , Mazur M, , Sarker A, , Khorasani AM, , Jones A, , Maconachie T, , Bateman S, , Easton M, , Qian M, , Choong P, , Brandt M. Effect of geometry on the mechanical properties of Ti-6Al-4V Gyroid structures fabricated via SLM: A numerical study. Mat Des, 2019; 184:108165.
9. Azman AH, , Vignat F, , Villeneuve F. Design Configurations and Creation of Lattice Structures for Metallic Additive Manufacturing. La Plagne, France: 14ème Colloque National AIP PRIMECA, 2015.
10. 10.1002/352760669610.1002/3527606696 ↗
11. 10.1016/S1359-6454(00)00379-710.1016/S1359-6454(00)00379-7 ↗
12. Sun S, , Brandt M, , Easton M. Powder bed fusion processes: An overview. In: Brandt M, ed. Laser Additive Manufacturing. Cambridge, UK: Woodhead Publishing, 2017; pp. 55–77.
13. 10.1016/j.matdes.2017.06.05810.1016/j.matdes.2017.06.058 ↗
14. 10.1007/s00170-018-3162-810.1007/s00170-018-3162-8 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.matdes.2018.05.04310.1016/j.matdes.2018.05.043 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2012.11.01110.1016/j.jmatprotec.2012.11.011 ↗
17. Leary M. Design of titanium implants for additive manufacturing. In: Froes FH, Qian M, eds. Titanium in Medical and Dental Applications. Cambridge, UK: Woodhead Publishing, 2018.
18. 10.1016/j.optlastec.2020.10619410.1016/j.optlastec.2020.106194 ↗
19. 10.1007/s00170-011-3566-110.1007/s00170-011-3566-1 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.addma.2016.10.00910.1016/j.addma.2016.10.009 ↗
21. 10.1177/095440541456752210.1177/0954405414567522 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2017.04.01110.1016/j.jmbbm.2017.04.011 ↗
23. 10.3390/met703009110.3390/met7030091 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.matdes.2019.10768510.1016/j.matdes.2019.107685 ↗
25. Lozanovski B, , Leary M, , Tran P, , Shidid D, , Qian M, , Choong P, , Brandt M. Computational modelling of strut defects in SLM manufactured lattice structures. Mat Des, 2019:107671.
26. 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2014.08.00910.1016/j.ijmecsci.2014.08.009 ↗
27. 10.1007/s11340-015-0117-y10.1007/s11340-015-0117-y ↗
28. 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2013.01.00610.1016/j.ijmecsci.2013.01.006 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.optlastec.2018.07.05010.1016/j.optlastec.2018.07.050 ↗
30. 10.1007/s00170-019-04092-410.1007/s00170-019-04092-4 ↗
31. Alghamdi A, , Maconachie T, , Downing D, et al. Effect of additive manufactured lattice defects on mechanical properties: an automated method for the enhancement of lattice geometry. Int J Adv Manuf Technol, 2020:1–15.
32. 10.1016/j.matdes.2018.06.01010.1016/j.matdes.2018.06.010 ↗
33. 10.3390/ma1112246310.3390/ma11122463 ↗
34. 10.1016/0734-189X(85)90093-310.1016/0734-189X(85)90093-3 ↗
35. 10.1016/S0032-5910(03)00048-210.1016/S0032-5910(03)00048-2 ↗
36. 10.1089/3dp.2018.006010.1089/3dp.2018.0060 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.matdes.2017.09.00310.1016/j.matdes.2017.09.003 ↗
38. 10.1111/j.1475-1305.2008.00498.x10.1111/j.1475-1305.2008.00498.x ↗
39. 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2012.12.00410.1016/j.ijmecsci.2012.12.004 ↗