journal article·2023-05

Deformation-induced interfacial-twin-boundary ω-phase in an Fe48Mn37Al15 body-centered cubic metastable alloy

Huabei Peng, Xiao Yang, Lixin Sun, Liqiu Yong, Jiazhen Yan, Jinyong Zhang, Bingnan Qian, Yuhua Wen

Publisher page

Abstract

ω-phase transformation, which plays a key role in modifying mechanical properties, is widely observed in group IV transition alloys. However, the widely accepted ω-phase has not been found in body-centered cubic (BCC) Fe-based alloys yet. In this study, an Fe48Mn37Al15 alloy displayed α → γ` martensitic transformation during a 6%–21% compressive process, and {112}bcc<111> mechanical twinning occurred at 21% compressive strain. Furthermore, a thin layer of interfacial-twin-boundary ω-phase was confirmed located at the boundaries of twinning in this alloy. The possibility of artifacts ω-phase in Fe48Mn37Al15 alloy was carefully ruled out via transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and high-resolution TEM (HRTEM) observation. Therefore, a deformation-induced interfacial-twin-boundary ω-phase has been proven to be formed in an Fe48Mn37Al15 alloy during the compression process. In addition, this ω-phase was analyzed and found to agree with the classic crystallographic orientation relationship with both α matrix and {112}bcc twin. Hence, a geometrical model was schematically used to analyze the formation process of the interfacial-twin-boundary ω-phase.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Steels · High Entropy Alloys Studies · High Temperature Alloys and Creep

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (33)

Show source-provided references
1. Frost · Trans. Am. Math. Soc. · 1954 · 46 · 231
2. Shin · Mater. Sci. Eng. A · 2017 · 702 · 17310.1016/j.msea.2017.06.099 ↗
3. Hsiung · Acta Mater. · 2000 · 48 · 485110.1016/S1359-6454(00)00287-1 ↗
4. Dey · Acta Mater. · 2004 · 52 · 524310.1016/j.actamat.2004.07.008 ↗
5. Yamamoto · Acta Mater. · 2017 · 131 · 53410.1016/j.actamat.2017.03.048 ↗
6. Qian · Mater. Sci. Eng. A · 2021 · 882
7. Qian · J. Mater. Sci. Technol. · 2021 · 65 · 22810.1016/j.jmst.2020.04.078 ↗
8. Bartha · Mater. Lett. · 2022 · 30910.1016/j.matlet.2021.131376 ↗
9. Hickman · J. Mater. Sci. · 1969 · 4 · 55410.1007/BF00550217 ↗
10. Zhang · Mater. Sci. Eng. A · 2013 · 563 · 7810.1016/j.msea.2012.11.045 ↗
11. Blackburn · 1968
12. Sun · Acta Mater. · 2013 · 61 · 640610.1016/j.actamat.2013.07.019 ↗
13. Wu · Acta Mater. · 2014 · 62 · 12210.1016/j.actamat.2013.09.040 ↗
14. Liu · Sci. Rep. · 2015 · 5 · 1533110.1038/srep15331 ↗
15. Cayron · Scr. Mater. · 2021 · 19410.1016/j.scriptamat.2020.11.014 ↗
16. Gasillas · Scr. Mater. · 2020 · 186 · 29310.1016/j.scriptamat.2020.05.037 ↗
17. Omori · Superelasticity · 2017 · 3 · 32210.1007/s40830-017-0129-9 ↗
18. Ashby · Philos. Mag. · 1970 · 21 · 39910.1080/14786437008238426 ↗
19. Shen · Ultramicroscopy · 2018 · 184 · 15610.1016/j.ultramic.2017.08.013 ↗
20. Ando · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2009 · 9510.1063/1.3266848 ↗
21. Choudhuri · Mater. Res. Lett. · 2019 · 7 · 4010.1080/21663831.2018.1553212 ↗
22. Ahmed · J. Alloy. Compd. · 2015 · 629 · 26010.1016/j.jallcom.2015.01.005 ↗
23. Castany · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2016 · 11710.1103/PhysRevLett.117.245501 ↗
24. Xing · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2008 · 93
25. Yang · Acta Mater. · 2018 · 149 · 9710.1016/j.actamat.2018.02.036 ↗
26. Li · Acta Mater. · 2019 · 164 · 32210.1016/j.actamat.2018.10.048 ↗
27. Hanada · Metall. Trans. A · 1996 · 17 · 140910.1007/BF02650122 ↗
28. Christian · Prog. Mater. Sci. · 1995 · 39 · 110.1016/0079-6425(94)00007-7 ↗
29. Zhang · Mater. Res. Lett. · 2020 · 8 · 24710.1080/21663831.2020.1745920 ↗
30. Wu · Scr. Mater. · 2022 · 110 · 210
31. Zhang · J. Mater. Sci. Technol. · 2022 · 112 · 13010.1016/j.jmst.2021.09.048 ↗
32. Chen · J. Mater. Sci. · 2021 · 56 · 771010.1007/s10853-020-05706-z ↗
33. Dutta · Acta Mater. · 2012 · 60 · 55610.1016/j.actamat.2011.10.005 ↗